Excitons in electrostatic traps
J. Appl. Phys. 99, 066104 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2181276
Published 21 March 2006
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
We consider in-plane electrostatic traps for indirect excitons in coupled quantum wells, where the traps are formed by a laterally modulated gate voltage. An intrinsic obstacle for exciton confinement in electrostatic traps is an in-plane electric field that can lead to exciton dissociation. We propose a design to suppress the in-plane electric field and, at the same time, to effectively confine excitons in the electrostatic traps. We present calculations for various classes of electrostatic traps and experimental proof of principle for trapping of indirect excitons in electrostatic traps.
©2006 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 4 April 2005; accepted 7 February 2006; published 21 March 2006 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/99/066104/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
- 73.21.Fg
Quantum wells (electron states/collective excitations) - 73.20.Mf
Collective excitations (surface/interface states) including excitons, polarons, plasmons and other charge-density excitations - 71.35.-y
Excitons and related phenomena - 73.22.Lp
Collective excitations (nanoscale materials) - YEAR: 2006
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (17)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- E. A. Cornell and C. E. Wieman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 875 (2002).
- W. Ketterle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 1131 (2002).
- J. P. Wolfe, W. L. Hansen, E. E. Haller, R. S. Markiewicz, C. Kittel, and C. D. Jeffries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1292 (1975).
- D. P. Trauernicht, A. Mysyrowicz, and J. P. Wolfe, Phys. Rev. B 28, 3590 (1983).
- K. Kash, J. M. Worlock, M. D. Sturge, P. Grabbe, J. P. Harbison, A. Scherer, and P. S. D. Lin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 782 (1988).
- V. Negoita, D. W. Snoke, and K. Eberl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2059 (1999).
- K. Brunner, U. Bockelmann, G. Abstreiter, M. Walther, G. Böhm, G. Tränkle, and G. Weimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3216 (1992).
- P. C. M. Christianen, F. Piazza, J. G. S. Lok, J. C. Maan, and W. van der Vleuten,
Physica B 249, 624 (1998) . - S. Zimmermann, A. O. Govorov, W. Hansen, J. P. Kotthaus, M. Bichler, and W. Wegscheider, Phys. Rev. B 56, 13414 (1997).
- T. Huber, A. Zrenner, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler,
Phys. Status Solidi A 166, R5 (1998) . - J. Krauß, J. P. Kotthaus, A. Wixforth, M. Hanson, D. C. Driscoll, A. C. Gossard, D. Schuh, and M. Bichler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5830 (2004).
- M. Hagn, A. Zrenner, G. Böhm, and G. Weimann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 232 (1995).
- D. A. B. Miller, D. S. Chemla, T. C. Damen, A. C. Gossard, W. Wiegmann, T. H. Wood, and C. A. Burrus, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1043 (1985).
- G. Beer, Programming the Boundary Element Method: An Introduction for Engineers (Wiley, New York, 2001).
- M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hansch, and I. Bloch,
Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002) . - L. V. Butov,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, R1577 (2004) . - A. I. Ivanov,
Europhys. Lett. 59, 586 (2002) .







