Surface effect on domain wall width in ferroelectrics
J. Appl. Phys. 106, 084102 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3236644
Published 26 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
We study the effect of the depolarization field on a domain wall structure near the surface of a ferroelectric. Since in real situation bound and screening charges form an electric double layer, the breaking of this layer by the domain wall induces stray depolarization field, which in turn changes the domain wall structure. Power law decay of the stray field results in the power law of polarization saturation near the surface, as compared to exponential saturation in the bulk. Obtained results predict that the surface broadening of ferroelectric domain walls appeared near Curie temperature as well as describe domain wall depth profile in weak ferroelectrics. We qualitatively describe extra-broad domain walls near LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 surfaces observed experimentally at room temperature, which probably originate at high temperatures but did not fully relax their width with temperature decrease allowing for lattice pinning and defect centers. Thus results have broad implication for fundamental issues such as maximal information storage density in ferroelectric data storage, domain wall pinning mechanisms at surfaces and interfaces, and nucleation dynamics.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 19 July 2009; accepted 27 August 2009; published 26 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/084102/1 |
EPAPS
- Supplement_IIrev_v2.doc (1054 kB) 26-Oct-2009 13:18
KEYWORDS and PACS
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (21)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- R. Kretschmer and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 20, 1065 (1979).
- E. V. Chensky and V. V. Tarasenko,
Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 83, 1089 (1982)
[ - J. Junquera and Ph. Ghosez,
Nature (London) 422, 506 (2003) . - W. Cao and L. E. Cross, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5 (1991).
- V. A. Zhirnov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 35, 1175 (1959)
- A. M. Bratkovsky and A. P. Levanyuk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3177 (2000).
- N. A. Pertsev and H. Kohlstedt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 257603 (2007).
- G. Catalan, J. F. Scott, A. Schilling, and J. M. Gregg,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 022201 (2007) . - B. M. Darinskii, A. P. Lazarev, and A. S. Sidorkin, Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 31, 287 (1989)
- S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity: Theoretical Physics (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1976), Vol. 7.
- M. D. Glinchuk, E. A. Eliseev, V. A. Stephanovich, and R. Farhi, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1150 (2003).
- C. -L. Jia, V. Nagarajan, J. -Q. He, L. Houben, T. Zhao, R. Ramesh, K. Urban, and R. Waser,
Nature Mater. 6, 64 (2007) . - M. D. Glinchuk, E. A. Eliseev, A. Deineka, L. Jastrabik, G. Suchaneck, T. Sandner, G. Gerlach, and M. Hrabovsky,
Integr. Ferroelectr. 38, 101 (2001) . - C. H. Woo and Y. Zheng,
Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 91, 59 (2008) . - See EPAPS supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3236644 for the details of electric, elastic fields, and polarization distribution calculation. [EPAPS]
- Y. Daimon and Y. Cho,
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 45, L1304 (2006) . - Y. Daimon and Y. Cho, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 192906 (2007).
- Y. Cho and R. Hirose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 186101 (2007).
- The result is evident from the symmetry considerations.
- Y. L. Li, S. Y. Hu, Z. K. Liu, and L. -Q. Chen,
Acta Mater. 50, 395 (2002) .







