Direct imaging of current-driven domain walls in ferromagnetic nanostripes
J. Appl. Phys. 105, 103902 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3125526
Published 21 May 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
To better understand the response of domain walls to current-induced spin transfer torques, we have directly imaged the internal magnetic structure of domain walls in current-carrying ferromagnetic nanostripes. Domain wall images were acquired both while a constant current was flowing through the wire, and after applying current pulses. Domain walls ranging from vortex walls in wide (1 µm) wires to transverse walls in narrow (100 nm) wires were quantitatively analyzed using scanning electron microscopy with polarization analysis. The domain wall motion is characterized by strong interactions with random pinning sites along the wire. The walls either jump with the electron flow between pinning sites, or the pinned walls are distorted by the current. The domain wall propagation is also associated with transverse motion of the vortex core.
| History: | Received 27 January 2009; accepted 2 April 2009; published 21 May 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/105/103902/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (51)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 2156 (1978).
- P. P. Freitas and L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 1266 (1985).
- S. S. P. Parkin, M. Hayashi, and L. Thomas,
Science 320, 190 (2008) . - L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1954 (1984).
- L. Gan, S. H. Chung, K. H. Aschenbach, M. Dreyer, and R. D. Gomez,
IEEE Trans. Magn. 36, 3047 (2000) . - H. Koo, C. Krafft, and R. D. Gomez, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 862 (2002).
- M. Klaui, C. A. F. Vaz, J. A. C. Bland, W. Wernsdorfer, G. Faini, E. Cambril, and L. J. Heyderman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 105 (2003).
- J. Grollier, P. Boulenc, V. Cros, A. Hamzic, A. Vaures, A. Fert, and G. Faini, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 509 (2003).
- M. Tsoi, R. E. Fontana, and S. S. P. Parkin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 2617 (2003).
- N. Vernier, D. A. Allwood, D. Atkinson, M. D. Cooke, and R. P. Cowburn,
Europhys. Lett. 65, 526 (2004) . - M. Yamanouchi, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno,
Nature (London) 428, 539 (2004) . - A. Yamaguchi, T. Ono, S. Nasu, K. Miyake, K. Mibu, and T. Shinjo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 077205 (2004).
- C. K. Lim, T. Devolder, C. Chappert, J. Grollier, V. Cros, A. Vaurès, A. Fert, and G. Faini, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2820 (2004).
- S. H. Florez, C. Krafft, and R. D. Gomez, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10C705 (2005).
- M. Kläui, P. -O. Jubert, R. Allenspach, A. Bischof, J. A. C. Bland, G. Faini, U. Rüdiger, C. A. F. Vaz, L. Vila, and C. Vouille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 026601 (2005).
- M. Kläui, M. Laufenberg, L. Heyne, D. Backes, U. Rüdiger, C. A. F. Vaz, J. A. C. Bland, L. J. Heyderman, S. Cherifi, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes, and L. Aballe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 232507 (2006).
- G. S. D. Beach, C. Knutson, C. Nistor, M. Tsoi, and J. L. Erskine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 057203 (2006).
- M. Hayashi, L. Thomas, C. Rettner, R. Moriya, X. Jiang, and S. S. P. Parkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 207205 (2006).
- S. Q. Yang and J. L. Erskine, Phys. Rev. B 75, 220403 (2007).
- G. Meier, M. Bolte, R. Eiselt, B. Krüger, D. H. Kim, and P. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 187202 (2007).
- G. S. D. Beach, M. Tsoi, and J. L. Erskine,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1272 (2008) . - L. Berger, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9353 (1996).
- L. Berger, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4880 (1997).
- J. C. Slonczewski,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159, L1 (1996) . - J. C. Slonczewski,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195(2), 261 (1999) . - M. D. Stiles and A. Zangwill, Phys. Rev. B 66, 014407 (2002).
- G. Tatara and H. Kohno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 086601 (2004).
- X. Waintal and M. Viret,
Europhys. Lett. 65, 427 (2004) . - Z. Li and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 207203 (2004).
- S. Zhang, P. M. Levy, and A. Fert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 236601 (2002).
- S. Zhang and Z. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 127204 (2004).
- Z. Li and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 70, 024417 (2004).
- A. Thiaville, Y. Nakatani, J. Miltat, and N. Vernier, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 7049 (2004).
- A. Thiaville, Y. Nakatani, J. Miltat, and Y. Suzuki,
Europhys. Lett. 69, 990 (2005) . - S. E. Barnes and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 107204 (2005).
- J. He, Z. Li, and S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 73, 184408 (2006).
- J. Shibata, Y. Nakatani, G. Tatara, H. Kohno, and Y. Otani, Phys. Rev. B 73, 020403(R) (2006).
- J. A. Xiao, A. Zangwill, and M. D. Stiles, Phys. Rev. B 73, 054428 (2006).
- M. D. Stiles, W. M. Saslow, M. J. Donahue, and A. Zangwill, Phys. Rev. B 75, 214423 (2007).
- D. C. Ralph and M. D. Stiles,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1190 (2008) . - M. R. Scheinfein, J. Unguris, M. H. Kelley, D. T. Pierce, and R. J. Celotta, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 2501 (1990).
- J. Unguris, in Magnetic Imaging and Its Applications to Materials, edited by M. De Graef and Y. Zhu (Academic, Burlington, MA, 2000), Vol. 36.
- R. D. McMichael and M. J. Donahue,
IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 4167 (1997) . - Y. Nakatani, A. Thiaville, and J. Miltat,
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 290-291, 750 (2005) . - O. Tchernyshyov and G. W. Chern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 197204 (2005).
- M. J. Donahue and D. J. Porter, OOMMF's User Guide, Version 1.0, NISTIR 6376 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999).
- In the simulations: cell size=2×2×12 nm3, Ms=8×105 A/m, A=10×10−12 J/m, and an easy axis anisotropy of 50 mT are included to match the experimental wall width.
- L. Heyne, M. Klaui, D. Backes, T. A. Moore, S. Krzyk, U. Rudiger, L. J. Heyderman, A. F. Roriguez, F. Nolting, T. O. Mentes, M. A. Nino, A. Locatelli, K. Kirsch, and R. Mattheis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 066603 (2008).
- S. -M. Seo, K. -J. Lee, W. -K. Kim, and T. -D. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 252508 (2007).
- A. Vanhaverbeke, A. Bischof, and R. Allenspach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 107202 (2008).
- A. Hubert and R. Schäfer, Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998).







