Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Next Article
Transferability of Urey-Bradley Force Constants. I. Calculation of Force Constants on a Digital Computer
An algorithm for the systematic calculation of Urey-Bradley force constants has been programed for a digital computer (the Datatron 204). The secular equation is set up and solved in internal coordina...

Interactions between Molecules Adsorbed on a Surface

J. Chem. Phys. 32, 1279 (1960); doi:10.1063/1.1730910

Issue Date: May 1960

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Oktay Sinanoğlu and Kenneth S. Pitzer
Lawrence Radiation Laboratory and College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley 4, California
The intermolecular potential energy between two inert gas molecules is considerably altered when these molecules are next to a solid surface as in physical adsorption. The change in the interaction is evidenced by the additional long-range repulsion that is often observed between the molecules of a monolayer and also by the additional attractions that must play a role in multilayer formation.In this article, the two-molecule-surface potential is derived from quantum mechanical third-order perturbation theory. It is shown that this potential consists of two parts just as the energy giving the van der Waals attraction of a single molecule to a surface does. The first part exists only when the surface has a net electrostatic field and this is equivalent to the classical polarization effect. The second part arises from the fluctuations of the surface fields and is of the same origin as the dispersion forces. The third-order energy, i.e., the new intermolecular interaction caused by the surface, is directly related to the zero-coverage heat of adsorption and except for this experimental quantity, the results do not require specific assumptions about the surface. Thus, the theory is applicable to either metal or insulator surfaces. When both the two-molecule-surface and the one-molecule-surface interactions are available experimentally (for example, from the application of virial coefficients treatment in physical adsorption) the electrostatic field of the surface can be estimated.The fluctuation or dispersion part of the third-order energy is shown to yield a repulsion between two molecules in a monolayer that amounts to 20–40% of the gas phase Lennard-Jones potential minimum epsilon0. The same energy yields an additional attraction of about 10–20% of epsilon0 when the two molecules are on top of one another as in multilayer formation. The theory is applicable also when more than two molecules at a time need be considered on the surface. ©1960 American Institute of Physics
History: Received August 26, 1959
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/32/1279/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (830 kB) View Cart

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (28)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. H. Margenau, Revs. Modern Phys. 11, 1 (1939).
  2. K. S. Pitzer, Advances in Chemical Physics (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1959), Vol. II; or see K. S. Pitzer, UCRL 8395 (September, 1958).
  3. J. H. de Boer, Advances in Catalysis 8, 29 (1956).
  4. S. Brunauer, The Adsorption of Gases and Vapors (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1945), p. 180.
  5. (a) W. A. Steele and G. D. Halsey, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 22, 979 (1954);
  6. see also (b) M. P. Freeman, J. Phys. Chem. 62, 729 (1958).
  7. J. C. P. Mignolet, Rec. trav. chim. 74, 701 (1955).
  8. G. Ehrlich and F. G. Hudda, J. Chem. Phys. 30, 493 (1959).
  9. T. Kihara, Advances in Chemical Physics (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1958), Vol. I, p. 267;
  10. Triple-dipole energy was first discussed by B. M. Axilrod and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 11, 299 (1943);
    Axilrod, ibid. 19, 719 (1951).
  11. M. J. Sparnaay, Physica 25, 217 (1959).
  12. L. Jansen and R. T. McGinnies, Phys. Rev. 104, 961 (1956).
  13. W. L. Bade, J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1280, 1284 (1957);
  14. 28, 282 (1958).
  15. W. G. Pollard, Phys. Rev. 61, 740(A) (1942).
  16. (a) K. Huang and G. Wyllie, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 62, 180 (1949);
  17. (b) J. C. P. Mignolet, in Chemisorption (Butterworths Scientific Publications, Ltd., London, 1957), p. 181.
  18. J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 58, 727 (1940).
  19. E. J. R. Prosen and R. G. Sachs, Phys. Rev. 61, 70 (1942).
  20. H. Margenau and W. G. Pollard, Phys. Rev. 60, 128 (1941).
  21. See for example, Hirschfelder, Curtiss, and Bird, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1954).
  22. T. L. Hill, J. Phys. Chem. 63, 456 (1959).
  23. R. A. Pierotti and G. D. Halsey, Jr., J. Phys. Chem. 63, 680 (1959).
  24. K. S. Pitzer, Quantum Chemistry (Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York, 1954), p. 339.
  25. W. E. Donath, University of California, Ph.D. thesis (1958) and UCRL-8385 (July 21, 1958).
  26. R. S. Mulliken, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 811 (1952).
  27. In general E(3) will have an additional term which is different in different perturbation theories (see: Morse and Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1953), Vol. II; however, this term vanishes in our case because of the dipole selection rules.
  28. Landau and Liftschitz, Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1958).
  29. N. F. Mott and H. Jones, The Theory of the Properties of Metals and Alloys (reprinted by Dover Publishers, Inc., New York, 1936), p. 59.
  30. M. Tinkham, Advanced Quantum Mechanics of Atoms, Molecules, and Solids (A.S.U.C. Store, University of California, Berkeley, 1958), p. 94.
  31. M. P. Freeman, J. Phys. Chem. 62, 723 (1958).
  32. T. L. Hill, Advances in Catalysis 4, 236 (1952);
  33. G. D. Halsey, op. cit., p. 265.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.