American Accounting Association - Current Issues in Auditing
AAA Digital Library

Current Issues in Auditing

Previous Article
Audit Quality in the Post-SOX Audit Environment: What Your Auditing Students Must Know about the PCAOB Inspection Process
SUMMARY: At the American Accounting Association's (AAA) Auditing Section Midyear Meeting in January 2007, the Education Committee organized a panel to discuss the educational issues that have surfaced...
Next Article
The SEC's XBRL Voluntary Filing Program on EDGAR: A Case for Quality Assurance
SUMMARY: XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) was developed to provide users with an efficient and effective means of preparing and exchanging business reporting, and especially financial inf...

You are logged in to this journal.

Management's Discussion and Analysis: Implications for Audit Practice and Research

Current Issues in Auditing 2 (2), A26 (2008);
doi: 10.2308/ciia.2008.2.2.A26

FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download PDF (83 kB) View Cart
SUMMARY: The quality of disclosures provided in the Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) is a subject of continuing concern on the part of regulators. Furthermore, a variety of regulatory bodies have recently initiated discussion on the extent to which the auditor should be involved with MD&A disclosures. Academic research yields information about explicit and implicit information that may be useful to the auditor in boosting both the quality of disclosures and the quality of the audit. Taking advantage of this potential reciprocal interaction between disclosure quality and audit quality may forestall the need for additional regulatory action, thus conferring benefits upon both practitioners and the investing public. ©2008 American Accounting Association
History: Submitted 15 July 2008; accepted 7 October 2008; published 12 January 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/CIAXXX/v2/i2/pA26/s1

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1936-1270 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef American Accounting Association

REFERENCES (28)

  1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1975. Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 8. New York, NY: AICPA.
  2. Behn, B. K., S. E. Kaplan, and K. R. Krumwiede. 2001. Further evidence on the auditor's going-concern report: The influence of management plans. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20: 13–28.
  3. Botosan, C. A. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 (July): 323–349.
  4. Bryan, S. H. 1997. Incremental information content of required disclosures contained in management discussion and analysis. The Accounting Review 72 (2): 285–301.
  5. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). 2003. 20 Questions Directors Should Ask About Management's Discussion and Analysis. Available at: http://www.cica.ca/download.cfm?ci_id=35205&la_id=1&re_id=su0.
  6. Clarkson, P. M., J. L. Kao, and G. D. Richardson. 1999. Evidence that management discussion and analysis (MD&A) is a part of a firm's overall disclosure package. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (1): 111–134.
  7. Cohen, J. C., L. M. Gaynor, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2007. Auditor communications with the audit committee and the board of directors: Policy recommendations and opportunities for future research. Accounting Horizons 21 (2): 165–187.
  8. Cohen, J. C., L. M. Gaynor, G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. Wright. 2008. Academic research on communications among external auditors, the audit committee, and the board: Implications and recommendations for practice. Current Issues in Auditing 2: A1–A8.
  9. Francis, J., K. Schipper, and L. Vincent. 2003. The relative and incremental explanatory power of earnings and alternative (to earnings) performance measures for returns. Contemporary Accounting Research 20: 121–164.
  10. Gibbins, M., and B. Pomeroy. 2007. Reflections on continuous reporting and auditing. Accounting Perspectives 6 (3): 291–304.
  11. Glassman, C. A. 2003. Speech by SEC Commissioner: Improving corporate disclosure—improving shareholder value. Given at 23rd Annual Ray Garrett Jr. Corporate and Securities Law Institution, at Northwestern University School of Law, Chicago, IL, April 10.
  12. Holder-Webb, L. 2007. The question of disclosure: Providing a tool for evaluating management's discussion and analysis. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research 10: 183–223.
  13. Holder-Webb, L., and J. C. Cohen. 2007. The association between disclosure, distress, and failure. Journal of Business Ethics 75: 301–314.
  14. Hüfner, B. 2007. The SEC's MD&A: Does it meet the informational demands of investors? A conceptual evaluation. Schmalenbach Business Review 59 (January). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1000141.
  15. International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). 2005. Management commentary. Available at: http://www.iasb.org/NR/rdonlyres/0FE78C14-8AF9-4CFB-A764-40B1A08E0DF5/0/DPManagementCommentary.pdf.
  16. Jones, C., and C. Cole. 2005. Management discussion and analysis: A review and implications for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature 24: 135–174.
  17. Meiers, D. H. 2006. The MD&A challenge: The difficulty of crafting a quality disclosure. Journal of Accountancy 201 (1): 59–66.
  18. Pava, M., and M. Epstein. 1993. How good is MD&A as an investment tool?. Journal of Accountancy 175 (3): 51–53.
  19. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004. Potential Project—Auditor's Responsibility for Communications Containing Financial Information. Standard Advisory Group Meeting, Washington, D.C.
  20. Rogers, R. K., and J. Grant. 1997. Content analysis of information cited in reports of sell-side financial analysts. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 3: 17–30.
  21. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 1989. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations: Certain Investment Company Disclosures. Financial Reporting Release No. 36. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
  22. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2001. Petition to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for Issuance to Interpretive Release. Washington, D.C.: SEC. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/petndiscl-12312001.htm.
  23. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2002a. Proposed Rule: Disclosure in Management's Discussion and Analysis about the Application of Critical Accounting Policies. 17 CFR Parts 228, 229, and 249. Release Nos. 33–8098, 34–45907; International Series Release No. 1258; File No. S7–16–02; RIN 3235–AI44. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
  24. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2002b. Comment Letter: Release Nos. 33–8098 and 34–45907: Disclosure in Management's Discussion and Analysis about the Application of Critical Accounting Policies (File No. S7-16-02). Washington, D.C.: SEC. Available at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71602/hartig1.htm.
  25. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2003a. Interpretation: Commission Guidance Regarding Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. 17 CFR Parts 211, 231, and 241. Release Nos. 33–8350, 34–48960, and FR-72. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
  26. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2003b. Summary by the Division of Corporation Finance of Significant Issues Addressed in the Review of the Periodic Reports of the Fortune 500 Companies. Washington, D.C.: SEC.
  27. Stokes, S. 2006. Current SEC and PCAOB Developments. Remarks delivered by SEC Staff at the 2006 AICPA National Conference, Washington, D.C., December 16.
  28. Tavcar, L. R. 1998. Make the MD&A more readable. CPA Journal Online. Available at: http://nysscpa.org/cpajournal/1998/0198/newsViews/0198NV7.htm.
RSS Library Card Alerts