Journal of Applied Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Monte Carlo simulation on ferroelectric response to magnetic field in an elastic Ising spin chain
The fantastic ferroelectric response to the magnetic field observed in Ca3CoMnO6 compound, where the ferroelectricity is driven by the collinear magnetism, is investigated by using Monte Carlo simulat...
Next Article
Effects of target bias voltage in magnetic tunnel junctions grown by ion beam deposition
Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) with an AlOx barrier were fabricated by a biased target ion beam deposition (BTIBD) sputtering technique using a low energy ion source (0–50 eV) and voltage bias...

Structural, magnetic, and transport properties of laser-annealed GaAs:Mn–H

J. Appl. Phys. 106, 013904 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3153943

Published 2 July 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

R. Farshchi,1,2 D. J. Hwang,3 N. Misra,3 C. C. Julaton, III,2 K. M. Yu,2 C. P. Grigoropoulos,3,4 and O. D. Dubon1,2
1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
2Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laser Thermal Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
4Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

We have investigated the effect of laser annealing on the structural, magnetic, and transport properties of hydrogenated Ga0.96Mn0.04As films. Irradiation with nanosecond laser pulses leads to significant recovery of hole-mediated ferromagnetism in these films. By tuning processing parameters such as laser fluence and number of pulses, one can control the electrical and magnetic properties—namely, resistivity, magnetic coercivity, and remnant magnetization—in the laser-activated region. Ion-beam analysis indicates that the structural integrity of the film is maintained upon hydrogenation and laser annealing with evidence for displacement of substitutional Mn ions toward interstitial sites due to hydrogen-complex formation. Laser annealing results in the relaxation of up to 50% of Mn atoms back to substitutional sites while the Curie temperature recovers to ~60% of the TC prior to hydrogenation. Subsequent thermal annealing results in full relocation of Mn atoms to substitutional sites, yet the TC remains pinned at ~60% of its original value, suggesting the formation of a defect complex involving substitutional Mn. Our numerical simulations elucidate the strong interplay between laser processing parameters and Mn–H dissociation. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 9 April 2009; accepted 18 May 2009; published 2 July 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/013904/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (556 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 75.70.Ak
    Magnetic properties of monolayers and thin films
  • 68.55.Ln
    Thin film defects and impurities
  • 73.61.Ey
    Electrical properties of III-V semiconductors (thin films)
  • 61.80.Ba
    Ultraviolet, visible, and infrared radiation effects
  • 75.60.Ej
    Magnetization curves, hysteresis, Barkhausen and related effects
  • 75.30.Kz
    Magnetic phase boundaries
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (25)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Molnar, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Science 294, 1488 (2001).
  2. A. H. Macdonald, P. Schiffer, and N. Samarth, Nature Mater. 4, 195 (2005).
  3. H. Ohno, Science 281, 951 (1998).
  4. D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 162505 (2006).
  5. Y. Satoh, D. Okazawa, A. Nagashima, and J. Yoshino, Physica E (Amsterdam) 10, 196 (2001).
  6. M. A. Scarpulla, U. Daud, K. M. Yu, O. Monteiro, Z. Liliental-Weber, D. Zakharov, W. Walukiewicz, and O. D. Dubon, Physica B 340–342, 908 (2003).
  7. S. U. Yuldashev, H. C. Jeon, H. S. Im, T. W. Kang, S. H. Lee, and J. K. Furdyna, Phys. Rev. B 70, 193203 (2004).
  8. M. A. Scarpulla, P. R. Stone, I. D. Sharp, E. E. Haller, O. D. Dubon, J. W. Beeman, and K. M. Yu, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 123906 (2008).
  9. R. Bouanani-Rahbi, B. Clerjaud, B. Theys, A. Lemaitre, and F. Jomard, Physica B 340–342, 284 (2003).
  10. S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. A. Wassner, H. Huebl, M. S. Brandt, J. B. Philipp, M. Opel, R. Gross, A. Koeder, W. Schoch, and A. Waag, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 227202 (2004).
  11. M. S. Brandt, S. T. B. Goennenwein, T. A. Wassner, F. Kohl, A. Lehner, H. Huebl, T. Graf, M. Stutzmann, A. Koeder, W. Schoch, and A. Waag, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2277 (2004).
  12. L. Thevenard, L. Largeau, O. Mauguin, A. Lemaitre, and B. Theys, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 182506 (2005).
  13. R. Farshchi, O. D. Dubon, D. J. Hwang, N. Misra, C. P. Grigoropoulos, and P. D. Ashby, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 012517 (2008).
  14. C. Bihler, M. Kraus, M. S. Brandt, S. T. B. Goennenwein, M. Opel, M. A. Scarpulla, R. Farshchi, D. M. Estrada, and O. D. Dubon, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 013908 (2008).
  15. S. J. Pearton, J. W. Corbett, and M. Stavola, Hydrogen in Crystalline Semiconductors (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992).
  16. M. A. Scarpulla, O. D. Dubon, K. M. Yu, O. Monteiro, M. R. Pillai, M. J. Aziz, and M. C. Ridgway, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1251 (2003).
  17. M. A. Scarpulla, R. Farshchi, P. R. Stone, R. V. Chopdekar, K. M. Yu, Y. Suzuki, and O. D. Dubon, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 073913 (2008).
  18. F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, A. Shen, and Y. Sugawara, Phys. Rev. B 57, R2037 (1998).
  19. S. J. Jeng, G. S. Oehrlein, and G. J. Scilla, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 1735 (1988).
  20. K. M. Yu, W. Walukiewicz, T. Wojtowicz, I. Kuryliszyn, X. Liu, Y. Sasaki, and J. K. Furdyna, Phys. Rev. B 65, 201303(R) (2002).
  21. J. S. Blakemore, J. Appl. Phys. 53, R123 (1982).
  22. P. D. Maycock, Solid-State Electron. 10, 161 (1967).
  23. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic, New York, 1985).
  24. R. A. Morrow, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 2973 (1989).
  25. J. C. Mikkelsen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 46, 882 (1985).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.