Journal of Applied Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Amorphous Mg-based metal foams with ductile hollow spheres
To date, high compressive ductility and energy absorption have been achieved in amorphous metal foams based on high-toughness Pd- and Zr-based metallic glasses and are known to result from two extrins...
Next Article
A robust polarization-spectral method for determination of twisted liquid crystal layer parameters
An experimental method for determining the configurational and optical parameters of the liquid crystal (LC) layers with a twisted structure is proposed. This method provides the determination of the ...

A molecular dynamics study of nanoindentation of amorphous silicon carbide

J. Appl. Phys. 102, 023509 (2007); doi:10.1063/1.2756059

Published 18 July 2007

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Izabela Szlufarska
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1595

Rajiv K. Kalia, Aiichiro Nakano, and Priya Vashishta
Collaboratory for Advanced Computing and Simulations, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0242; Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0242; Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0242; and Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0242
Through molecular dynamics simulation of nanoindentation of amorphous a-SiC, we have found a correlation between its atomic structure and the load-displacement (P-h) curve. We show that a density profile of a-SiC exhibits oscillations normal to the surface, analogous to liquid metal surfaces. Short-range P-h response of a-SiC is similar to that of crystalline 3C-SiC, e.g., it shows a series of load drops associated with local rearrangements of atoms. However, the load drops are less pronounced than in 3C-SiC due to lower critical stress required for rearrangement of local clusters of atoms. The nanoindentation damage is less localized than in 3C-SiC. The maximum pressure under the indenter is 60% lower than in 3C-SiC with the same system geometry. The onset of plastic deformation occurs at the depth of 0.5  Å, which is ~25% of the corresponding value in 3C-SiC. a-SiC exhibits lower damping as compared to 3C-SiC, which is reflected in the longer relaxation time of transient forces after each discrete indentation step. ©2007 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 12 April 2007; accepted 30 May 2007; published 18 July 2007
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/102/023509/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (1130 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 62.20.Mk
    Fatigue, brittleness, fracture, and cracks
  • 81.40.Np
    Fatigue, embrittlement, fracture, and failure including corrosion fatigue and cracking
  • 81.40.Lm
    Deformation, plasticity, and creep
  • 62.20.Fe
    Deformation and plasticity including yield, ductility, and superplasticity
  • 62.40.+i
    Anelasticity, internal friction, stress relaxation, and mechanical resonances
  • YEAR: 2007

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (95)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. Bhatnagar and B. J. Baliga, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 40, 645 (1993).
  2. S. J. Przybylko, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington, DC, Report AIAA 93-2581, June 1993.
  3. W. C. Trew, J.-B. Yan, and P. M. Mock, Proc. IEEE 79, 598 (1991).
  4. K. Yamada and M. Mohri, in Silicon Carbide Ceramics: 1, edited by S. Somiya and Y. Inomata (Elsevier, London, 1991).
  5. B. Gorancher, K. Reichelt, J. Chevallier, P. Hornshoj, H. Dimigen, and H. Hubsch, Thin Solid Films 139, 275 (1986).
  6. M. LeContellec, J. Richard, A. Guivrach, E. Ligeon, and J. Fontenille, Thin Solid Films 58, 407 (1979).
  7. M. Chaker et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 3191 (1992).
  8. G. M. Wells, S. Palmer, F. Cerrina, A. Purdes, and B. Gnade, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 1575 (1990).
  9. H. Windischmann, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9, 2459 (1991).
  10. D. Emin, T. L. Aselage, and C. Wood, Novel Refractory Semiconductors Symposium, Anaheim, CA, 21–23 April, 1987 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987).
  11. J. Knap and M. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 226102 (2003).
  12. G. M. Pharr, W. C. Oliver, and D. S. Harding, J. Mater. Res. 6, 1129 (1991).
  13. G. S. Smith, E. B. Tadmor, and E. Kaxiras, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1260 (2000).
  14. D. R. Clarke, M. C. Kroll, P. D. Kirchner, and R. F. Coof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2156 (1988).
  15. M. F. Doerner and W. D. Nix, J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).
  16. W. C. Oliver and G. M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).
  17. H. M. Pollock, in Handbook of Micro/Nano Tribology, edited by B. Bhushan (CRC, New York, 1995), p. 321.
  18. J. E. Bradby, J. S. Williams, and M. V. Swain, Phys. Rev. B 67, 085205 (2003).
  19. C. A. Schuh, Mater. Today 9, 32 (2006).
  20. I. Szlufarska, Mater. Today 9 (2006).
  21. I. Szlufarska, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, Science 309, 911 (2005).
  22. M. A. E. Khakani, M. Chaker, A. Jean, S. Boily, J. C. Kieffer, M. E. O'Hern, M. F. Ravet, and F. Rousseaux, J. Mater. Res. 9, 96 (1994).
  23. T. D. Raju, M. Kato, and K. Nakasa, Acta Mater. 51, 3585 (2003).
  24. C. L. Kelchner, S. J. Plimpton, and J. C. Hamilton, Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085 (1998).
  25. K. J. V. Vliet, J. Li, T. Zhu, S. Yip, and S. Suresh, Phys. Rev. B 67, 104105 (2003).
  26. A. Gouldstone, K. J. V. Vliet, and S. Suresh, Nature (London) 411, 656 (2001).
  27. J. A. Zimmerman, C. L. Kelchner, P. A. Klein, J. C. Hamilton, and S. M. Foiles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 165507 (2001).
  28. I. Szlufarska, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 378 (2004).
  29. J. B. Pethica and W. C. Oliver, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties, edited by J. C. Bravman et al., MRS Symposia Proceedings No. 130 (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1989), p. 13.
  30. T. F. Page, W. C. Oliver, and C. J. McHargue, J. Mater. Res. 7, 450 (1992).
  31. J. J. Gilman, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 675 (1973).
  32. N. Rivier, Philos. Mag. A 40, 859 (1979).
  33. W. Klement, R. H. Willens, and P. Duwez, Nature (London) 187, 869 (1960).
  34. D. B. Miracle, Nat. Mater. 3, 697 (2004).
  35. F. Albano and M. L. Falk, J. Chem. Phys. 122, 154508 (2005).
  36. Y. Shi and M. L. Falk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 095502 (2005).
  37. M. L. Falk and J. S. Langer, Phys. Rev. E 57, 7192 (1998).
  38. W. G. Stratton, J. Hamann, J. H. Perepezko, P. M. Voyles, X. Mao, and S. V. Khare, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 141910 (2005).
  39. A. S. Argon, Acta Metall. 27, 47 (1978).
  40. E. T. Lilleodden, J. A. Zimmerman, and S. M. Foiles, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 51, 901 (2003).
  41. U. Landman, W. D. Luedtke, N. A. Burnham, and R. J. Colton, Science 248, 454 (1990).
  42. J. Belak, D. B. Boercker, and I. F. Stowers, MRS Bull. 18, 55 (1993).
  43. K. Komvopoulos and W. Yan, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 4823 (1997).
  44. R. Smith, D. Christopher, and S. D. Kenny, Phys. Rev. B 67, 245405 (2003).
  45. J. S. Kallman, W. G. Hoover, C. G. Hoover, A. J. D. Groot, S. M. Lee, and F. Wooten, Phys. Rev. B 47, 7705 (1993).
  46. P. Walsh, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4332 (2000).
  47. D. W. Brenner, S. B. Sinnott, J. A. Harrison, and O. A. Shenderova, Nanotechnology 7, 161 (1996).
  48. W. C. D. Cheong and L. C. Zhang, Nanotechnology 11, 173 (2000).
  49. J. A. Harrison, C. T. White, R. J. Colton, and D. W. Brenner, Surf. Sci. 271, 57 (1992).
  50. V. B. Shenoy, R. Phillips, and E. B. Tadmor, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 48, 649 (2000).
  51. F. Dzegilenko, D. Srivastava, and S. Saini, Nanotechnology 10, 253 (1999).
  52. I. Szlufarska, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 021915 (2005).
  53. J. P. Rino, I. Ebbsjo, P. S. Braniccio, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, Phys. Rev. B 70, 045207 (2004).
  54. Y. Shi and M. L. Falk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 011914 (2005).
  55. S. B. Sinnott, R. J. Colton, C. T. White, O. A. Shenderova, D. Brenner, and J. Harrison, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 936 (1997).
  56. M. Rarivomanantsoa, P. Jund, and R. Jullien, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13 (2001).
  57. P. Vashishta, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, W. Li, and I. Ebbsjoe, Amorphous Insulators and Semiconductors, edited by M. F. Thorpe and M. I. Mitkova, NATO ASI, Series 3: Technology Vol. 23 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997), p. 151.
  58. F. H. Stillinger and T. A. Weber, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5262 (1985).
  59. Even in the most covalent materials such as Si, it has been shown [N. Bernstein and D. W. Hess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 025501 (2003)]
    60. that a purely short-range potential cannot reproduce certain material properties (e.g., brittleness during fracture) in configurations far from bulk crystals, and more recent potentials for covalent materials [A. C. T. van Duin, S. Dasgupta, F. Lorant, and W. A. Goddard, III, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9396 (2001)] do include van der Waals interactions.
  60. P. Vashishta, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and J. P. Rino, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 103515 (2007).
  61. A. Taylor and R. M. Jones, in Silicon Carbide: A High Temperature Semiconductor, edited by J. R. O'Connor and J. Smliltens (Pergamon, New York, 1960), p. 147.
  62. W. R. Lambrecht, B. Segall, M. Methfessel, and M. v. Schilfgaarde, Phys. Rev. B 44, 3685 (1991).
  63. F. Shimojo, I. Ebbsjo, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, J. P. Rino, and P. Vashishta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3338 (2000).
  64. M. Catti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 033504 (2001).
  65. J. M. Perez-Mato, M. Aroyo, C. Capillas, P. Blaha, and K. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 049603 (2003).
  66. J. R. Ray and A. Rahman, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 4243 (1985).
  67. M. Parrinello and A. Rahman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1196 (1980).
  68. G. J. Martyna, M. E. Tuckerman, D. J. Tobias, and M. L. Klein, Mol. Phys. 87, 1117 (1996).
  69. M. Tuckerman, B. J. Berne, and G. J. Martyna, J. Chem. Phys. 97 (1992).
  70. The schedule for preparing an amorphous model was shown to be important [W. D. Luedtke and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. B 40, 1164 (1989)]
    71. for the quality of the resulting structure. Our previous MD simulations of amorphous SiC [J. P. Rino, I. Ebbsjo, P. S. Branicio, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, F. Shimojo, and P. Vashishta, Phys. Rev. B 70, 045207 (2004)],
    SiO2 [A. Nakano, R. K. Kalia, and P. Vashishta, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 171, 157 (1994)],
    and Si3N4 [P. Vashistha, R. Kalia, and I. Ebbsjö, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 858 (1995)] have shown that the melt-quench method using the interatomic potential scheme in the present paper provides high-quality amorphous structures that are in excellent agreement with neutron and x-ray scattering measurements.
  71. Y. Katayama, K. Usami, and T. Shimada, Philos. Mag. B 43, 283 (1981).
  72. P. I. Rovira and F. Alvares, Phys. Rev. B 55, 4426 (1997).
  73. A. Sproul, D. R. McKenzie, and D. J. H. Cockayne, Philos. Mag. B 54, 113 (1986).
  74. A. E. Kaloyeros, R. B. Rizk, and J. B. Woodhouse, Phys. Rev. B 38, 13099 (1988).
  75. C. Meneghini, S. Pascarelli, F. Boscherini, S. Mobilio, and F. Evangelisti, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137, 75 (1991).
  76. S. Pascarelli, F. Boscherini, S. Mobilio, and F. Evangelisti, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1650 (1992).
  77. J. Seekamp and W. Bauhofer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 230, 474 (1998).
  78. P. C. Kelires and P. J. H. Denteer, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 231, 200 (1998).
  79. P. C. Kelires and P. J. H. Denteneer, Solid State Commun. 87, 851 (1993).
  80. P. C. Kelires, Phys. Rev. B 46, 10048 (1992).
  81. P. C. Kelires, Europhys. Lett. 14, 43 (1991).
  82. F. Finocchi, G. Galli, M. Parrinello, and C. M. Bertoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3044 (1992).
  83. J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 49, 16349 (1994).
  84. V. I. Ivashchenko, P. E. Turchi, V. I. Shevchenko, L. A. Ivashchenko, and G. V. Rusakov, Phys. Rev. B 66, 195201 (2002).
  85. M. Ishimaru, I. T. Bae, Y. Hirotsu, S. Matsumura, and K. E. Sickafus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 055502 (2002).
  86. J. M. Williams, C. J. McHargue, and B. R. Appleton, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 209/210, 317 (1983).
  87. T. Hioki, A. Itoh, M. Okubo, S. Noda, H. Doi, J. Kawamoto, and O. Kamigaito, J. Mater. Sci. 21, 1321 (1986).
  88. V. Heera, J. Stoemenos, R. Kogler, and W. Skorupa, J. Appl. Phys. 77, 2999 (1995).
  89. V. Heera, E. Prokert, N. Schell, H. Seifarth, W. Fukarek, M. Voelskow, and W. Skorupa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3531 (1997).
  90. We are currently examining the effects of different boundary conditions such as in J. Li, K. J. van Vilet, T. Zhu, S. Yip, and S. Suresh, Nature (London) 418, 307 (2002).
  91. This is the first step to systematically study nanoindentation of SiC, in which various physical effects are introduced step by step to discern their consequences. The second step will introduce the nonrigidity of the indenter, and the third to include attractive indenter-substrate interactions. We have applied such a systematic simulation procedure to nanoindentation in Si3N4 (P. Walsh, Ph.D. thesis, Louisiana State University, 1999).
  92. M. L. Falk, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7062 (1999).
  93. I. Ebbsjo, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 7708 (2000).
  94. J. P. Rino, I. Ebbsjo, R. K. Kalia, A. Nakano, and P. Vashishta, Phys. Rev. B 47, 3053 (1993).
  95. H. Iyetomi, P. Vashishta, and R. K. Kalia, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 262, 135 (2000).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics