Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Influence of a preplasma on electron heating and proton acceleration in ultraintense laser-foil interaction
Two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations are performed to study laser-induced proton acceleration from solid-density targets in the presence of laser-generated preformed plasma. The preplasma gene...
Next Article
Chaotic characteristics of corona discharges in atmospheric air
A point-plane electrode system in atmospheric air is established to investigate the mechanism of the corona discharge. By using this system, the current pulses of the corona discharges under the 50 Hz...

Energy and angle spectra of sputtered particles for low-energy deuterium impact of deuterated amorphous carbon

J. Appl. Phys. 104, 103308 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.3028205

Published 21 November 2008

You are logged in to this journal.

P. S. Krstic,1 C. O. Reinhold,1 and S. J. Stuart2
1Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6372, USA
2Department of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA

We study the translational, vibrational, and rotational energy spectra of atoms and molecules reflected or sputtered from deuterated amorphous carbon surfaces by impact of low-energy (1–30 eV) deuterium atoms. Both the rovibrational and translational energies of sputtered deuterium molecules are found to be close to 1 eV over the whole impact energy range, with approximate equipartition between rotational and vibrational modes, particularly at the higher impact energies. Sputtered carbon-containing molecules are vibrationally energetic, with rovibrational energies in the range of 1.5–2.5 eV; translational and rotational motions are less energetic, close to 0.5 eV, but hotter, with more energy per degree of freedom. The energy distributions of ejected molecules confirm the partial thermalization of the impact cascade. We also study the angular spectrum of the velocity of the outgoing particles as well as their angular momentum. While the velocity vectors are described well by a cosine distribution, a preferred direction of rotation is found at the lowest energies, with the angular momenta preferentially oriented parallel to the surface. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 23 May 2008; accepted 8 October 2008; published 21 November 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/104/103308/1
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (887 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 34.35.+a
    Interactions of atoms and molecules with surfaces
  • 33.15.Mt
    Molecular rotation, vibration, and vibration-rotation constants
  • YEAR: 2008

RELATED DATABASES

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (29)

  1. W. P. West, B. Goldsmith, T. E. Evans, and R. J. Olson, Atomic Physics Processes Important to the Understanding of the Scrape-off Layer of Tokamaks, General Atomic Report No. GA-A23960, 2002.
  2. P. S. Krstic, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042717 (2002). [ISI]
  3. R. K. Janev, Contrib. Plasma Phys. 38, 307 (1998). [Inspec] [ISI]
  4. A. Yu. Pigarov, Phys. Scr., T T96, 16 (2002).
  5. A. S. Kukushkin, H. D. Pacher, V. Kotov, D. Reiter, D. Coster, and G. W. Pacher, Nucl. Fusion 45, 608 (2005). [ISI]
  6. P. K. Browning, U. Fantz, K. J. Gibson, B. Mihaljcic, and D. Wunderlich, J. Nucl. Mater. 337–339, 232 (2005). [Inspec]
  7. R. K. Janev, Phys. Scr., T T96, 94 (2002).
  8. S. I. Krasheninnikov, A. Yu Pigarov, and D. J. Sigmar, Phys. Lett. A 214, 285 (1996).
  9. T. P. Snow and V. M. Bierbaum, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1, 229 (2008).
  10. S. Lepp, P. C. Stancil, and A. Dalgarno, J. Phys. B 35, R57 (2002).
  11. P. S. Krstic, C. O. Reinhold, and S. J. Stuart, New J. Phys. 9, 209 (2007).
  12. E. Salonen, K. Nordlund, J. Keinonen, and C. H. Wu, Phys. Rev. B 63, 195415 (2001).
  13. E. Salonen, “Molecular dynamics studies of the chemical sputtering of carbon-based materials by hydrogen bombardment,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki Report Series in Physics No. HU-P-D97, 2002, available online at http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/.
  14. J. Marian, L. A. Zepeda-Ruiz, G. H. Gilmer, E. M. Bringa, and T. Rognlien, Phys. Scr., T T124, 65 (2006).
  15. P. Träskelin, K. Nordlund, and J. Keinonen, J. Nucl. Mater. 357, 1 (2006). [Inspec]
  16. J. Marian, L. A. Zepeda-Ruiz, N. Couto, E. M. Bringa, G. H. Gilmer, P. C. Stangeby, and T. D. Rognlien, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 044506 (2007). [ISI]
  17. D. W. Brenner, O. A. Shenderova, J. A. Harrison, S. J. Stuart, B. Ni, and S. A. Sinnott, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 783 (2002).
  18. J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6991 (1988). [MEDLINE]
  19. W. R. Wampler and D. K. Brice, J. Nucl. Mater. 102, 304 (1981). [ISI]
  20. P. S. Krstic, S. J. Stuart, and C. O. Reinhold, AIP Conf. Proc. 876, 201 (2006).
  21. S. J. Stuart, P. S. Krstic, T. A. Embry, and C. O. Reinhold, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 255, 202 (2007).
  22. C. O. Reinhold, P. S. Krstic, and S. J. Stuart, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 258, 274 (2007).
  23. P. S. Krstic, C. O. Reinhold, and S. J. Stuart, Europhys. Lett. 77, 33002 (2007).
  24. J. P. Biersack and W. Eckstein, Appl. Phys. A: Solids Surf. 34, 73 (1984). [Inspec]
  25. P. Sigmund, Top. Appl. Phys. 47, 9 (1979).
  26. H. Gnaser, Top. Appl. Phys. 110, 231 (2007).
  27. S. Bouneau, S. Della Negra, D. Jacquet, Y. Le Beyec, M. Pautrat, M. H. Shapiro, and T. A. Tombrello, Phys. Rev. B 71, 174110 (2005). [ISI]
  28. H. R. Griem, Principles of Plasma Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1997).
  29. F. Iza, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 32, 498 (2004).