Matrix Reactions of K and Rb Atoms with Oxygen Molecules
Deposition of atomic beams of potassium and rubidium with oxygen molecules at high dilution in argon together on a salt window at 15°K produces the KO2 and RbO2 molecules, as identified by infrare...
Deposition of atomic beams of potassium and rubidium with oxygen molecules at high dilution in argon together on a salt window at 15°K produces the KO2 and RbO2 molecules, as identified by infrare...
High Resolution Vacuum Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectra of Transient Species: O2(1
g) and Previously Unobserved States of O
g) and Previously Unobserved States of OInteraction Energy Curves of LiHe and NaHe (X2
+,A2
,B2+) and X1+ Ions
J. Chem. Phys. 54, 4944 (1971); doi:10.1063/1.1674773
Issue Date: 1 June 1971
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Hartree–Fock interaction energy curves have been calculated for the X2+,A2, and B2+ states of neutral LiHe and NaHe as well as for the ground state X1+ ions over a range of distances from 3 to 10 a.u. Since it is intended to apply these results to scattering problems, the variation of the dipole and quadrupole moments and the electronic transition probabilities with internuclear distance were also obtained. Both Slater-type functions and Gaussian-type functions were used as variational trial functions with the intention of gauging the efficacy of the Gaussian basis. Except for situations involving small energy minima the Gaussian basis yielded results accurate relative to the Slater basis. The features of the Hartree–Fock interaction energy curves can be summarized as follows:(1) The X2+ interaction energy is purely repulsive for both molecules to the accuracy of the present calculation.(2) The A2 and X1+ curves are strikingly similar for both Li and Na confirming the penetration of the He for this interatomic orientation.(3) The long-range repulsive behavior of the B2+ curve compared with estimates of the correlation energy shows that the internuclear distance dependence of the energy in the region of 10 a.u. is dominated by the Hartree–Fock repulsive curve.Charge-density plots have been obtained for all states and distances. These are used to illustrate the physical basis of the energy curves.
©1971 American Institute of Physics
+,A2, and B2+ states of neutral LiHe and NaHe as well as for the ground state X1+ ions over a range of distances from 3 to 10 a.u. Since it is intended to apply these results to scattering problems, the variation of the dipole and quadrupole moments and the electronic transition probabilities with internuclear distance were also obtained. Both Slater-type functions and Gaussian-type functions were used as variational trial functions with the intention of gauging the efficacy of the Gaussian basis. Except for situations involving small energy minima the Gaussian basis yielded results accurate relative to the Slater basis. The features of the Hartree–Fock interaction energy curves can be summarized as follows:(1) The X2+ interaction energy is purely repulsive for both molecules to the accuracy of the present calculation.(2) The A2 and X1+ curves are strikingly similar for both Li and Na confirming the penetration of the He for this interatomic orientation.(3) The long-range repulsive behavior of the B2+ curve compared with estimates of the correlation energy shows that the internuclear distance dependence of the energy in the region of 10 a.u. is dominated by the Hartree–Fock repulsive curve.Charge-density plots have been obtained for all states and distances. These are used to illustrate the physical basis of the energy curves.
©1971 American Institute of Physics
| History: | Received 7 December 1970 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/54/4944/1 |
Connotea
CiteULike
del.icio.us
BibSonomy
REFERENCES (25)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- (a) T. L. Gilbert and A. C. Wahl, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 3425 (1967);
- (a) E. E. Nikitin, Commun. At. Mol. Phys. 1, 122 (1969);
- A. Dalgarno and W. D. Davison,
Advan. At. and Mol. Phys. 2, 1 (1966) . - (a) J. Callaway and E. Bauer, Phys. Rev. 140, A1072 (1965);
- S. B. Schneiderman and H. H. Michels, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 3706 (1965).
- S. Ja. Umanski and A. I. Voronin,
Theoret. Chim. Acta 12, 166 (1968) . - W. E. Bayliss, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 2665 (1969).
- The STF calculation used BISON: “A Fortran Computer System for the Calculation of Analytic Self-Consistent-Field Wave Functions, Properties, and Charge Densities for Diatomic Molecules,” by A. C. Wahl, P. J. Bertoncini, K. Kaiser, and R. H. Land, ANL Report. ANL-7271 (1968),
- See Ref. 8 and A. C. Wahl,
Science 151, 961 (1966) . - C. C. J. Roothaan,
Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 179 (1960) ;
C. C. J. Roothaan and P. S. Bagus, Methods Computational Phys. 2, 47 (1963). - T. L. Gilbert and P. S. Bagus, unpublished atom bases which are partially tabulated in Ref. 8.
- S. Huzinaga, J. Chem. Phys. 42, 1293 (1965).
- D. W. Marguardt, IBM Share Library routine 309401, “Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters,” 1966.
- A. Dalgarno and A. E. Kingston,
Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A259, 424 (1960) . - A. Dalgarno, M. R. C. McDowell, and A. Williams,
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Ser. A 250, 411 (1958) . - M. G. Menendez, M. J. Redmon, and J. F. Aebischer,
Phys. Rev. 180, 69 (1969) . - See Ref. 8 for BISON description and A. C. Wahl,
Science 151, 961 (1966) . - H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Handbuch der Physics, Atoms I (Springer, Berlin, 1957), Vol. 35.
- It has been determined by G. Das and A. C. Wahl, Phys. Rev. (to be published) that the dispersion part of the correlation energy for LiHe is well represented by the R−6 and R−8 terms of the usual van der Waals' expansion obtained by perturbation methods.
- G. D. Mahan, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 950 (1968);
- A. D. Buckingham,
Advan. Chem. Phys. 12, 107 (1967) . - R. F. W. Bader, I. Keaveny, and P. E. Cade, J. Chem. Phys. 47, 3381 (1967).
- W. A. Lester, Jr. and M. Krauss, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 4775 (1970).
- R. L. Matcha and R. K. Nesbet, Phys. Rev. 160, 72 (1967).
- H. B. Levine and G. Birnbaum, Phys. Rev. 154, 86 (1967);
(c) B. F. Junker and J. C. Browne, Proc. Intern. Conf. Phys. Electron At. Collisions 6th, 220-1;
(d) C. R. Fischer, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 215 (1968).
The GTF calculation used IBMOL: Version 2, E. Clementi and A. Veillard, IBM Res. Lab. Report (1966).
IBMOL/2 was modified at the National Bureau of Standards for the present open-shell problem. IBMOL description is given by E. Clementi and D. R. Davis, J. Computational Phys. 2, 223 (1967).
D. A. McQuarrie and R. B. Bernstein, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 1958 (1968).
