change style to default Text Only
Previous Article
Does harmonicity explain children's cue weighting of fricative-vowel syllables?
When labeling syllable-initial fricatives, children have been found to weight formant transitions more and fricative-noise spectra less than adults, prompting the suggestion that children attend more ...
Next Article
Temporal integration in vowel perception
Psychoacoustic research suggests that multiple auditory channels process incoming sounds over temporal windows of different durations, resulting in multiple auditory representations being available to...

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Vowel devoicing and the perception of spoken Japanese words

J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Volume 125, Issue 3, pp. 1693-1703 (March 2009)

Issue Date: March 2009
Buy This PDF   (US$25)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (142 kB) View Cart
Anne Cutler
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands and MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South DC NSW 1797, Australia

Takashi Otake
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands and E-Listening Laboratory, Tokorozawa, 359 0021, Japan

James M. McQueen
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands and Radboud University Nijmegen, Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Three experiments, in which Japanese listeners detected Japanese words embedded in nonsense sequences, examined the perceptual consequences of vowel devoicing in that language. Since vowelless sequences disrupt speech segmentation [Norris et al. (1997). Cognit. Psychol. 34, 191–243], devoicing is potentially problematic for perception. Words in initial position in nonsense sequences were detected more easily when followed by a sequence containing a vowel than by a vowelless segment (with or without further context), and vowelless segments that were potential devoicing environments were no easier than those not allowing devoicing. Thus asa, “morning,” was easier in asau or asazu than in all of asap, asapdo, asaf, or asafte, despite the fact that the /f/ in the latter two is a possible realization of fu, with devoiced [u]. Japanese listeners thus do not treat devoicing contexts as if they always contain vowels. Words in final position in nonsense sequences, however, produced a different pattern: here, preceding vowelless contexts allowing devoicing impeded word detection less strongly (so, sake was detected less accurately, but not less rapidly, in nyaksake—possibly arising from nyakusake—than in nyagusake). This is consistent with listeners treating consonant sequences as potential realizations of parts of existing lexical candidates wherever possible.

©2009 Acoustical Society of America
History: Received 6 August 2007; revised 20 November 2008; accepted 14 December 2008
Permalink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3075556

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 43.71.Es
    Vowel and consonant perception; perception of words, sentences, and fluent speech
  • YEAR: 2009

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0001-4966 (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef ASA

REFERENCES (37)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.

©  Acoustical Society of America