Nucleation energetics during homogeneous solidification in elemental metallic liquids
J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033506 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.2961329
Published 1 August 2008
You are logged in to this journal.
The solidification of a liquid by nucleation is an important first order phase transition process. It is known that in order for elemental liquids to solidify homogeneously, it is necessary to supercool the liquid to a characteristic temperature (TUC) below the thermodynamic melting point (TMP). Approximately 60 years ago Turnbull [J. Appl. Phys. 21, 1022 (1950)] established the empirical rule that
T*=|TUC−TMP| is approximately given by 0.18 TMP for several elemental metallic liquids. We show here that the magnitude of
T* and TUC for the metals can be accurately predicted from classical nucleation theory (CNT) provided the excess volume resulting from the density difference between liquid and solid be accounted for. Specifically, the density change accompanying the formation of a microscopic nucleus of the solid from the liquid results in a volume change in the surrounding liquid. When this is included in the free energy calculations within CNT, the resulting predictions for
T* and TUC for several metals with TMP ranging from ~200 to 2900 K are in very good agreement with experimental measurements. This theory also shows that there is a universal character in the minimum nucleation barrier energy and the critical radius. The minimum barrier energy occurs at temperature TN~0.27 TMP for all the elemental liquids investigated, while the temperature dependencies of the barrier energy and the critical radius appear identical when expressed as a function of the scaled temperature TUC/TMP.
©2008 American Institute of Physics
T*=|TUC−TMP| is approximately given by 0.18 TMP for several elemental metallic liquids. We show here that the magnitude of
T* and TUC for the metals can be accurately predicted from classical nucleation theory (CNT) provided the excess volume resulting from the density difference between liquid and solid be accounted for. Specifically, the density change accompanying the formation of a microscopic nucleus of the solid from the liquid results in a volume change in the surrounding liquid. When this is included in the free energy calculations within CNT, the resulting predictions for
T* and TUC for several metals with TMP ranging from ~200 to 2900 K are in very good agreement with experimental measurements. This theory also shows that there is a universal character in the minimum nucleation barrier energy and the critical radius. The minimum barrier energy occurs at temperature TN~0.27 TMP for all the elemental liquids investigated, while the temperature dependencies of the barrier energy and the critical radius appear identical when expressed as a function of the scaled temperature TUC/TMP.
©2008 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 23 March 2008; accepted 22 May 2008; published 1 August 2008 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/104/033506/1 |
REFERENCES (31)
-
F. H. Ludlam, Nature (London) 177, 321 (1956).
-
F. Franks, J. Darlington, T. Schenz, S. F. Mathias, L. Slade, and H. Levine, Nature (London) 325, 146 (1987).
-
R. F. Wood, D. H. Lowndes, and J. Narayan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 44, 770 (1984). [ISI]
-
S. Vaddiraju, A. Mohite, A. Chin, M. Meyyappan, G. Sumanasekera, B. Alphenaar, and M. Sunkara, Nano Lett. 5, 1625 (2005). [MEDLINE]
-
D. Bera, S. Kuiry, and S. Seal, JOM 56, 49 (2004).
-
P. Muralt, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 051605 (2006).
-
A. Gangopadhyay, H. Krishna, C. Favazza, C. Miller, and R. Kalyanaraman, Nanotechnology 18, 485606 (2007).
-
D. A. Porter and K. E. Easterling , Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 2nd ed. (Chapman and Hall, London, 1992).
-
J. Christian , The Theory of Transformations in Metals and Alloys: An Advanced Textbook in Physical Metallurgy (Pergamon, Oxford, 1965).
-
K. F. Kelton , Crystal Nucleation in Liquids and Gases, Advances in Research and Applications Vol. 45 (Academic, New York, 1991), Chap. 2, pp. 75–178.
-
B. -G. Liu, J. Wu, E. G. Wang, and Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1195 (1999). [ISI]
-
D. M. Sadler and G. H. Gilmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2708 (1986). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
-
R. Lopez, T. E. Haynes, L. A. Boatner, L. C. Feldman, and R. F. Haglund, Phys. Rev. B 65, 224113 (2002).
-
R. Lopez, L. C. Feldman, and J. R. F. Haglund, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 177403 (2004). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
-
S. -N. Luo and T. J. Ahrens, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1836 (2003).
-
X. -M. Bai and M. Li, Phys. Rev. B 72, 052108 (2005). [ISI]
-
D. G. Fahrenheit, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 33, 78 (1724).
-
D. Turnbull, J. Appl. Phys. 21, 1022 (1950).
-
D. Turnbull and R. E. Cech, J. Appl. Phys. 21, 804 (1950). [ISI]
-
B. Vinet, L. Cortella, J. J. Favier, and P. Desre, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 97 (1991). [ISI]
-
B. Vinet, Int. J. Thermophys. 20, 1061 (1999).
-
P. G. Debenedetti , Metastable Liquids (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1996), Chap. 3, pp. 147–234.
-
A. T. Dinsdale, CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem. 15, 317 (1991).
-
Smithells Metals Reference Book, 8th ed., edited by W. Gale and T. Totemeier (Elsevier, New York, 2004).
-
A. Cavagna, A. Attanasi, and J. Lorenzana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 115702 (2005). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
-
A. V. Gorshkov, Inorg. Mater. 36, 218 (2000).
-
S. Blair, Int. Mater. Rev. 52, 323 (2007).
-
T. Scopigno, U. Balucani, G. Ruocco, and F. Sette, Phys. Rev. E 65, 031205 (2002).
-
W. E. Frazier , “Empirical and Semi-Empirical Relationships of Liquid-Vapor, Solid-Vapor, and Solid-Liquid Surface Energies,” Naval Air Warfare Center, Aircraft Division Warminster, Technical Report No. 18974-0591, 1993.
-
P. -F. Paradis, T. Ishikawa, and S. Yoda, Int. J. Thermophys. 23, 555 (2002). [Inspec] [ISI]
-
P. -F. Paradis, T. Ishikawa, and S. Yoda, J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 36, 5125 (2001).


x


