Journal of Applied Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Anomalous Hall effect measurement of novel magnetic multilayers
We have used the method of anomalous Hall effect (AHE) to characterize magnetic thin film structures consisting of both perpendicular (normal-to-plane) and longitudinal (in-plane) anisotropies. AHE en...
Next Article
The combined influence of connectivity and disorder on Jc and Tc performances in MgxB2+10  wt %  SiC
The influences of connectivity and disorder on the critical current density Jc are discussed to clarify the different mechanisms of Jc(H) enhancement in different magnetic field ranges. Excess Mg in M...

Electronic structure of acceptor defects in (Zn,Mn)O and (Zn,Mn)(O,N)

J. Appl. Phys. 106, 093905 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3248301

Published 5 November 2009

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

O. Mounkachi,1,5 A. Benyoussef,1,3,4 A. El Kenz,1 E. H. Saidi,2,3,4 and E. K. Hlil5
1Département de Physique, Laboratoire de Magnétisme et de Physique des Hautes Energies, B.P. 1014, Faculté des Sciences, University Mohammed V, Rabat 10000, Morocco
2Département de Physique, Laboratoire de Physique des Hautes Energies, University Mohammed V, B.P. 1014, Faculté des Sciences, Rabat 10000, Morocco
3The Institute of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, INANOTECH, Rabat 10000, Morocco
4Hassan II Academy of Sciences and Technology, Rabat 10000, Morocco
5Institut Néel, CNRS-UJF, B.P. 166, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France

Using first-principles density functional calculations, we study the electronic structure and magnetic properties of Mn-doped ZnO, wurtzite crystal structure, with various defects. This allows to understand and to explain the half-metallicity and the ferromagnetism stability, observed in Mn-doped ZnO with acceptor defects like Zn vacancies. The calculations were performed using the Korringa–Kohn–Rostoker method combined with the coherent potential approximation. Hydrogenation effects in (Zn,Mn)O and (Zn,Mn)(O,N) is also investigated with and without defects. This work presents detailed information about total, atom, and vacancy projected density of states functions, and magnetic moment for different atoms and defects in Mn-doped ZnO and N-codoped (Zn,Mn)O. The Curie temperature TC is evaluated by using the mean field approximation. We show also that higher values of TC are attained for high concentration of vacancy defects sites in (Zn,Mn)O and for small concentration of vacancy defects sites in (Zn,Mn)(O,N). Mechanism of exchange interaction between magnetic ions in Mn-doped ZnO and N-codoped (Zn,Mn)O with and without defects is also investigated. Finally, we propose a model which describes the origin of strong ferromagnetism stability observed in p-type ZnO. ©2009 American Institute of Physics
History: Received 2 February 2009; accepted 20 September 2009; published 5 November 2009
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/093905/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (423 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 71.55.Gs
    Impurity and defect levels in II-VI semiconductors
  • 75.50.Pp
    Magnetic semiconductors
  • 75.30.Cr
    Saturation moments and magnetic susceptibilities in magnetically ordered materials
  • 75.30.Et
    Exchange and superexchange interactions in magnetically ordered materials
  • 75.50.Dd
    Nonmetallic ferromagnetic materials
  • 71.20.Nr
    Electronic structure of crystalline semiconductor compounds
  • YEAR: 2009

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-8979 (print)   1089-7550 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (17)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. K. Sato and H. Katayama-Yoshida, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17, 367 (2002).
  2. P. Sharma, A. Gupta, K. V. Rao, F. J. Owens, R. Sharma, R. Ahuja, J. M. O. Guillen, B. Johansson, and G. A. Gehring, Nature Mater. 2, 673 (2003).
  3. A. S. Risbud, N. A. Spaldin, Z. Q. Chen, S. Stemmer, and R. Seshadri, Phys. Rev. B 68, 205202 (2003).
  4. A. Tiwari, C. Jin, A. Kvit, D. Kumar, J. F. Muth, and J. Narayan, Solid State Commun. 121, 371 (2002).
  5. T. Dietl, H. Ohno, F. Matsukura, J. Cibert, and D. Ferrand, Science 287, 1019 (2000).
  6. Q. Xu, H. Schmidt, S. Zhou, K. Potzger, M. Helm, H. Hochmuth, M. Lorenz, A. Setzer, P. Esquinazi, C. Meinecke, and M. Grundmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 082508 (2008).
  7. D. Iusan, B. Sanyal, and O. Eriksson, Phys. Rev. B 74, 235208 (2006).
  8. O. Mounkachi, A. Benyoussef, A. El Kenz, E. H. Saidi, and E. K. Hlil, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 2760 (2008).
  9. O. Mounkachi, A. Benyoussef, A. El Kenz, and E. H. Saidi, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 2402 (2009).
  10. T. Fukumura, Z. Jin, A. Ohtomo, H. Koinuma, and M. Kawasaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 958 (2001).
  11. T. Fukumura, Z. Jin, A. Ohtomo, H. Koinuma, and M. Kawasaki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 3366 (1999).
  12. P. Gopal and N. A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. B 74, 094418 (2006).
  13. H. Akai, MACHIKANEYAMA2002V08, Departement of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama 1–1,Toyonaka 560–0043, Japan, akai@phys.sci.osaka-u.ac.jp.
  14. S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980).
  15. H. Ebert, J. Minar, and V. Popescu, The Munich SPR–KKR package, http://olymp.cup.uni-muenchen.de/ak/ebert/SPRKKR.
  16. L. Petit, T. C. Schulthess, A. Svane, Z. Szotek, W. M. Temmerman, and A. Janotti, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045107 (2006).
  17. K. Sato and H. Katayama-Yoshida, Physica E (Amsterdam) 10, 251 (2001).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.