Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Thermal stability of irradiation-induced point defects in cubic silicon carbide
This work aims specifically at studying the evolution of point defects induced by electron irradiation in the cubic polytype of SiC (3C-SiC) at temperatures ranging from 10 to 1450 K by means of photo...
Next Article
X-ray diffraction study of aluminum carbide powder to 50 GPa
The crystal structure and equation of state (EOS) of aluminum carbide (Al4C3) have been determined directly up to 50.1 GPa at room temperature by the synchrotron x-ray diffraction techniques. The resu...

Dislocation-interaction-based model of strained-layer relaxation

J. Appl. Phys. 106, 083510 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3243285

Published 22 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Klaus W. Schwarz and Yuhai Tu
IBM Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA
A strained layer relaxes plastically when dislocations propagate within the layer, leaving behind an array of misfit dislocations at the layer interface. We develop an analytical model of this process, based on the idea that relaxation is frustrated when propagating dislocations are trapped or annihilated by encounters with previously created misfit dislocations or other propagating dislocations. The theory characterizes the evolving density of the misfit array and the density of propagating dislocations in terms of a pair of coupled rate equations. The two trapping functions which appear in these equations are evaluated quantitatively by numerically investigating all possible dislocation-dislocation encounters. Fluctuations in the local stress field driving the individual dislocations are explicitly taken into account when evaluating the trapping functions. Analysis of the rate equations shows that there are two regimes in the strain-relaxation dynamics. Initially, the strain decreases rapidly following a universal dependence on time scaled with the initial dislocation density n0. At a (rescaled) crossover time that increases with n0, the strain levels off from the universal relaxation curve and saturates to an asymptotic residual strain level, which decreases with n0. Microscopically, our model reveals that the initial fast strain-relaxation regime is dominated by collisions between propagating dislocations, while the slow saturation regime is dominated by the trapping of propagating dislocations by the misfits. In the end, the self-trapping of the propagating dislocations by the misfit array they themselves have generated leaves the layer in a frustrated state with residual strain higher than the critical strain. The predictions of the theory are found to be in good agreement with experimental measurements and with large-scale numerical simulations of layer relaxation. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 26 May 2009; accepted 8 September 2009; published 22 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/083510/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (599 kB) View Cart

EPAPS

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 61.72.Bb
    Theories and models of crystal defects
  • 61.72.Hh
    Indirect evidence of dislocations and other defects
  • 81.40.Lm
    Deformation, plasticity, and creep
  • 62.20.fq
    Plasticity and superplasticity of solids
  • 68.60.Bs
    Mechanical and acoustical properties of thin films
  • 68.35.Gy
    Mechanical properties and surface strains of solid surfaces and interfaces
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (32)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. U. K. Mishra and J. Singh, Semiconductor Physics and Design (Springer, New York, 2007).
  2. L. B. Freund and S. Suresh, Thin Film Materials (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
  3. M. Willander and S. C. Jain, Silicon-Germanium Strained Layers and Heterostructures, Semiconductors and Semimetals Vol. 74 (Academic, New York, 2003).
  4. F. C. Frank and J. H. van der Merwe, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 198, 205 (1949).
  5. J. W. Matthews and A. E. Blakeslee, J. Cryst. Growth 27, 118 (1974).
  6. L. B. Freund, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2073 (1990).
  7. V. T. Gillard, W. D. Nix, and L. B. Freund, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7280 (1994).
  8. K. W. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 145503 (2003).
  9. E. A. Stach, K. W. Schwarz, R. Hull, F. M. Ross, and R. M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 947 (2000).
  10. J. Y. Tsao, B. W. Dodson, S. T. Picraux, and D. M. Cornelison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2455 (1987).
  11. J. Y. Tsao and B. W. Dodson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 53, 848 (1988).
  12. T. J. Gosling, S. C. Jain, and A. H. Harker, Phys. Status Solidi A 146, 713 (1994).
  13. J. P. Hirth and J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations (Wiley, New York, 1982).
  14. The symbols f,fa,flt, etc., are defined to represent the absolute values of the forces acting on the threading arm. Since the other dislocations are generated in the process of relaxing the layer, fm must act to oppose fa.
  15. L. B. Freund, J. Appl. Mech. 54, 553 (1987).
  16. X. Feng and J. P. Hirth, J. Appl. Phys. 72, 1386 (1992).
  17. All calculations reported here were carried out using values appropriate for silicon, i.e., µ=6.77×1010  Pa, nu=0.218, and unit-cell size=5.433×10−9  nm, for a layer with h=100  nm. With these values, flt=1.301×10−8  N.
  18. We analyze the case of a layer already containing a known population of dislocations. Many experiments correspond to a more complicated scenario, in which dislocations are nucleated as part of the relaxation process. Our approach can be expanded to include nucleation, when a satisfactory model becomes available.
  19. The effective width for a particular interaction can be defined by fixing the target thread and determining the range of impact parameters for the incident thread which will lead to a thread-thread interaction.
  20. See EPAPS supplementary material at E-JAPIAU-106-020920 for the discussion of how the individual dislocation-dislocation interactions were calculated. [EPAPS]
  21. F. K. LeGoues, MRS Bull. 21, 38 (1996).
  22. R. Hull and E. Stach, in Thin Films: Heteroepitaxial Systems, edited by W. K. Liu and M. B. Santos (World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1999), p. 299.
  23. M. Luysberg, D. Kirch, H. Trinkaus, B. Holländer, St. Lenk, S. Mantl, H.-J. Herzog, T. Hackbarth, and P. F. P. Fichtner, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 4290 (2002).
  24. S. H. Christiansen, P. M. Mooney, J. O. Chu, and A. Grill, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 686, 27 (2002).
  25. J. Cai, P. M. Mooney, S. H. Christiansen, H. Chen, J. O. Chu, and J. A. Ott, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 5347 (2004).
  26. K. W. Schwarz, J. Cai, and P. M. Mooney, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2238 (2004).
  27. K. W. Schwarz, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 108 (1999);
  28. 85, 120 (1999).
  29. K. W. Schwarz, Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 11, 609 (2003).
  30. K. W. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. B 38, 2398 (1988).
  31. K. W. Schwarz and J. R. Rozen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 7563 (1991).
  32. S. D. Gavazza and D. M. Barnett, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 24, 171 (1976).
  33. J. Lothe, in Elastic Strain Fields and Dislocation Mobility, edited by V. L. Indenbohm and J. Lothe (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992), p. 175.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.