Multiscale modeling of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide
J. Appl. Phys. 106, 083520 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3240344
Published 27 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A multiscale modeling, involving molecular dynamics and finite element calculations, of the degradation of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide due to the thermal (Kapitza) resistances of grain boundaries is presented. Molecular dynamics simulations focus on the
111
family of tilt grain boundaries in cubic SiC. For large tilt angles a simple symmetry and shift procedure is used to generate the grain boundaries while for small angles the boundary structure is obtained by inserting arrays of edge dislocations. The energy and thermal resistances of the grain boundaries are presented. The latter are fed into a finite element homogenization procedure, which enables to calculate the effective thermal conductivity of the SiC polycrystal as a function of its average grain size. The decrease in the thermal conductivity of a polycrystal as a function of its grain size is qualitatively reproduced. However, available experimental values of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline SiC tend to indicate that the present Kapitza resistances cannot be directly used for prediction of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide. We suggest possible explanations for this discrepancy, which seems rather common to Kapitza resistances calculated with molecular dynamics simulations.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
111
family of tilt grain boundaries in cubic SiC. For large tilt angles a simple symmetry and shift procedure is used to generate the grain boundaries while for small angles the boundary structure is obtained by inserting arrays of edge dislocations. The energy and thermal resistances of the grain boundaries are presented. The latter are fed into a finite element homogenization procedure, which enables to calculate the effective thermal conductivity of the SiC polycrystal as a function of its average grain size. The decrease in the thermal conductivity of a polycrystal as a function of its grain size is qualitatively reproduced. However, available experimental values of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline SiC tend to indicate that the present Kapitza resistances cannot be directly used for prediction of the thermal conductivity of polycrystalline silicon carbide. We suggest possible explanations for this discrepancy, which seems rather common to Kapitza resistances calculated with molecular dynamics simulations.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 22 July 2009; accepted 6 September 2009; published 27 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/083520/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (26)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- P. L. Kapitza, J. Phys. (USSR) 4, 181 (1941).
- E. T. Swartz and R. O. Pohl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 605 (1989).
- D. Helary, O. Dugne, and X. Bourrat,
J. Nucl. Mater. 373, 150 (2008) . - J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. B 37, 6991 (1988).
- D. Brenner, Phys. Rev. B 42, 9458 (1990).
- J. Li, L. Porter, and S. Yip,
J. Nucl. Mater. 255, 139 (1998) . - J. P. Crocombette, F. Gao, and W. J. Weber, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 023527 (2007).
- E. Clouet, L. Ventelon, and F. Willaime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 055502 (2009).
- C. Kohler,
Phys. Status Solidi B 234, 522 (2002) . - S. Aubry, C. J. Kimmer, A. Skye, and P. K. Schelling, Phys. Rev. B 78, 064112 (2008).
- L. Porter, J. Li, and S. Yip,
J. Nucl. Mater. 246, 53 (1997) . - P. K. Schelling, S. R. Phillpot, and P. Keblinski, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6082 (2004).
- A. Maiti, G. Mahan, and S. T. Pantelides,
Solid State Commun. 102, 517 (1997) . - T. Watanabe, B. Ni, S. Phillpot, P. Schelling, and P. Keblinski, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 063503 (2007).
- M. Angadi, T. Watanabe, A. Bodapati, X. Xiao, O. Auciello, J. Carlisle, J. Eastman, P. Keblinski, P. Schelling, and S. Philpot, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 114301 (2006).
- P. Shukla, T. Watanabe, J. C. Nino, J. S. Tulenko, and S. R. Phillpot,
J. Nucl. Mater. 380, 1 (2008) . - H. S. Yang, G. R. Bai, L. J. Thompson, and J. A. Eastman,
Acta Mater. 50, 2309 (2002) . - O. Diard, S. Leclereq, G. Rousselier, and G. Cailletaud,
Int. J. Plast. 21, 691 (2005) . - M. Ostoja-Starzewski,
Probab. Eng. Mech. 21, 112 (2006) . - T. Kanit, F. N'Guyen, S. Forest, D. Jeulin, M. Reed, and S. Singleton,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195, 3960 (2006) . - C. -W. Nan and R. Birringer, Phys. Rev. B 57, 8264 (1998).
- A. K. Collin, M. A. Pickering, and R. L. Taylor, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6510 (1990).
- D. S. Smith, S. Fayette, S. Grandjean, C. Martin, R. Telle, and T. Tonnessen,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 105 (2003) . - M. Gasch, S. Johnson, and J. Marschall,
J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 1423 (2008) . - R. W. Rice, in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by R. K. MacCrone (Academic, New York, 1977), p. 199.
- P. C. Millett, D. Wolf, T. Desai, S. Rokkam, and A. El-Azab, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033512 (2008).







