Journal of Applied Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
High critical current density in Ti-doped MgB2/Ta/Cu tape by powder-in-tube process
Ti-doped MgB2/Cu tapes with Ta as a buffer layer were prepared through the in situ powder in tube method by using Mg, Ti, and B powders. The phase compositions, microstructure features, and supercondu...
Next Article
Effect of lattice expansion on the magnetotransport properties in layered manganites La1.4Sr1.6–yBayMn2O7
The layered manganite La1.4Sr1.6–yBayMn2O7 was prepared to investigate the relation between magnetotransport properties and lattice expansion in manganites with Sr3Ti2O7-type structure. The latti...

Sample-detector coupling in atomic resolution magnetic resonance diffraction

J. Appl. Phys. 92, 7345 (2002); doi:10.1063/1.1521795

Issue Date: 15 December 2002 | See: Publisher's Note

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Mladen Barbic and Axel Scherer
Department of Applied Physics and Department of Electrical Engineering, M/S 200-36, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125
A technique for potential realization of atomic resolution magnetic resonance diffraction was recently proposed for the case of a crystalline sample in proximity of a ferromagnetic sphere [M. Barbic, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 9987 (2002)]. This article predicted the detection of distinct peaks in the number of resonant spin sites at different magnetic field values for specific sphere and crystal configurations. Here, the focus is on the specific detection coupling mechanisms between the resonant spin population of the sample and the magnetic sphere probe. We investigate and compare the force, torque, and flux detection mechanisms in order to provide guidance to the experimental efforts towards the realization of the atomic resolution magnetic resonance diffraction. We also investigate the dependence of the magnetic resonance diffraction spectrum on the relative position of the magnetic sphere with respect to the crystal lattice. ©2002 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 19 June 2002; accepted 25 September 2002; publisher error corrected 18 April 2003
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/92/7345/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (406 kB) View Cart

ERRATUM

  1. Publisher's Note: "Sample-detector coupling in atomic resolution magnetic resonance diffraction" [J. Appl. Phys. 92, 7345 (2002)]
    Mladen Barbic et al.
    J. Appl. Phys. 93, 10148 (2003)

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 07.57.Pt
    Instruments, apparatus, and components common to several branches of physics and astronomy Infrared, submillimeter wave, microwave and radiowave instruments and equipment Submillimeter wave, microwave and radiowave spectrometers; magnetic resonance spectrometers, auxiliary equipment, and techniques
  • 07.79.Pk
    Instruments, apparatus, and components common to several branches of physics and astronomy Scanning probe microscopes and components Magnetic force microscopes
  • 07.55.Ge
    Instruments, apparatus, and components common to several branches of physics and astronomy Magnetic instruments and components Magnetometers for magnetic field measurements
  • 76.50.+g
    Magnetic resonances and relaxations in condensed matter, Mössbauer effect Ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and ferrimagnetic resonances; spin-wave resonance
  • YEAR: 2002

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (65)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. P. C. Lauterbur, Nature (London) 242, 190 (1973).
  2. P. Mansfield and P. K. Grannell, J. Phys. C 6, L422 (1973).
  3. F. W. Wehrli, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 28, 87 (1995).
  4. D. I. Hoult and R. E. Richards, J. Magn. Reson. 24, 71 (1976).
  5. D. I. Hoult and P. C. Lauterbur, J. Magn. Reson. 34, 425 (1979).
  6. S. C. Lee, K. Kim, S. Lee, J. H. Yi, S. W. Kim, K. S. Ha, and C. Cheong, J. Magn. Reson. 150, 207 (2001).
  7. J. A. Sidles, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2854 (1991).
  8. J. A. Sidles, J. L. Garbini, K. J. Bruland, D. Rugar, O. Zuger, S. Hoen, and C. S. Yannoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 249 (1995).
  9. D. Rugar, C. S. Yannoni, and J. A. Sidles, Nature (London) 360, 563 (1992).
  10. D. Rugar, O. Zuger, S. Hoen, C. S. Yannoni, H. -M. Vieth, and R. D. Kendrick, Science 264, 1560 (1994).
  11. Z. Zhang, P. C. Hammel, and P. E. Wigen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2005 (1996).
  12. K. Wago, O. Zuger, R. Kendrick, C. S. Yannoni, and D. Rugar, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 1197 (1996).
  13. K. J. Bruland, W. M. Dougherty, J. L. Garbini, J. A. Sidles, and S. H. Chao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3159 (1998).
  14. B. C. Stipe, H. J. Mamin, T. D. Stowe, T. W. Kenny, and D. Rugar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2874 (2001).
  15. T. D. Stowe, K. Yasumura, T. W. Kenny, D. Botkin, K. Wago, and D. Rugar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 88 (1997).
  16. O. Zuger and D. Rugar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 2496 (1993).
  17. O. Zuger, S. T. Hoen, C. S. Yannoni, and D. Rugar, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 1881 (1996).
  18. M. Barbic, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 9987 (2002).
  19. P. Mansfield and P. K. Grannell, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3618 (1975).
  20. C. P. Slichter, Principles of Magnetic Resonance (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).
  21. Z. Zhang, M. L. Roukes, and P. C. Hammel, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 6931 (1996).
  22. W. M. Dougherty, K. J. Bruland, S. H. Chao, J. L. Garbini, S. E. Jensen, and J. A. Sidles, J. Magn. Reson. 143, 106 (2000).
  23. A. Suter, D. V. Pelekhov, M. L. Roukes, and P. C. Hammel, J. Magn. Reson. 154, 210 (2002).
  24. A. N. Cleland and M. L. Roukes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2653 (1996).
  25. D. W. Carr, S. Evoy, L. Sekaric, H. G. Craighead, and J. M. Parpia, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 920 (1999).
  26. Y. T. Yang, K. L. Ekinci, X. M. H. Huang, L. M. Schiavone, M. L. Roukes, C. A. Zorman, and M. Mehregany, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 162 (2001).
  27. A. N. Cleland, M. Pophristic, and I. Ferguson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2070 (2001).
  28. M. A. Lantz, S. P. Jarvis, and H. Tokumoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 383 (2001).
  29. D. R. Baselt, G. U. Lee, K. M. Hansen, L. A. Chrisey, and R. J. Colton, Proc. IEEE 85, 672 (1997).
  30. H. J. Mamin and D. Rugar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3358 (2001).
  31. R. N. Kleiman, G. K. Kaminsky, J. D. Reppy, R. Pindak, and D. J. Bishop, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 2088 (1985).
  32. R. N. Kleiman, G. Agnolet, and D. J. Bishop, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2079 (1987).
  33. A. N. Cleland and M. L. Roukes, Nature (London) 392, 160 (1998).
  34. C. A. Bolle, V. Aksyuk, F. Pardo, P. L. Gammel, E. Zeldov, E. Bucher, R. Boie, D. J. Bishop, and D. R. Nelson, Nature (London) 399, 43 (1999).
  35. D. W. Carr, S. Evoy, L. Sekaric, H. G. Craighead, and J. M. Parpia, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1545 (2000).
  36. C. Ascoli, P. Baschieri, C. Frediani, L. Lenci, M. Martinelli, G. Alzetta, R. M. Celli, and L. Pardi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3920 (1996).
  37. M. Lohndorf, J. Moreland, and P. Kabos, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1176 (2000).
  38. J. Moreland, M. Lohndorf, P. Kabos, and R. D. McMichael, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 3099 (2000).
  39. A. Jander, J. Moreland, and P. Kabos, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2348 (2001).
  40. D. L. Olson, T. L. Peck, A. G. Webb, R. L. Magin, and J. V. Sweedler, Science 270, 1967 (1995).
  41. L. R. Narasimhan, C. K. N. Patel, and M. B. Ketchen, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 9, 3503 (1999).
  42. G. Boero, P. A. Besse, and R. Popovic, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1498 (2001).
  43. R. D. Black, T. A. Early, P. B. Roemer, O. M. Mueller, A. Mogro-Campero, L. G. Turner, and G. A. Johnson, Science 259, 793 (1993).
  44. L. Kong and S. Y. Chou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1474 (1997).
  45. M. L. Roukes, A. Scherer, S. J. Allen, Jr., H. G. Craighead, R. M. Ruthen, E. D. Beebe, and J. P. Harbison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 3011 (1987).
  46. A. K. Geim, S. V. Dubonos, J. G. S. Lok, I. V. Grigorieva, J. C. Maan, L. T. Hansen, and P, E. Lindelof, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2379 (1997).
  47. W. Wernsdorfer, B. Doudin, D. Mailly, K. Hasselbach, A. Benoit, J. Meier, J.-Ph. Ansermet, and B. Barbara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1873 (1996).
  48. V. Agrawal, P. Neuzil, and D. W. van der Weide, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2343 (1997).
  49. A. M. Chang, H. D. Hallen, L. Harriott, H. F. Hess, H. L. Kao, J. Kwo, R. E. Miller, R. Wolfe, J. van der Ziel, and T. Y. Chang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1974 (1992).
  50. A. Oral, S. J. Bending, and M. Henini, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1324 (1996).
  51. T. Schweinbock, D. Weiss, M. Lipinski, and K. Eberl, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6496 (2000).
  52. J. R. Kirtley, M. B. Ketchen, K. G. Stawiasz, J. Z. Sun, W. J. Gallagher, S. H. Blanton, and S. J. Wind, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1138 (1995).
  53. H. Bergh and E. W. McFarland, Meas. Sci. Technol. 7, 1019 (1996).
  54. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980).
  55. A. Aharoni, Introduction to the Theory of Ferromagnetism (Oxford University, New York, 1996).
  56. W. F. Brown, Magnetostatic Principles in Ferromagnetism (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962).
  57. G. Binning, H. Rohrer, C. Gerber, and E. Weibel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 57 (1982).
  58. G. Binning, C. F. Quate, and C. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).
  59. D. M. Eigler and E. K. Schweizer, Nature (London) 344, 524 (1990).
  60. F. J. Giessibl, S. Hembacher, H. Bielefeldt, and J. Mannhart, Science 289, 422 (2000).
  61. C. Petit, A. Taleb, and M. P. Pileni, Adv. Mater. 10, 259 (1998).
  62. S. Sun, C. B. Murray, D. Weller, L. Folks, and A. Moser, Science 287, 1989 (2000).
  63. A. F. Puntes, K. M. Krishnan, and A. P. Alivisatos, Science 291, 2115 (2001).
  64. T. Hyeon, S. S. Lee, J. Park, Y. Chung, and H. B. Na, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 12798 (2001).
  65. J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.