Spectrally narrowed edge emission from leaky waveguide modes in organic light-emitting diodes
J. Appl. Phys. 106, 094502 (2009); doi:10.1063/1.3253582
Published 3 November 2009
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
A dramatic spectral line narrowing of the edge emission at room temperature from tris(quinolinolate) Al (Alq3), N,N
-diphenyl-N,N
-bis(1-naphthylphenyl)-1,1
-biphenyl-4,4
-diamine (NPD), 4,4
-bis(2,2
-diphenyl-vinyl)-,1
-biphenyl (DPVBi), and some guest-host small molecular organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), fabricated on indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass, is described. In all but the DPVBi OLEDs, the narrowed emission band emerges above a threshold thickness of the emitting layer, and narrows down to a full width at half maximum of only 5–10 nm. The results demonstrate that this narrowed emission is due to irregular waveguide modes that leak from the ITO to the glass substrate at a grazing angle. While measurements of variable stripe length l devices exhibit an apparent weak optical gain 0
g
1.86 cm−1, there is no observable threshold current or bias associated with this spectral narrowing. In addition, in the phosphorescent guest-host OLEDs, there is no decrease in the emission decay time of the narrowed edge emission relative to the broad surface emission. It is suspected that the apparent weak optical gain is due to misalignment of the axis of the waveguided mode and the axis of the collection lens of the probe. However, it is not clear if such a misalignment can account for all the effects of the observed evolution of the edge-emission spectra with l.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
-diphenyl-N,N
-bis(1-naphthylphenyl)-1,1
-biphenyl-4,4
-diamine (NPD), 4,4
-bis(2,2
-diphenyl-vinyl)-,1
-biphenyl (DPVBi), and some guest-host small molecular organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), fabricated on indium tin oxide (ITO)-coated glass, is described. In all but the DPVBi OLEDs, the narrowed emission band emerges above a threshold thickness of the emitting layer, and narrows down to a full width at half maximum of only 5–10 nm. The results demonstrate that this narrowed emission is due to irregular waveguide modes that leak from the ITO to the glass substrate at a grazing angle. While measurements of variable stripe length l devices exhibit an apparent weak optical gain 0
g
1.86 cm−1, there is no observable threshold current or bias associated with this spectral narrowing. In addition, in the phosphorescent guest-host OLEDs, there is no decrease in the emission decay time of the narrowed edge emission relative to the broad surface emission. It is suspected that the apparent weak optical gain is due to misalignment of the axis of the waveguided mode and the axis of the collection lens of the probe. However, it is not clear if such a misalignment can account for all the effects of the observed evolution of the edge-emission spectra with l.
©2009 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 2 March 2009; accepted 24 September 2009; published 3 November 2009 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JAPIAU/106/094502/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-8979 (print)
1089-7550 (online)
REFERENCES (27)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- G. Kranzelbinder and G. Leising,
Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 729 (2000) . - V. G. Kozlov, P. E. Burrows, G. Parthasarathy, and S. R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1057 (1999).
- N. Tessler, D. J. Pinner, V. Cleave, D. S. Thomas, G. Yahioglu, and P. Le Barny, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2764 (1999).
- N. Tessler,
Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 11, 363 (1999) . - M. A. Baldo, R. J. Holmes, and S. R. Forrest, Phys. Rev. B 66, 035321 (2002).
- H. Yamamoto, T. Oyamada, H. Sasabe, and C. Adachi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1401 (2004).
- Y. Tian, Z. Gan, Z. Zhou, K. Ji-hun, Q. -H. Park, D. W. Lynch, and J. Shinar, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0701312.
- Y. Tian, Z. Gan, Z. Zhou, D. W. Lynch, J. Shinar, J. -h. Kang, and Q. -H. Park,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 1 (2007) . - K. L. Shaklee and R. F. Leheny, Appl. Phys. Lett. 18, 475 (1971).
- M. D. McGehee, R. Gupta, S. Veenstra, E. K. Miller, M. A. Diaz-Garcia, and A. J. Heeger, Phys. Rev. B 58, 7035 (1998).
- L. Zou, V. Savvate'ev, J. Booher, C. H. Kim, and J. Shinar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2282 (2001).
- K. O. Cheon and J. Shinar, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 1738 (2002).
- G. Li, C. H. Kim, Z. Zhou, J. Shinar, K. Okumoto, and Y. Shirota, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 253505 (2006).
- G. E. Jabbour, B. Kippelen, N. R. Armstrong, and N. Peyghambarian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1185 (1998).
- M. Y. Chan, S. L. Lai, M. K. Fung, C. S. Lee, and S. T. Lee, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 5397 (2004).
- V. Bulovic, V. B. Khalfin, G. Gu, and P. E. Burrows, Phys. Rev. B 58, 3730 (1998).
- M. D. McGehee and A. J. Heeger,
Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 12, 1655 (2000) . - G. M. H. Knippels, A. F. G. van der Meer, D. Oepts, and P. W. van Amersfoort,
IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 33, 10 (1997) . - K. Ogusu, M. Miyagi, and S. Nishida,
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 48 (1980) . - I. Pelant, T. Ostatnicky, J. Valenta, K. Luterova, K. Luterova, E. Skopalova, T. Mates, and R. G. Elliman,
Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt. 83, 87 (2006) . - N. Tessler and R. H. Friend,
Synth. Met. 102, 1122 (1999) . - F. Li, O. Solomesch, P. R. Mackie, D. Cupertino, and N. Tessler, J. Appl. Phys 99, 013101 (2006).
- D. K. Mynbaev and L. L. Scheiner, Fiber-Optic Communications Technology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2001).
- D. Marcuse, Theory of Dielectric Optical Waveguides, 2nd ed. (Academic, New York, 1991).
- L. Negro, P. Bettotti, M. Cazzanelli, D. Pacifici, and L. Pavesi,
Opt. Commun. 229, 337 (2004) . - L. Pavesi, S. Gaponenko, and L. D. Negro, Towards the First Silicon Laser (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003).
- C. Adachi, R. C. Kwong, P. Djurovich, V. Adamovich, M. A. Baldo, M. E. Thompson, and S. R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2082 (2001).







