Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Effect of the geometrical parameters on the electric field of pixelated two-dimensional arrays of gamma-ray spectrometers
We study the effect of the geometrical parameters of pixelated two-dimensional (2D) arrays of -ray spectrometers upon the distribution of the electric field lines, which are induced by the applied vol...
Next Article
Characteristic temperature study of GaAsP–AlGaAs tensile strained quantum well lasers
Temperature characteristics of tensile strained GaAs1–yPy–Al0.35Ga0.65As single quantum well heterostructure laser diodes are examined. The dependence of the characteristic temperature (T0) ...

1/f noise in pentacene organic thin film transistors

J. Appl. Phys. 88, 5395 (2000); doi:10.1063/1.1314618

Issue Date: 1 November 2000

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

P. V. Necliudov, S. L. Rumyantsev, and M. S. Shur
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Electrical, Computer, and System Engineering, Troy, New York 12180-3590

D. J. Gundlach and T. N. Jackson
Pennsylvania State University, Department of Electrical Engineering, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
We report on the flicker (1/f ) noise in pentacene organic thin film transistors (TFTs) of different designs. Our studies show that the TFT design affects the noise level and the noise dependence on the gate- and drain-source biases. The measured noise level was the lowest for the TFTs with a top source and drain contacts design. For these devices, the noise dependence at low drain current values resembled that for n-type crystalline Si metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors. The extracted Hooge parameter alpha, which allows comparing the noise level in different devices and materials, was 0.045 for the top-contact TFTs. This parameter value is several orders of magnitude lower than that for conducting polymers and only several times higher than that for hydrogenated amorphous Si (alpha-Si:H) TFTs. The bottom source and drain contacts TFTs had a much higher noise level with a noise dependence on the terminal voltages that differed from the noise voltage dependence for the top-contact TFTs. The Hooge parameter values were in the range of 5–20 for the bottom-contact TFTs. We estimated that the contact noise could be comparable to the channel noise for both top-contact and bottom-contact TFTs. ©2000 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 15 May 2000; accepted 3 August 2000
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/88/5395/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (137 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 85.30.Tv
    Electronic and magnetic devices; microelectronics Semiconductor devices Field effect devices
  • 72.70.+m
    Electronic transport in condensed matter Noise processes and phenomena
  • 85.30.De
    Electronic and magnetic devices; microelectronics Semiconductor devices Semiconductor-device characterization, design, and modeling
  • YEAR: 2000

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (22)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. D. J. Gundlach, C. C. Kuo, S. F. Nelson, and T. N. Jackson, 57th Annual Device Research Conference Digest, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 28–30 June 1999, pp. 164–165.
  2. H. Klauk, D. J. Gundlach, J. A. Nichols, C. D. Sheraw, M. Bonse, and T. N. Jackson, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 43, 63 (2000).
  3. Y.-Y. Lin, D. J. Gundlach, S. F. Nelson, and T. N. Jackson, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18, 606 (1997).
  4. J. Wang, D. J. Gundlach, C. C. Kuo, and T. N. Jackson, 41st Electronic Materials Conference Digest, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, June 30–July 2, 1999, p. 16.
  5. H. Klauk, D. J. Gundlach, M. Bonse, and T. N. Jackson, 46th International Symposium of the American Vacuum Society Technical Program, Seattle, WA, Oct. 25–29, 1999, p. 85.
  6. T. N. Jackson, Y. Y. Lin, D. J. Gundlach, and H. Klauk, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4, 100 (1998).
  7. Y. Y. Lin, D. J. Gundlach, S. F. Nelson, and T. N. Jackson, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 44, 320 (1997).
  8. P. V. Necliudov, M. S. Shur, D. J. Gundlach, and T. N. Jackson, Intern. Semicond. Research Symp. (ISDRS-99), Dec. 1–3, 1999, Charlottesville, VA, Proc. p. 373.
  9. P. V. Necliudov, M. S. Shur, D. J. Gundlach, and T. N. Jackson, ISDRS-99 Proceedings, 1999, pp. 373–376.
  10. T. A. Fjeldly, T. Itterdal, M. Shur, Introduction to Device Modeling and Circuit Simulation (Wiley, New York, 1998).
  11. Y.-Y. Lin, D. J. Gundlach, S. F. Nelson, and T. N. Jackson, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 18, 606 (1997).
  12. B. C. Lim, Y. J. Choi, J. H. Choi, and J. Jang, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 47, 367 (2000).
  13. L. Torsi, A. Dodbalapur, and H. E. Katz, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 1088 (1995).
  14. D. B. Slater, Jr., L. A. Larkin, G. M. Johson, A. V. Suvorov, and J. W. Palmour, 53rd Annual Device Research Conference Digest, University of Virginia, Virginia 19–21 June, 1995, p. 100.
  15. P. V. Necliudov, M. Shur, D. J. Gundlach, T. N. Jackson, J. Appl. Phys. (accepted for publication).
  16. H. Klauk (private communication).
  17. E. G. Guk, M. E. Levinshtein, V. A. Marikhin, L. P. Myasnikova, and S. L. Rumyantsev, Phys. Solid State 39, 690 (1997).
  18. S. Martin, A. Dodabalapur, Z. Bao, B. Crone, H. E. Katz, W. Li, A. Passner, and J. Rogers, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 3381 (2000).
  19. L. J. Vandamme, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 36, 978 (1989).
  20. F. N. Hooge, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41, 1926 (1994).
  21. J. Rhayen, M. Valenza, D. Rigaud, N. Szydlo, and H. Lebrun, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 3660 (1998).
  22. J. Chang, A. A. Abbidy, and C. R. Vishnanathan, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41, 1965 (1994).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.