Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Nanotwins and phases in high-strain Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)1−xTixO3 crystal
This work is a study of the thermal stability of (001)-cut Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)1−xTixO3 (x=0.30) single crystals before and after an electric (E)-field poling by means of dielectric permittivity, hyst...
Next Article
Determination of the orientation distribution function in aligned single wall nanotube polymer nanocomposites by polarized Raman spectroscopy
This work focuses on the derivation of the orientation distribution function (ODF) for a uniaxial-axially symmetric system using polarized Raman spectroscopy. A numerical methodology is proposed to de...

Enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol nanofluid

J. Appl. Phys. 103, 074301 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2902483

Published 2 April 2008

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

J. Garg,1 B. Poudel,2 M. Chiesa,1 J. B. Gordon,1 J. J. Ma,1 J. B. Wang,4 Z. F. Ren,2 Y. T. Kang,5 H. Ohtani,3 J. Nanda,3 G. H. McKinley,1 and G. Chen1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
2Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA
3Materials and Nanotechnology Department, Research and Advanced Engineering, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan 48121, USA
4School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, People's Republic of China
5School of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Kyung Hee University, South Korea

This study investigates the thermal conductivity and viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol. The nanofluid was prepared by synthesizing copper nanoparticles using a chemical reduction method, with water as the solvent, and then dispersing them in ethylene glycol using a sonicator. Volume loadings of up to 2% were prepared. The measured increase in thermal conductivity was twice the value predicted by the Maxwell effective medium theory. The increase in viscosity was about four times of that predicted by the Einstein law of viscosity. Analytical calculations suggest that this nanofluid would not be beneficial as a coolant in heat exchangers without changing the tube diameter. However, increasing the tube diameter to exploit the increased thermal conductivity of the nanofluid can lead to better thermal performance. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 22 October 2007; accepted 22 January 2008; published 2 April 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/103/074301/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (351 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 81.07.Bc
    Nanocrystalline materials: fabrication and characterization
  • 72.15.Eb
    Electrical and thermal conduction in crystalline metals and alloys
  • 65.80.+n
    Thermal properties of small particles, nanocrystals, nanotubes
  • 66.20.-d
    Viscosity of liquids; diffusive momentum transport
  • YEAR: 2008

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (27)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. A. S. Ahuja, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 3408 (1975).
  2. K. V. Liu, S. U. S. Choi, and K. E. Kasza, Argonne National Laboratory Report No. ANL-88-15 3, 1988.
  3. H. Masuda, A. Ebata, K. Teramae, and N. Hishinuma, Netsu Bussei 4, 227 (1993).
  4. S. U. S. Choi, Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1995 (unpublished), Vol. 66, p. 99.
  5. J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism (Clarendon, Oxford, 1891).
  6. P. Keblinski, J. A. Eastman, and D. G. Cahill, Mater. Today 8, 36 (2005).
  7. X. Wang and A. S. Majumdar, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 46, 1 (2007).
  8. R. Prasher, P. Bhattacharya, and P. E. Phelan, J. Heat Transfer 128, 589 (2006).
  9. W. Evans, J. Fish, and P. Keblinski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 093116 (2006).
  10. J. Koo and C. Kleinstreuer, J. Nanopart. Res. 6, 577 (2004).
  11. P. Keblinski, S. R. Phillpot, S. U. S. Choi, and J. A. Eastman, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 45, 855 (2002).
  12. L. Xue, P. Keblinski, S. R. Phillpot, S. U.-S. Choi, and J. A. Eastman, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 4277 (2004).
  13. P. Ben-Abdallah, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 113117 (2006).
  14. R. Prasher, P. E. Phelan, and P. Bhattacharya, Nano Lett. 6, 1529 (2006).
  15. H. Zhu, C. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Tang, and Y. Yin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 023123 (2006).
  16. R. Prasher, W. Evans, P. Meakin, J. Fish, P. Phelan, and P. Keblinski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 143119 (2006).
  17. J. A. Eastman, S. U. S. Choi, S. Li, W. Yu, and L. J. Thompson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 718 (2001).
  18. H. Zhu, C. Zhang, and Y. Yin, J. Cryst. Growth 270, 722 (2004).
  19. M. Liu, M. C. Lin, C. Y. Tsai, and C. Wang, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 49, 3028 (2006).
  20. T. S. Chow, Phys. Rev. E 48, 1977 (1993).
  21. Y. Nagasaka and A. Nagashima, J. Phys. E 14, 1435 (1981).
  22. J. Ma, M.S. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2006.
  23. C. W. Nan, R. Birringer, D. R. Clarke, and H. Gleiter, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6692 (1997).
  24. A. Minnich and G. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 073105 (2007).
  25. S. Lee, S. U. S. Choi, S. Li, and J. A. Eastman, J. Heat Transfer 121, 280 (1999).
  26. R. Prasher, D. Song, and J. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 133108 (2006).
  27. F. P. Incropera and D. P. Dewitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (Wiley, New York, 1996).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.