Journal of Applied Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
The influence of nano-oxide layer on magnetostriction of sensing layer in bottom spin valves
The magnetostriction coefficient (s) of ultrathin sputtered polycrystalline as-deposited and annealed Ta/Ni81Fe19(t)/Ta films was studied as a function of the thickness. s and magnetoresistance (MR) o...
Next Article
Nanowire based quantum interference sensors for electromagnetic radiation
We present a proposal for the use of a nanostructure for electromagnetic radiation sensing, which is based on quantum interference. One sensor format that is discussed is comprised of symmetric hexago...

Real-time coarsening dynamics of Ge/Si(100) nanostructures

J. Appl. Phys. 99, 094305 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2191574

Published 12 May 2006

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Michael R. Mckay
Science and Engineering of Materials, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504

John Shumway and Jeff Drucker
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504
The coarsening dynamics of Ge/Si(100) nanostructures were monitored using real-time, elevated temperature scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). Gas-source molecular beam epitaxy from digermane onto Si(100) was used to produce mixed hut and pyramid cluster ensembles. The width of the most elongated rectangular-based hut clusters was always less than the side length of square-based pyramid clusters for the growth conditions employed. This suggests that pyramid elongation to form hut clusters occurred at early growth stages for some smaller clusters. A previously unidentified coarsening mechanism was characterized during growth temperature annealing and was interpreted using atomistic elastic modeling. Pyramid clusters were more stable than narrow hut clusters with larger volumes. These larger volume huts decayed by reducing their length at a constant width, finally becoming small pyramids. These small pyramids are less stable than those that never elongated to form huts and consequently dissolve. The decrease in the total island volume identified using STM was attributed to large (diameter>1  µm), low chemical potential clusters. These clusters depleted the surface of Ge adatoms as evidenced by denuded zones devoid of smaller clusters observed for growth and annealing at higher temperatures. These results suggest that a preferred island size for pyramids and huts does not exist. ©2006 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 12 July 2005; accepted 28 February 2006; published 12 May 2006
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/99/094305/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (143 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 81.10.Bk
    Crystal growth from vapor
  • 61.46.Bc
    Clusters
  • 61.72.Cc
    Kinetics of defect formation and annealing
  • 68.37.Ef
    Scanning tunneling microscopy of surfaces, interfaces and thin films including chemistry induced with STM
  • 65.80.+n
    Thermal properties of small particles, nanocrystals, and nanotubes
  • YEAR: 2006

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (13)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. Y. W. Mo, D. E. Savage, B. S. Schwartzentruber, and M. G. Lagally, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1020 (1990).
  2. M. Tomitori, K. Watanabe, J. Kobayashi, and O. Nishikawa, Appl. Surf. Sci. 76/77, 332 (1994).
  3. M. Kastner and B. Voigtlander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2745 (1998);
  4. I. M. Lifshitz and V. V. Slyozov, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 35 (1961).
  5. F. M. Ross, J. Tersoff, and R. M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 984 (1997).
  6. C. Wagner, Z. Elektrochem. 65, 581 (1961).
  7. B. K. Chakraverty, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28, 2401 (1967).
  8. T. I. Kamins, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, D. A. A. Ohlberg, and R. Stanley Williams, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 1159 (1999).
  9. Y. Zhang and J. Drucker, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 9583 (2003).
  10. J. A. Floro, M. B. Sinclair, E. Chason, L. B. Freund, R. D. Twesten, R. Q. Hwang, and G. A. Lucadamo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 701 (1999).
  11. G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, T. I. Kamins, D. A. A. Ohlberg, and R. S. Williams, Phys. Rev. B 58, 3533 (1998).
  12. F. H. Stillinger and T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5262 (1985).
  13. K. Ding and H. C. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6987 (1986).
  14. P. Raiteri, D. B. Migas, L. Miglio, A. Rastelli, and H. von Känel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 256103 (2002).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.