Interface-induced phenomena in polarization response of ferroelectric thin films
J. Appl. Phys. 100, 051607 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2337009
Published 12 September 2006
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
This article reviews the existing theoretical models describing the interface-induced phenomena which affect the switching characteristics and dielectric properties of ferroelectric thin films. Three groups of interface-induced effects are addressednamely, "passive-layer-type" effects, ferroelectric-electrode contact potential effects, and the poling effect of the ferroelectric-electrode interface. The existing experimental data on dielectric and switching characteristics of ferroelectric thin film capacitors are discussed in the context of the reviewed theories. Special attention is paid to the case of internal bias field effects.
©2006 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 21 March 2006; accepted 28 June 2006; published 12 September 2006 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/100/051607/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (90)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- A. K. Tagantsev, M. Landivar, E. Colla, and N. Setter, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 2623 (1995).
- C. J. Brennan,
Ferroelectrics 132, 245 (1992) . - S. L. Miller, R. D. Nasby, J. R. Schwank, M. S. Rogers, and P. V. Dressendorfer, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 6463 (1990).
- The application of this formula to the comparison of the slope of loops for the sandwich and the ferroelectric taken at the same amplitude of the driving field Em is legitimate on condition that the loop slope at Ec does not essentially depend on Em. This condition can be met. An example of the data on the thickness dependence of the loop tilt, which have been acquired while checking the validity of this condition, has been reported by Tagantsev et al. (Ref. 5).
- A. K. Tagantsev, M. Landivar, E. Colla, and N. Setter, in Science and Technology of Electroceramic Thin Films, NATO ASI, edited by O. Auciello and R. Waser (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995), pp. 301314.
- In several papers, it has been attempted to find the theoretical support for this spurious effect. However, this has been accomplished only at the expense of unjustified assumptions or outright mistakes. For example, in Ref. 7 it was implicitly assumed that at Ec an essential part of the polarization does not vanish (cf. Ref. 1 for a discussion). In Ref. 8, the depolarizing field is wrongly taken to be parallelinstead of antiparallelto the direction of polarization.
- P. K. Larsen, G. J. M. Dormans, D. J. Taylor, and P. J. Vanveldhoven, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 2405 (1994).
- M. Dawber, P. Chandra, P. B. Littlewood, and J. F. Scott,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, L393 (2003) . - J. F. M. Cillessen, M. W. J. Prins, and R. W. Wolf, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 2777 (1997).
- A. K. Tagantsev and I. A. Stolichnov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1326 (1999).
- Note that, in this case, the total (measured) polarization of the system is not given by the charge on the electrode, which is equal to Pf
, since the variation of the latter is not fully controlled by the current in the external circuit. - J. Zhu, X. Zhang, Y. Zhu, and S. B. Desu, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 1610 (1998).
- S. P. Alpay, I. B. Misirlioglu, V. Nagarajan, and R. Ramesh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2044 (2004).
- M. W. Chu, I. Szafraniak, R. Scholz, C. Harnagea, D. Hesse, M. Alexe, and U. Gösele,
Nat. Mater. 3, 87 (2004) . - I. P. Batra and B. D. Silverman,
Solid State Commun. 11, 291 (1972) . - R. D. Tilley and B. Zeks,
Ferroelectrics 134, 313 (1992) . - J. M. Ziman, Principles of the Theory of Solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972).
- R. Kretschmer and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 20, 1065 (1979).
- Making allowance for the background permittivity becomes important when the depolarizing effect is involved, cf. Ref. 20.
- A. K. Tagantsev,
Ferroelectrics 69, 321 (1986) . - A. K. Tagantsev, E. Courtens, and L. Arzel, Phys. Rev. B 64, 224107 (2001).
- Y. Yamada, G. Shirane, and A. Linz, Phys. Rev. 177, 848 (1969).
- Actually, the correlation length is anisotropic, i.e., the parameter
cf. Eq. (2.19)is different for different orientations of the polarization and of its gradient. Since we are now interested in an estimate, we neglect this anisotropy in our consideration. - O. G. Vendik and S. P. Zubko, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 5343 (2000).
- S. K. Streiffer, C. Basceri, C. B. Parker, S. E. Lash, and A. I. Kingon, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 4565 (1999).
- C. Basceri, S. K. Streiffer, A. I. Kingon, and R. Waser, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2497 (1997).
- O. G. Vendik and S. P. Zubko, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 4475 (1997).
- J. Junquera and P. Ghosez,
Nature (London) 422, 506 (2003) . - N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, and A. K. Tagantsev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 (1998).
- A. Kopal, P. Mokry, J. Fousek, and T. Bahnik,
Ferroelectrics 223, 127 (1999) . - A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3177 (2000).
- A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. B 63, 132103 (2001).
- P. Mokry, A. K. Tagantsev, and N. Setter, Phys. Rev. B 70, 172107 (2004).
- P. Mokry and A. K. Tagantsev (unpublished).
- A. K. Tagantsev, I. Stolichnov, N. Setter, and J. S. Cross, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 6616 (2004).
- M. Grossmann, O. Lohse, D. Bolten, U. Boettger, T. Schneller, and R. Waser, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2680 (2002).
- M. Grossmann, O. Lohse, D. Bolten, U. Boettger, and R. Waser, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2688 (2002).
- J. J. OODwyer, The Theory of Electrical Conduction and Breakdown in Solid Dielectrics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1973).
- This analysis is related to the case of positive Ed; in the general case, Eq. (2.58) should be taken with |Ed| instead of Ed. This obviously does not affect the results of our analysis.
- I. L. Baginskii and E. G. Kostsov,
Phys. Status Solidi A 91, 705 (1985) . - We neglect the sign in the expression for Voff since, in practice, the sign of the voltage applied to a capacitor is fixed by convention. For a given convention, the sign of Voff can be determined from simple electrostatic arguments.
- C. J. Brennan,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 7, 93 (1995) . - J. G. Simmons,
J. Phys. Chem. Solids 32, 2581 (1971) . - Note that while
f, the dielectric constant of the ferroelectric, is a function of temperature,
l is the value of
f(T) at the electrochemical equilibrium temperature. - A. K. Tagantsev, C. Pawlaczyk, K. Brooks, and N. Setter,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 4, 1 (1994) . - The model discussed here is oversimplifiede.g., the electrodes and nearby-electrode regions of the ferroelectric are considered as electrochemically identical, and electrochemical equilibrium may not be reached at the deposition or top-electrode annealing temperature. However, these factors should not influence the validity of the qualitative picture of the phenomenon described by the model.
- J. F. Scott, C. A. P. de Araujo, B. M. Melnick, L. D. McMillan, and R. Zuleeg, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 382 (1991).
- R. Waser and M. Klee,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 2, 23 (1992) . - C. J. Brennan,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 2, 73 (1992) . - A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15042 (2000).
- A. K. Tagantsev, V. O. Sherman, K. F. Astafiev, J. Venkatesh, and N. Setter,
J. Electroceram. 11, 5 (2003) . - The dislocation population can be controlled during processingcf., e.g., T. Yamada, K. F. Astafiev, V. O. Sherman, A. K. Tagantsev, P. Muralt, and N. Setter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 142904 (2005).
- A. K. Tagantsev, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5883 (1986).
- A. K. Tagantsev,
Phase Transitions 35, 119 (1991) . - S. M. Kogan,
Sov. Phys. Solid State 5, 2069 (1964) . - W. Ma and L. E. Cross, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 4420 (2001).
- For the sake of clarity, we will henceforward make the approximation

/as


/a, which does not affect the essential features of the argument.
- K. Abe, S. Komatsu, N. Yanase, K. Sano, and T. Kawakubo,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 36, 5846 (1997) . - K. Abe, N. Yanase, T. Yasumoto, and T. Kawakubo, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 323 (2002).
- K. Abe, N. Yanase, T. Yasumoto, and T. Kawakubo,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 41, 6065 (2002) . - W. J. Merz,
Phys. Rev. 95, 690 (1956) . - R. Landauer, J. Appl. Phys. 28, 227 (1957).
- A. K. Tagantsev,
Ferroelectrics 184, 79 (1996) . - M. Molotskii, R. Kris, and G. Rosenman, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 5318 (2000).
- G. Gerra, A. K. Tagantsev, and N. Setter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 107602 (2005).
- The following expression for c is valid when the argument of the logarithmic function is much greater than unity, which is typically the case for ferroelectrics.
- A. P. Levanyuk and A. S. Sigov, Defects and Structural Phase Transitions (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1988).
- The thermodynamic coercive field introduced in this way is the field at which the antiparallel orientation of polarization relative to the applied field becomes absolutely unstable with respect to an infinitesimal increment of the polarization in the longitudinal direction. One should note that such quantity may not be the real thermodynamic coercive field of the system if more than two antiparallel domain states are involved in the switchingcf. Ref. 69.
- M. Iwata and Y. Ishibashi,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 38, 5670 (1999) . - T. Yamamoto,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 35, 5104 (1996) . - A. K. Tagantsev, I. Stolichnov, N. Setter, J. S. Cross, and M. Tsukada, Phys. Rev. B 66, 214109 (2002).
- Y. Imry and S. Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1399 (1975).
- A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 107601 (2005).
- A similar result was previously found by Glinchuk and Morozovska (Ref. 75), who considered the poling effect of the lattice mismatch between ferroelectric and substrate. In this case, the smearing of the phase transition is less pronounced, as the effect is proportional to the square of the misfit strain (typically less than 1%). Moreover, the relation between misfit strain and surface polarization in Eqs. (5) and (7) of Ref. 75 is incorrect: it is the latter quantity that is induced by the former via the piezoelectric effect, and not the other way around, so that strain should be multipliedand not dividedby the piezoelectric coefficient to get the induced polarization!
- M. D. Glinchuk and A. N. Morozovska,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, 3517 (2004) . - R. Takayama and Y. Tomita, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1666 (1989).
- D. Dimos, W. L. Warren, M. B. Sinclair, B. A. Tuttle, and R. W. Schwartz, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4305 (1994).
- A. L. Kholkin, K. G. Brooks, D. V. Taylor, S. Hiboux, and N. Setter,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 22, 1045 (1998) . - M. Alexe, C. Harnagea, D. Hesse, and U. Gösele, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 242 (2001).
- S. Traynor, T. Hadnagy, and L. Kammerdiner,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 16, 63 (1997) . - K. Abe, N. Yanase, and T. Kawakubo,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 39, 4059 (2000) . - In the original paper, Ref. 77, a relation was used in the discussion which predicts a linear thickness dependence of Voff. This relation, Eq. (1), is valid only in the absence of charges on the electrodes. The formula taking into account these charges, Eq. (2.54) in the present paper, does not predict such dependence.
- K. Carl and K. H. Hardtl,
Ferroelectrics 17, 473 (1978) . - E. G. Lee, D. J. Wouters, G. Willems, and H. E. Maes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2404 (1997).
- S. Hiboux and P. Muralt,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 36, 83 (2001) . - S. Hiboux, Ph. D. thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 2001.
- J. Lee, R. Ramesh, V. G. Keramidas, W. L. Warren, G. E. Pike, and J. T. Evans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1337 (1995).
- G. E. Pike, W. L. Warren, D. Dimos, B. A. Tuttle, R. Ramesh, J. Lee, V. G. Keramidas, and J. T. Evans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 484 (1995).
- W. L. Warren, D. Dimos, G. E. Pike, B. A. Tuttle, M. V. Raymond, R. Ramesh, and J. T. Evans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 866 (1995).
- P. Schorn, U. Ellerkmann, D. Bolten, U. Boettger, and R. Waser,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 53, 361 (2003) .







