Journal of Applied Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Stress dependence of the near-band-gap cathodoluminescence spectrum of GaN determined by spatially resolved indentation method
A microscopic procedure has been proposed for evaluating the stress dependence of the (room-temperature) cathodoluminescence (CL) excitonic band emitted from the (0001) crystallographic plane of GaN i...
Next Article
Silicate layer formation at HfO2/SiO2/Si interface determined by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and infrared spectroscopy
A high-k Hf-silicate interfacial layer grown by the solid phase reaction between sputtered metallic Hf films and an underlying SiO2/Si substrate through in situ vacuum annealing and subsequent thermal...

Surface reconstructions of cubic gallium nitride (001) grown by radio frequency nitrogen plasma molecular beam epitaxy under gallium-rich conditions

J. Appl. Phys. 100, 083516 (2006); doi:10.1063/1.2356604

Published 27 October 2006

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Muhammad B. Haider, Rong Yang, Costel Constantin, Erdong Lu, and Arthur R. Smith
Condensed Matter and Surface Science Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701

Hamad A. H. Al-Brithen
Condensed Matter and Surface Science Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701 and Department of Physics, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
Cubic GaN has been grown under gallium (Ga)-rich growth conditions using radio frequency nitrogen plasma molecular beam epitaxy on MgO(001) substrates. Reflection high energy electron diffraction patterns indicate the smoothness of the c-GaN surface and show 2× and even 8× periodicities after the growth at sample temperature Ts<200  °C and 1×1 at higher temperatures. Scanning tunneling microscopy images reveal a sequence of variant surface reconstructions including c(4×12), 4×7, c(4×16), 4×9, c(4×20), and 4×11. These variant reconstructions correspond to slightly different Ga adatom coverages all less than 1/4 ML, with 4×11 having the highest, and c(4×12) the lowest Ga coverage. The electronic properties of these six variant reconstructions are investigated, and they are found to have a metallic nature. ©2006 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 26 November 2005; accepted 5 July 2006; published 27 October 2006
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/100/083516/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (1419 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 68.35.Bs
    Structure of clean solid surfaces (reconstruction)
  • 68.47.Fg
    Semiconductor surfaces
  • 68.37.Ef
    Scanning tunneling microscopy of surfaces, interfaces and thin films including chemistry induced with STM
  • 73.20.At
    Surface states, band structure, electron density of states
  • YEAR: 2006

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (17)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. Wassermeier, A. Yamada, H. Yang, O. Brandt, J. Behrend, and K. H. Ploog, Surf. Sci. 385, 178 (1997).
  2. M. Wassermeier, H. Yang, O. Brandt, A. Yamada, J. Behrend, and K. H. Ploog, Appl. Surf. Sci. 123/124, 181 (1998).
  3. J. Neugebauer, T. Zywietz, M. Scheffler, J. E. Northrup, and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3097 (1998).
  4. S. Strite, J. Ruan, Z. Li, A. Salvador, H. Chen, D. J. Smith, W. J. Choyke, and H. Morkoç, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 1924 (1991).
  5. O. Brandt, H. Yang, B. Jenichen, Y. Suzuki, L. Däweritz, and K. H. Ploog, Phys. Rev. B 52, R2253 (1995).
  6. A. Kikuchi, H. Hoshi, and K. Kishino, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 34, 1153 (1995).
  7. H. Okumura, K. Ohta, G. Feuillet, K. Balakrishnan, S. Chichibu, H. Hamaguchi, P. Hacke, and S. Yoshida, J. Cryst. Growth 178, 113 (1997).
  8. D. Wang, S. Yoshida, and M. Ichikawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 2472 (2002).
  9. G. Feuillet, H. Hamaguchi, K. Ohta, P. Hacke, H. Okumura, and S. Yoshida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1025 (1997).
  10. G. Feuillet, H. Hamaguchi, H. Okumura, and S. Yoshida, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 59, 80 (1999).
  11. M.-H. Kim, F. S. Juang, Y. G. Hong, C. W. Tu, and S.-J. Park, J. Cryst. Growth 251, 465 (2003).
  12. R. C. Powell, N.-E. Lee, Y.-W. Kim, and J. E. Greene, J. Appl. Phys. 73, 189 (1992).
  13. A. R. Smith, H. A. H. Al-Brithen, D. C. Ingram, and D. Gall, J. Appl. Phys. 90, 1809 (2001).
  14. H. A. AL-Brithen and A. R. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2485 (2000).
  15. A. R. Smith, R. M. Feenstra, D. W. Greve, J. Neugebauer, and J. E. Northrup, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3934 (1997).
  16. H. A. H. Al-Brithen, R. Yang, M. B. Haider, C. Constantin, E. Lu, A. R. Smith, N. Sandler, and P. Ordejon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146102 (2005).
  17. R. M. Feenstra, Phys. Rev. B 50, 4561 (1994).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.