American Accounting Association - Current Issues in Auditing
AAA Digital Library

Current Issues in Auditing

Previous Article
Entity-Level Controls: The Internal Auditor's Assessment of Management Tone at the Top
SUMMARY: The internal audit function's (IAF) regular interaction with management and continual presence within the organization place it in a unique position to monitor the organization. Although the ...
Next Article
Auditing Standards Committee Comment Letter PCAOB Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 026: Proposed Auditing Standards Related to the Auditor's Assessment of and Response to Risk and Conforming Amendments to PCAOB Standards

You are logged in to this journal.

Auditing the Auditors: A Case on PCAOB Inspection Reports of Registered Public Accounting Firms

Current Issues in Auditing 3 (1), B1 (2009);
doi: 10.2308/ciia.2009.3.1.B1

FULL TEXT OPTIONS
Download PDF (110 kB) View Cart
SUMMARY: We present a timely practice-oriented case related to the inspection process of registered firms by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). This case allows auditing students an opportunity to explore the unique challenges that public accounting firms auditing U.S. public companies face with respect to the PCAOB inspection process. The case focuses on large and small registered firms (inspected annually and triennially, respectively) receiving an inspection report where the PCAOB identified certain matters considered to be audit deficiencies of such significance that the inspection team believed the audit firm did not obtain sufficient competent evidential matter to support the auditor's opinion. The case exposes students to the PCAOB inspection process, highlights many deficiencies noted to date by the PCAOB inspectors, and emphasizes the importance of sufficient and appropriately documented audit evidence to support audit opinions. By reviewing `deficient' inspection reports, students gain an appreciation for common audit deficiencies as well as the subjective nature of portions of the authoritative literature and the inspection process itself. The case reinforces students' understanding of the practical matters involved in appropriately obtaining, evaluating, and documenting audit evidence, as well as educates students on the PCAOB inspection process in order to address important competencies required of Sarbanes-Oxley era audit professionals. ©2009 American Accounting Association
History: Submitted 3 December 2008; accepted 31 March 2009; published 28 May 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/CIAXXX/v3/i1/pB1/s1

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
1936-1270 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef American Accounting Association

REFERENCES (22)
View in Separate Window/Tab
  1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2006a. Smaller Firm PCAOB Inspection Deficiency Analysis. Based on inspection reports issued as of August 15, 2006, version 2006–2. New York, NY: AICPA.
  2. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2006b. Large Firm PCAOB Inspection Deficiency Analysis. Based on inspection reports issued as of January 19, 2006 on 2004 audits. New York, NY: AICPA.
  3. Arens, A., R. Elder, and M. Beasley. 2008. Auditing and Assurance Services. 12th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  4. Daugherty, B., and W. Tervo. 2009. PCAOB Inspections' influence on triennially inspected audit firms, investor confidence, and the public interest: Inspected firms' perspective. Working paper, presented at the research roundtable of the Midyear Conference of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association, January 17th.
  5. Hermanson, D., R. Houston, and J. Rice. 2007. PCAOB inspections of smaller CPA firms: Initial evidence from inspection reports. Accounting Horizons 21 (2): 137–152.
  6. Leone, M. 2008. Revenue recognition trips up auditors, clients. CFO.com (September 16). Available at: http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/12236991?f=search.
  7. Miller, R., and P. Pashkoff. 2002. Regulations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Accountancy 194 (4): 33–36.
  8. Miller, T. 2007. Using PCAOB inspection reports to add credibility and relevance while teaching auditing concepts. The Auditor's Report 30 (3): 1–3. Available at: http://aaahq.org/audit/Pubs/Audrep/07summer/item01.htm.
  9. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2003. Inspection of Registered Public Accounting Firms, October 7th. Release No. 2003–019. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  10. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004. Audit Documentation. Auditing Standard No. 3. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  11. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2005. PCAOB Releases Commencing with No. 104–2005–001: Reports on Inspections of Registered Firms. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  12. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2006a. PCAOB Releases Commencing with No. 104–2006–001: Reports on Inspections of Registered Firms. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  13. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2006b. Report on 2005 Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Issued by the PCAOB. Release No. 104–2006–025. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  14. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2007a. PCAOB Releases Commencing with No. 104–2007–001: Reports on Inspections of Registered Firms. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  15. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2007b. Report on the PCAOB's 2004, 2005, and 2006 Inspections of Domestic Triennially Inspected Firms. Release No. 2007–010. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  16. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2008a. PCAOB Releases Commencing with No. 104–2008–001: Reports on Inspections of Registered Firms. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  17. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2008b. Report on the PCAOB's 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 Inspections of Domestic Annually Inspected Firms. Release No. 2008–008. Washington, D.C.: PCAOB.
  18. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2009a. Registered Public Accounting Firms with the PCAOB. Available at: http://www.pcaobus.org/Registration/Registered_Firms.pdf.
  19. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2009b. PCAOB Disciplinary Proceedings. Available at: http://www.pcaobus.org/Enforcement/Disciplinary_Proceedings/index.aspx.
  20. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2009c. PCAOB website. Available at: http://www.pcaobus.org/index.aspx.
  21. Ribstein, L. 2002. Market vs. regulatory responses to corporate fraud: A critique of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Journal of Corporation Law (Fall): 1–67.
  22. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Financial Services. 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Public Law No. 107–204. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
RSS Library Card Alerts