Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Equation of state for aluminum containing helium bubbles
A theoretical model for equation of state (EOS) of aluminum with helium bubbles is presented. Based on this EOS, the influence of helium bubbles on shock loading is examined. The Hugoniot curve (tempe...
Next Article
Optical properties in complex-structured nanometric quantum wells: Photoluminescence, photoluminescence excitation, and Stokes shift
Systems in which one or more directions are in the nanometric space scale exhibit significantly some peculiar phenomena and processes. We consider here the case of nanometric quantum wells with comple...

Multiscale modeling of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide

J. Appl. Phys. 106, 083520 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3240344

Published 27 October 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Jean-Paul Crocombette1 and Lionel Gelebart2
1CEA-Saclay, DEN/DMN/SRMP, 91991 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
2CEA-Saclay, DEN/DMN/SRMA , 91991 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France

A multiscale modeling, involving molecular dynamics and finite element calculations, of the degradation of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide due to the thermal (Kapitza) resistances of grain boundaries is presented. Molecular dynamics simulations focus on the <111> family of tilt grain boundaries in cubic SiC. For large tilt angles a simple symmetry and shift procedure is used to generate the grain boundaries while for small angles the boundary structure is obtained by inserting arrays of edge dislocations. The energy and thermal resistances of the grain boundaries are presented. The latter are fed into a finite element homogenization procedure, which enables to calculate the effective thermal conductivity of the SiC polycrystal as a function of its average grain size. The decrease in the thermal conductivity of a polycrystal as a function of its grain size is qualitatively reproduced. However, available experimental values of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline SiC tend to indicate that the present Kapitza resistances cannot be directly used for prediction of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide. We suggest possible explanations for this discrepancy, which seems rather common to Kapitza resistances calculated with molecular dynamics simulations. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 22 July 2009; accepted 6 September 2009; published 27 October 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/083520/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (552 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 66.70.Df
    Nonelectronic thermal conduction and heat-pulse propagation in metals, alloys and semiconductors
  • 61.72.Mm
    Grain and twin boundaries
  • 61.72.Lk
    Linear defects: dislocations, disclinations
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (26)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. P. L. Kapitza, J. Phys. (USSR) 4, 181 (1941).
  2. E. T. Swartz and R. O. Pohl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 605 (1989).
  3. D. Helary, O. Dugne, and X. Bourrat, J. Nucl. Mater. 373, 150 (2008).
  4. J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6991 (1988).
  5. D. Brenner, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9458 (1990).
  6. J. Li, L. Porter, and S. Yip, J. Nucl. Mater. 255, 139 (1998).
  7. J. P. Crocombette, F. Gao, and W. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 023527 (2007).
  8. E. Clouet, L. Ventelon, and F. Willaime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 055502 (2009).
  9. C. Kohler, Phys. Status Solidi B 234, 522 (2002).
  10. S. Aubry, C. J. Kimmer, A. Skye, and P. K. Schelling, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064112 (2008).
  11. L. Porter, J. Li, and S. Yip, J. Nucl. Mater. 246, 53 (1997).
  12. P. K. Schelling, S. R. Phillpot, and P. Keblinski, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6082 (2004).
  13. A. Maiti, G. Mahan, and S. T. Pantelides, Solid State Commun. 102, 517 (1997).
  14. T. Watanabe, B. Ni, S. Phillpot, P. Schelling, and P. Keblinski, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 063503 (2007).
  15. M. Angadi, T. Watanabe, A. Bodapati, X. Xiao, O. Auciello, J. Carlisle, J. Eastman, P. Keblinski, P. Schelling, and S. Philpot, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 114301 (2006).
  16. P. Shukla, T. Watanabe, J. C. Nino, J. S. Tulenko, and S. R. Phillpot, J. Nucl. Mater. 380, 1 (2008).
  17. H. S. Yang, G. R. Bai, L. J. Thompson, and J. A. Eastman, Acta Mater. 50, 2309 (2002).
  18. O. Diard, S. Leclereq, G. Rousselier, and G. Cailletaud, Int. J. Plast. 21, 691 (2005).
  19. M. Ostoja-Starzewski, Probab. Eng. Mech. 21, 112 (2006).
  20. T. Kanit, F. N'Guyen, S. Forest, D. Jeulin, M. Reed, and S. Singleton, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195, 3960 (2006).
  21. C. -W. Nan and R. Birringer, Phys. Rev. B 57, 8264 (1998).
  22. A. K. Collin, M. A. Pickering, and R. L. Taylor, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6510 (1990).
  23. D. S. Smith, S. Fayette, S. Grandjean, C. Martin, R. Telle, and T. Tonnessen, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 105 (2003).
  24. M. Gasch, S. Johnson, and J. Marschall, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1423 (2008).
  25. R. W. Rice, in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by R. K. MacCrone (Academic, New York, 1977), p. 199.
  26. P. C. Millett, D. Wolf, T. Desai, S. Rokkam, and A. El-Azab, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033512 (2008).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.