change style to default Text Only
Previous Article
The structure of vocal sounds produced with the mouth closed or with the mouth open in treefrogs
Frogs and toads mostly call with their mouths shut, unlike many other vertebrates. Sound is generated when air crosses the larynx, but there is no direct airflow to the external environment and radiat...
Next Article
Carrier-dependent temporal processing in an auditory interneuron
Signal processing in the auditory interneuron Omega Neuron 1 (ON1) of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus was compared at high- and low-carrier frequencies in three different experimental paradigms. Fi...

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Human listeners attend to size information in domestic dog growls

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 123, Issue 5, pp. 2903-2909 (May 2008)

Issue Date: May 2008
Buy This PDF   (US$25)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (193 kB) View Cart
Anna M. Taylor, David Reby, and Karen McComb
Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QH United Kingdom
The acoustic features of vocalizations have the potential to transmit information about the size of callers. Most acoustic studies have focused on intraspecific perceptual abilities, but here, the ability of humans to use growls to assess the size of adult domestic dogs was tested. In a first experiment, the formants of growls were shifted to create playback stimuli with different formant dispersions (Deltaf), simulating different vocal tract lengths within the natural range of variation. Mean fundamental frequency (F0) was left unchanged and treated as a covariate. In a second experiment, F0 was resynthesized and Deltaf was left unchanged. In both experiments Deltaf and F0 influenced how participants rated the size of stimuli. Lower formant and fundamental frequencies were rated as belonging to larger dogs. Crucially, when F0 was manipulated and Deltaf was natural, ratings were strongly correlated with the actual weight of the dogs, while when Deltaf was varied and F0 was natural, ratings were not related to the actual weight. Taken together, this suggests that participants relied more heavily on Deltaf, in accordance with the fact that formants are better predictors of body size than F0.

©2008 Acoustical Society of America
History: Received 21 September 2007; revised 29 January 2008; accepted 17 February 2008
Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2896962

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 43.80.Ka
    Sound production by animals
  • 43.80.Lb
    Sound reception by animals
  • 43.71.Bp
    Perception of voice and talker characteristics
  • YEAR: 2008

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0001-4966 (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASA

REFERENCES (43)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.

©  Acoustical Society of America