Journal of Applied Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Electrically controlled reflection bands in a cholesteric liquid crystals slab
We considered a cholesteric slab whose axis is normal to their borders, when a uniform electric field is perpendicularly applied to the helix axis. We found the solution of the boundary value problem ...
Next Article
Application of nanoparticle-containing laser plasmas for optical harmonic generation
Nanoparticle-containing media can be used for efficient high-order harmonic generation of laser radiation. We present the results of studies of the harmonics generated in the laser-produced plasmas co...

Pulse shaping and energy storage capabilities of angularly multiplexed KrF laser fusion drivers

J. Appl. Phys. 106, 023103 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3174444

Published 23 July 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

R. H. Lehmberg,1 J. L. Giuliani,2 and A. J. Schmitt2
1Research Support Instruments, Inc., Lanham, Maryland 20706, USA
2Plasma Physics Division, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375, USA

This paper describes a rep-rated multibeam KrF laser driver design for the 500  kJ Inertial Fusion test Facility (FTF) recently proposed by NRL, then models its optical pulse shaping capabilities using the ORESTES laser kinetics code. It describes a stable and reliable iteration technique for calculating the required precompensated input pulse shape that will achieve the desired output shape, even when the amplifiers are heavily saturated. It also describes how this precompensation technique could be experimentally implemented in real time on a reprated laser system. The simulations show that this multibeam system can achieve a high fidelity pulse shaping capability, even for a high gain shock ignition pulse whose final spike requires output intensities much higher than the ~4  MW/cm2 saturation levels associated with quasi-cw operation; i.e., they show that KrF can act as a storage medium even for pulsewidths of ~1  ns. For the chosen pulse, which gives a predicted fusion energy gain of ~120, the simulations predict the FTF can deliver a total on-target energy of 428  kJ, a peak spike power of 385  TW, and amplified spontaneous emission prepulse contrast ratios IASE/I<3×10−7 in intensity and FASE/F<1.5×10−5 in fluence. Finally, the paper proposes a front-end pulse shaping technique that combines an optical Kerr gate with cw 248  nm light and a 1  µm control beam shaped by advanced fiber optic technology, such as the one used in the National Ignition Facility (NIF) laser. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 15 May 2009; accepted 11 June 2009; published 23 July 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/023103/1

Submit to JRSE

BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (719 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 28.52.Cx
    Fusion reactor fueling, heating and ignition
  • 28.52.Lf
    Fusion reactor components and instrumentation
  • 52.57.Kk
    Fast laser ignition of compressed fusion fuels
  • 52.50.Jm
    Plasma production and heating by laser beams
  • 42.65.Re
    Ultrafast processes; optical pulse generation and pulse compression
  • 42.55.Lt
    Gas lasers including excimer and metal-vapor lasers
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (26)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. S. E. Bodner, D. G. Colombant, J. H. Gardner, R. H. Lehmberg, S. P. Obenschain, L. Phillips, A. J. Schmitt, J. D. Sethian, R. L. McCrory, W. Seka, C. P. Verdon, J. P. Knauer, B. B. Afeyan, and H. T. Powell, Phys. Plasmas 5, 1901 (1998).
  2. R. Betti, C. D. Zhou, K. S. Anderson, L. J. Perkins, W. Theobald, and A. A. Solodov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 155001 (2007);
  3. R. Betti, W. Theobald, C. D. Zhou, K. S. Anderson, P. W. McKenty, S. Skupsky, D. Shvarts, V. N. Goncharov, J. A. Delettrez, R. B. Radha, T. C. Sangster, C. Stoeckl, and D. D. Meyerhofer, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 112, 022024 (2008).
  4. C. A. Haynam et al., Appl. Opt. 46, 3276 (2007).
  5. S. P. Obenschain, S. E. Bodner, D. Colombant, K. Gerber, R. H. Lehmberg, E. A. McLean, A. N. Mostovych, M. S. Pronko, C. J. Pawley, A. J. Schmitt, J. D. Sethian, V. Serlin, J. A. Stamper, C. A. Sullivan, J. P. Dahlburg, J. H. Gardner, Y. Chan, A. V. Deniz, J. Hardgrove, T. Lehecka, and M. Klapisch, Phys. Plasmas 3, 2098 (1996).
  6. M. F. Wolford, M. C. Myers, J. L. Giuliani, J. D. Sethian, P. M. Burns, F. Hegeler, and R. Jaynes, Opt. Eng. (Bellingham) 47, 104202 (2008);
  7. Proc. SPIE 6454, 645407 (2007);
    J. D. Sethian, M. C. Myers, J. L. Giuliani, R. H. Lehmberg, P. C. Kepple, S. P. Obenschain, F. Hegeler, M. Friedman, M. F. Wolford, R. V. Smilgys, S. B. Swanekamp, D. Weidenheimer, D. Giorgi, D. Welch, D. V. Rose, and S. Searles, Proc. IEEE 92, 1043 (2004).
  8. L. A. Rosocha, J. A. Hanlon, J. McLeod, M. Kang, B. L. Kortegaard, M. D. Burrows, and P. S. Bowling, Fusion Technol. 11, 497 (1987);
  9. J. A. Hanlon and J. McLeod, Fusion Technol. 11, 634 (1987).
  10. Y. Owadano, I. Okuda, Y. Matsumoto, I. Matsushima, E. Takahashi, E. Miura, H. Yashiro, T. Tomie, K. Kuwahra, and M. Shinbo, Fusion Eng. Des. 44, 91 (1999);
  11. I. Okuda, E. Takahashi, I. Matsushima, Y. Matsumoto, H. Yashiro, E. Miura, T. Tomie, Y. Owadano, Fusion Eng. Des. 44, 377 (1999).
  12. J. M. D. Lister, M. J. Shaw, C. J. Hooker, and E. C. Harvey, Opt. Commun. 84, 55 (1991).
  13. X. Yi-Huai, G. Zhi-Xing, T. Xiao-Hui, D. Hui, T. Xiu-Zhang, and S. Yu-Sheng, Proc. SPIE 6279, 62795Z (2007).
  14. V. D. Zvorykin, S. V. Arlantsev, R. V. Gaynutdinov, I. V. Kholin, A. O. Levchenko, N. N. Mogilenetz, A. G. Molchanov, V. F. Oreshkin, M. A. Rogulev, S. I. Sagitov, A. P. Sergeev, P. B. Sergeev, D. B. Stavrovskii, N. N. Ustinovskii, and D. A. Zayarnyi, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 112, 032055 (2008).
  15. M. W. McGeoch, P. A. Corcoran, R. G. Altes, I. D. Smith, S. E. Bodner, R. H. Lehmberg, S. P. Obenschain, and J. D. Sethian, Fusion Technol. 32, 610 (1997).
  16. F. Kannari, M. Obara, and T. Fujioka, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 4309 (1985).
  17. S. P. Obenschain, D. G. Colombant, A. J. Schmitt, J. D. Sethian, and M. W. McGeoch, Phys. Plasmas 13, 056320 (2005).
  18. S. P. Obenschain, J. D. Sethian, and A. J. Schmitt, Fusion Sci. Technol. 56, 594 (2009).
  19. C. J. Pawley, K. Gerber, R. H. Lehmberg, E. A. McLean, A. N. Mostovych, S. P. Obenschain, J. D. Sethian, V. Serlin, J. A. Stamper, C. A. Sullivan, S. E. Bodner, D. Colombant, J. P. Dahlburg, A. J. Schmitt, J. H. Gardner, C. Brown, J. F. Seely, T. Lehecka, Y. Aglitskiy, A. V. Deniz, Y. Chan, N. Metzler, and M. Klapisch, Phys. Plasmas 4, 1969 (1997).
  20. A. V. Deniz, T. Lehecka, R. H. Lehmberg, and S. P. Obenschain, Opt. Commun. 147, 402 (1998).
  21. M. Karasik, A. N. Mostovych, R. H. Lehmberg, Y. Chan, J. L. Weaver, and S. P. Obenschain, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 053101 (2005).
  22. R. H. Lehmberg and J. Goldhar, Fusion Technol. 11, 532 (1987);
  23. R. H. Lehmberg, A. J. Schmitt, and S. E. Bodner, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2680 (1987).
  24. R. H. Lehmberg and J. L. Giuliani, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 31 (2003).
  25. G. Petrov, J. L. Giuliani, and A. Dasgupta, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 2662 (2002);
  26. J. L. Giuliani, G. Petrov, and A. Dasgupta, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 1200 (2002).
  27. E. E. Lewis and W. F. Miller, Computational Methods of Neutron Transport (Wiley, New York, 1984).
  28. A. Suda, H. Kumagai, and M. Obara, Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 218 (1987).
  29. M. F. Wolford, F. Hegeler, M. C. Myers, J. L. Giuliani, and J. D. Sethian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 326 (2004).
  30. A. J. Schmitt, Fusion Sci. Technol. 56, 377 (2009).
  31. R. L. Sutherland, Handbook of Nonlinear Optics (Dekker, New York, 1966).
  32. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 2nd ed. (Academic, Amsterdam, 2003).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.