Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Magnetic ordering of the Fe/Si interface and its initial formation
High-resolution photoelectron spectroscopy with synchrotron radiation and magnetic linear dichroism in Fe 3p core-level photoemission has been used to study both the initial stages of Fe/Si(111)7&time...
Next Article
Optical properties of Yb3+ doped Lu3Al5O12 crystal fibers grown by µ-pulling down technique
Yb doped Lu3Al5O12 single crystal fibers has been grown with various Yb3+ ion concentrations: 2%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 50% Yb doping levels. The diameter of the fibers is around 3  mm and their...

Charge dynamics in ionic polymer metal composites

J. Appl. Phys. 104, 104915 (2008); doi:10.1063/1.3017467

Published 24 November 2008

You are logged in to this journal.

Maurizio Porfiri
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Brooklyn, New York 11201, USA
In this paper, we study the charge dynamics in ionic polymer metal composites (IPMCs) in response to a voltage difference applied across their electrodes. We use the Poisson–Nernst–Planck equations to model the time evolution of the electric potential and the concentration of mobile counterions. We present an analytical solution of the nonlinear initial-boundary value problem by using matched asymptotic expansions. We determine the charge and electric potential distributions as functions of time in the whole IPMC region. We show that in the bulk polymer region the IPMC is approximately electroneutral; in contrast, charge distribution boundary layers arise at the polymer-electrode interfaces. Prominent charge depletion and enrichment at the polymer-electrode interface are present even at moderately low input-voltage levels. We use the proposed analytical solution to derive a physics-based circuit model of IPMCs. The equivalent circuit comprises a linear resistor in series connection with a nonlinear capacitor. We derive closed-form expressions for the resistance and the capacitance by conducting a qualitative phase-plane analysis of the inner approximation of the asymptotic expansion. The circuit conductivity is independent of the IPMC dielectric constant and is proportional to the ion diffusivity; whereas, the capacitance is proportional to the square root of the dielectric constant and is independent of the diffusivity. The conductivity depends on the polymer thickness, while the capacitance is independent of it. The capacitance nonlinearity is extremely pronounced, and dramatic capacitance reduction is observed for moderately low voltage levels. We validate the proposed analytical solution along with the derived circuit model through extensive comparisons with finite element results available in the technical literature. ©2008 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 7 July 2008; accepted 24 September 2008; published 24 November 2008
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/104/104915/1
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (267 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS

RELATED DATABASES

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (30)

  1. P. G. de Gennes, K. Okumura, M. Shahinpoor, and K. J. Kim, Europhys. Lett. 50, 513 (2000). [Inspec] [ISI]
  2. S. Tadokoro, S. Yamagami, and T. Takamori, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, 2000 (unpublished), pp. 1340–1346.
  3. S. Nemat-Nasser and J. Y. Li, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 3321 (2000).
  4. S. Nemat-Nasser, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2899 (2002).
  5. P. J. Costa Branco and J. A. Dente, Smart Mater. Struct. 15, 378 (2006).
  6. G. Del Bufalo, L. Placidi, and M. Porfiri, Smart Mater. Struct. 17(4), 045010 (2008).
  7. Z. Chen and X. Tan, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 13(5), 519 (2008). [Inspec]
  8. K. Farinholt and D. J. Leo, Mech. Mater. 36, 421 (2004). [Inspec]
  9. Z. Chen, X. Tan, A. Will, and C. Ziel, Smart Mater. Struct. 16, 1477 (2007).
  10. T. Wallmersperger, B. Kroplin, and R. W. Gulch, Mech. Mater. 36, 411 (2004).
  11. T. Wallmersperger, D. J. Leo, and C. S. Kothera, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 024912 (2007).
  12. T. Wallmersperger, B. J. Akle, D. J. Leo, and B. Kroplin, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 1173 (2008). [Inspec]
  13. M. Z. Bazant, K. Thornton, and A. Ajdari, Phys. Rev. E 70, 021506 (2004). [MEDLINE]
  14. G. Shen, N. Tarcero, M. A. Gaspar, B. Varughese, K. Shepard, and R. Levicky, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 8427 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  15. B. Eisenberg and W. Liu, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 38, 1932 (2007).
  16. M. Van Dyke, Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics (The Parabolic, Stanford, CA, 1975).
  17. A. H. Nayfeh, Introduction to Perturbation Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1981).
  18. I. V. Andrianov and L. I. Manevitch, Asymptotic Approaches in Nonlinear Dynamics (Sprinder-Verlag, New York, 1998).
  19. M. S. Kilic and M. Z. Bazant, Phys. Rev. E 75, 021502 (2007). [ISI]
  20. M. S. Kilic and M. Z. Bazant, Phys. Rev. E 75, 021503 (2007). [ISI]
  21. Y. K. Suh and S. Kang, Phys. Rev. E 77, 031504 (2008).
  22. N. Abaid, R. S. Eisenberg, and W. Liu, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. (to be published).
  23. R. Kanno, S. Tadokoro, T. Takamori, and M. Hattori, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996 (unpublished), pp. 219–225.
  24. J. Paquette, K. Kim, J. -D. Nam, and Y. Tak, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 14, 633 (2003). [Inspec]
  25. C. Bonomo, L. Fortuna, P. Giannone, and S. Graziani, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. 53, 338 (2006).
  26. A. Punning, M. Kruusmaa, and A. Aabloo, Sens. Actuators, A 133, 200 (2007).
  27. K. Newbury and D. J. Leo, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 14, 333 (2003). [Inspec] [ISI]
  28. K. Newbury and D. J. Leo, J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 14, 343 (2003). [ISI]
  29. A. J. Bard and L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2001).
  30. V. I. Arnol'd, Ordinary Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991).