Polarization direction and stability in ferroelectric lead titanate thin films
J. Appl. Phys. 106, 084104 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3240331
Published 26 October 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
In this article, we examine the initial polarization of PbTiO3 thin films grown epitaxially on SrRuO3 electrodes. It is found that the as-grown predominant polarization is directed toward the SrRuO3 bottom electrode in films thinner than 20 nm and directed toward the top surface in thicker films. The data is interpreted in terms of a Landau–Ginzburg–Devonshire model for a semiconducting ferroelectric with asymmetric boundary conditions. Based on the measured hysteresis loops and the stability of the two polarization directions with time, it is concluded that charged defects serve to impose a preferential downward polarization in very thin films.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 3 July 2009; accepted 6 September 2009; published 26 October 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/084104/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
dielectric hysteresis,
dielectric polarisation,
electrodes,
epitaxial growth,
ferroelectric switching,
ferroelectric thin films,
lead compounds,
semiconductor materials
- 77.22.Ej
Dielectric polarization and depolarization - 77.80.Dj
Ferroelectric domain structure; hysteresis - 77.80.Fm
Ferroelectric switching phenomena - 68.55.aj
Insulator thin film nucleation and growth - 77.84.Dy
Dielectric, piezoelectric, and ferroelectric niobates, titanates, tantalates, PZT ceramics, etc - 77.55.+f
Dielectric thin films - YEAR: 2009
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (34)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- I. I. Ivanchik, Sov. Phys. Solid State 3, 2705 (1962).
- G. M. Guro, I. I. Ivanchik, and N. F. Kovtonyuk, Sov. Phys. Solid State 11, 1574 (1970).
- E. V. Chenskii, Sov. Phys. Solid State 12, 446 (1970).
- C. Lichtensteiger, J. -M. Triscone, J. Junquera, and P. Ghosez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 047603 (2005).
- D. D. Fong, A. M. Kolpak, J. A. Eastman, S. K. Streiffer, P. H. Fuoss, G. B. Stephenson, C. Thompson, D. M. Kim, K. J. Choi, C. B. Eom, I. Grinberg, and A. M. Rappe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 127601 (2006).
- C. Thompson, C. M. Foster, J. A. Eastman, and G. B. Stephenson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3516 (1997).
- S. K. Streiffer, J. A. Eastman, D. D. Fong, C. Thompson, A. Munkholm, M. V. Ramana Murty, O. Auciello, G. R. Bai, and G. B. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067601 (2002).
- R. Takahashi, J. K. Grepstad, T. Tybell, and Y. Matsumoto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 112901 (2008).
- S. H. Ahn, W. W. Jung, and S. K. Choi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 172901 (2005).
- C. Lichtensteiger, M. Dawber, N. Stucki, J. -M. Triscone, J. Hoffman, J. -B. Yau, C. H. Ahn, L. Despont, and P. Aebi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 052907 (2007).
- R. V. Wang, D. D. Fong, F. Jiang, M. J. Highland, P. H. Fuoss, C. Thompson, A. M. Kolpak, J. A. Eastman, S. K. Streiffer, A. M. Rappe, and G. B. Stephenson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 047601 (2009).
- Y. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. B 57, 789 (1998).
- Ø. Dahl, J. K. Grepstad, and T. Tybell, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 114112 (2008).
- A. G. Chynoweth, J. Appl. Phys. 27, 78 (1956).
- V. A. Zhirnov,
Sov. Phys. JETP 8, 822 (1959) . - N. A. Pertsev, A. G. Zembilgotov, and A. K. Tagantsev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1988 (1998).
- M. J. Haun, E. Furman, S. J. Jang, H. A. McKinstry, and L. E. Cross, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 3331 (1987).
- The calculations were performed assuming a temperature-independent strain, u11=u22=u=−0.015, with rescaled values for the thermodynamic constants according to Ref. 16, A=A0−u2Q12/s11+s12 and B=B0+Q
/s11+s12. The zero stress values were taken from Ref. 17: A0=
(T−T0) with
=7.530×105 m/F K and T0=478.8 °C, B0=−2.901×108 m5/C2 F, C=1.5636×109 m9/C4 F, Q11=8.9×10−2 m4/C2, Q12=−2.6×10−2 m4/C2, and K was estimated at 9.221×10−11 m3/F. s11=7.2×10−12 m3/C2 F and s12=−2.1×10−12 m3/C2 F were taken from Ref. 27. - N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Harcourt College Publishers, Fort Worth, 1976).
- The intrinsic equilibrium carrier density was estimated assuming a band gap of 3.4 eV and effective electron and hole masses of 10me.
- W. B. Joyce and R. W. Dixon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 354 (1977).
- For a parabolic band, the first four terms are A1
3.53553×10−1, A2
−4.95009×10−3, A3
1.48386×10−4, and A4
−4.42563×10−6. With these four terms, the expansion is accurate up to 
7 (Ref. 21). - The screening length was set at 0.11 nm and the relative dielectric constant at 8.45 (Ref. 34).
- S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981).
- A. J. Hartmann, M. Neilson, R. N. Lamb, K. Watanabe, and J. F. Scott,
Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 70, 239 (2000) . - J. Robertson and C. W. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1168 (1999).
- V. G. Gavrilyachenko and E. G. Fesenko,
Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 16, 549 (1971) . - B. E. Deal, M. Sklar, A. S. Grove, and E. H. Snow,
J. Electrochem. Soc. 114, 266 (1967) . - R. R. Mehta, B. D. Silverman, and J. T. Jacobs, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 3379 (1973).
- G. Arlt and H. Neumann,
Ferroelectrics 87, 109 (1988) . - G. E. Pike, W. L. Warren, D. Dimos, B. A. Tuttle, R. Ramesh, J. Lee, V. G. Keramidas, and J. T. Evans, Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 484 (1995).
- M. Grossmann, O. Lohse, D. Bolten, U. Boettger, T. Schneller, and R. Waser, J. Appl. Phys. 92, 2680 (2002).
- A. K. Tagantsev, I. Stolichnov, N. Setter, and J. S. Cross, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 6616 (2004).
- D. J. Kim, J. Y. Jo, Y. S. Kim, Y. J. Chang, J. S. Lee, J. -G. Yoon, T. K. Song, and T. W. Noh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 237602 (2005).







