Journal of Applied Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Negative differential resistance related to self-organization phenomena in a dc gas discharge
Oscillations stimulated by an S-shaped negative differential resistance originating from the self-assembly and decay of a self-organized space charge configuration in front of the anode of a dc gas di...
Next Article
CoSi2 formation in the presence of carbon
Silicide formation was studied for Co/C/Si and C/Co/Si bilayers. Phase formation and preferential orientation of the CoSi2 phase is strongly dependent on the C layer thickness. For thin interlayers an...

Electron energy deposition in an electron-beam pumped KrF amplifier: Impact of the gas composition

J. Appl. Phys. 92, 1200 (2002); doi:10.1063/1.1491592

Issue Date: 1 August 2002

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

J. L. Giuliani
Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375

G. M. Petrov
Berkeley Scholars, Incorporated, P.O. Box 852, Springfield, Virginia 22150

A. Dasgupta
Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375
Calculations for electron deposition in electron beam generated KrF laser at atmospheric pressure have been performed. The impact of the Ar/Kr/F2 gas mixture on the electron energy distribution function, electron density, and mean energy, energy per electron–ion pair, attachment, dissociation, excitation, and ionization rates have been investigated. The F2 abundance controls the low energy (<~9 eV) component of the distribution function, while both the fluorine and krypton mole fraction affect the distribution in the midenergy domain (9 to ~25 eV). Consequently, the F2 attachment rate coefficient varies with the F2 mole fraction (xF2) such that the electron density scales as 1/x<sub>F[sub 2]</sub><sup>0.7</sup>. The rate coefficient for direct dissociation of F2 is smaller than for attachment but the former contributes more to the total power dissipation (~8% at xF2 = 0.01). The excitation-to-ionization ratio for Kr is not constant, as generally assumed, but increases by a factor of two with a decrease in either the Kr or F2 abundance. Combining the former and present investigations leads to a set of fitting formulas to be used in beam kinetics codes for various collision rates as a function of both the electron beam power density and the composition. ©2002 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 21 December 2001; accepted 15 May 2002
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/92/1200/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (122 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 42.55.Lt
    Optics Lasers Gas lasers including excimer and metal-vapor lasers
  • 42.60.By
    Optics Laser optical systems: design and operation Design of specific laser systems
  • 42.55.Ah
    Optics Lasers General laser theory
  • 34.80.Gs
    Atomic and molecular collision processes and interactions Electron scattering Molecular excitation and ionization by electron impact
  • 34.80.Ht
    Atomic and molecular collision processes and interactions Electron scattering Dissociation and dissociative attachment by electron impact
  • 42.60.Lh
    Optics Laser optical systems: design and operation Efficiency, stability, gain, and other operational parameters
  • YEAR: 2002

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (22)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. R. J. Jensen, Fusion Technol. 11, 481 (1987).
  2. M. W. McGeoch, P. A. Corcoran, R. G. Altes, I. D. Smith, S. E. Bodner, R. H. Lehmberg, S. P. Obenschain, and J. D. Sethian, Fusion Technol. 32, 610 (1997).
  3. J. D. Sethian, C. J. Pawley, S. P. Obenschain, K. A. Gerber, V. Serlin, C. A. Sullivan, T. Lehecka, W. D. Webster, M. W. McGeoch, I. D. Smith, P. A. Corcoran, and R. A. Altes, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 25, 221 (1997).
  4. J. D. Sethian, S. P. Obenschain, K. A. Gerber, C. J. Pawley, V. Serlin, C. A. Sullivan, W. D. Webster, A. V. Deniz, T. Lehecka, M. W. McGeoch, R. A. Altes, P. A. Corcoran, I. D. Smith, and O. C. Barr, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68, 2357 (1997).
  5. J. D. Sethian, M. Meyers, I. D. Smith, V. Carboni, J. Kishi, D. Morton, J. Pearce, B. Bowen, L. Schlitt, O. Barr, and W. Webster, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28, 1333 (2000).
  6. I. Okuda, J. Ma, E. Takahashi, I. Matsushima, Y. Matsumoto, S. Kato, and Y. Owadano, Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 72, 623 (2001).
  7. I. Okuda, E. Takahashi, I. Matsushima, Y. Matsumoto, S. Kato, and Y. Owadano, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 40, 1152 (2001).
  8. G. M. Petrov, J. L. Giuliani, and A. Dasgupta, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 2662 (2002).
  9. L. R. Peterson and J. E. Allen, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 6068 (1972).
  10. T. H. Johnson and A. M. Hunter, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 2406 (1980).
  11. W. L. Morgan and A. Szöke, Phys. Rev. A 23, 1256 (1981).
  12. A. Mandl, D. Klimek, and J. H. Parks, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 3940 (1984).
  13. F. Kannari, M. Obara, and T. Fujioka, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 4309 (1985).
  14. S. J. Czuchlewski, D. E. Hanson, B. J. Krohn, and A. R. Larson, Fusion Technol. 11, 560 (1987).
  15. W. L. Nighan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 297 (1978).
  16. A. Suda, H. Kumagai, and M. Obara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 218 (1987).
  17. W. L. Morgan, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 12, 449 (1992).
  18. D. L. McCorkle, L. G. Christophorou, A. A. Christodoulides, and L. Pichiarella, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1966 (1986).
  19. M. J. Kushner and T. J. Moratz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1856 (1988).
  20. M. Hayashi and T. Nimura, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4879 (1983).
  21. M. Elyaakoubi and P. Ranson, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 4733 (1995).
  22. L. G. Christophorou, Atomic and Molecular Radiation Physics (Wiley, London, 1971), p. 35.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.