Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Gas phase EPR linewidths and intermolecular potentials. III. Experimental results for the F–Ar, Cl–He, and Cl–Ar systems
Previous linewidth measurements on the gas phase EPR spectral lines of the F atom perturbed by He have been extended to include the collision pairs, F–Ar, Cl–He, and Cl–Ar. The new r...
Next Article
Mode expansion method in polyelectrolytes
With the use of Andersen and Chandler's collective variable method, the free energy of polyelectrolytes is estimated assuming that the polymer charge distribution is regarded as linearly distributed p...

Order–disorder phenomena in adsorbed layers described by a lattice gas model

J. Chem. Phys. 62, 2957 (1975); doi:10.1063/1.430900

Issue Date: 15 April 1975

You are logged in to this journal.

G. Doyen and G. Ertl
Physikalisch-Chemisches Institut der Universität München, München, West Germany

M. Plancher
Institut für Physikalische Chemie und Elektrochemie, Technische Universität Hannover, Hannover, West Germany
Order–disorder transitions in adsorbed phases on single crystal surfaces manifest themselves by variations of the low energy electron diffraction (LEED) patterns. The present paper contains a theoretical treatment of the statistical properties of the simplest structure within this framework, namely a layer which may be described by a square lattice gas model with repulsive interactions between nearest neighbors and giving rise to a c2×2-LEED pattern on the (100) surface of a fcc or bcc crystal. At a coverage theta=1/2 the relative intensities of the half-order LEED spots are, within the kinematic approximation, shown to be identical to the expectation value of the spin-correlation function of the two-dimensional Ising model, averaged over an area corresponding to the coherence width of the electron beam. For theta<1/2 no analytic solutions are available, but the problem may be treated by means of the Monte Carlo technique, the results of which for theta=1/2 agree quite well with those from the analytic solution. The order–disorder transition temperature is predicted to decrease strongly with decreasing coverage. Below theta=0.25 the distinction between ordered and disordered phases becomes more or less irrelevant, a fact made evident by a crude determination of the configurational entropies. The configurational energy, the specific heat of the adsorbate layer and some parameters characterizing short-range order are evaluated as further quantities. The latter data may be of some importance for the kinetics of ad- and de-sorption. Quantitative comparison with experimental results is so far only possible with the LEED data for the system H/W (100) where the agreement is rather good. In a series of other cases, at least the qualitative features of the present treatment are applicable. The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download PDF (777 kB) View Cart

PACS

  • 82.65.My
    Physical chemistry Surface processes Sorption and accommodation coefficients
  • 63.80.+n
    Lattice dynamics and crystal statistics Cooperative crystal statistics and order-disorder phenomena
  • 68.20.-s
    Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers Structure of surfaces and interfaces
  • YEAR: 1975

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (47)

  1. J. J. Lander, Surf. Sci. 1, 125 (1964). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  2. A. U. MacRae, Surf. Sci. 1, 319 (1964).
  3. J. J. Lander and J. Morrison, Surf. Sci. 6, 1 (1967). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  4. P. J. Estrap, in The Structure and Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, edited by G. A. Somorjai (Wiley, New York 1969), p. 19-1.
  5. A. G. Fedorus and A. G. Nauvomets, Surf. Sci. 21, 426 (1970). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  6. A. G. Fedorus, A. G. Nauvomets, and Yu. S. Vedula, Phys. Stat. Solidi 13a, 445 (1972).
  7. J. C. Tracy, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2736 (1972). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  8. J. L. Domange, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9, 682 (1972). [ISI]
  9. M. Kostelitz, J. L. Domange and J. Oudar, Solid State Commun.
  10. See, for example: (a) C. B. Duke, Adv. Chem. Phys. 27, 1 (1974);
  11. (b) J. B. Pendry, Low Energy Electron Diffraction, (Academic, New York, 1974).
  12. J. E. Houston and R. L. Park, Surf. Sci. 21, 209 (1970); [Inspec]
  13. 26, 269 (1970). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  14. P. J. Estrup and J. Anderson, Surf. Sci. 8, 101 (1967).
  15. G. Ertl and J. Küppers, Surf. Sci. 21, 61 (1970). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  16. R. Heckingbottom, Surf. Sci. 27, 370 (1971). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  17. C. E. Carroll, Surf. Sci. 32, 119 (1972). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  18. G. E. Laramore, J. E. Houston, and R. L. Park, Surface Sci. 34, 477 (1973). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  19. C. B. Duke and A. Liebsch, Phys. Rev. B 9, 1126, 1150 (1974). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  20. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  21. M. E. Fisher, Rept. Progr. Theor. Phys. 30, 615 (1967).
  22. R. L. Park, J. E. Houston, and D. G. Schreiner, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42, 60 (1971). [ISI]
  23. G. Ertl and M. Plancher, Surf. Sci. (in press).
  24. E. Ising, Z. Phys. 31, 253 (1925). [ISI]
  25. See, for example: K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1963), p. 329.
  26. T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 87, 410 (1952).
  27. J. Als-Nielsen and O. W. Dietrich, Phys. Rev. 153, 706 (1967). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  28. C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 85, 808 (1952). [ISI]
  29. E. W. Montroll, R. B. Potts, and J. C. Ward, J. Math. Phys. 4, 308 (1963). [ISI]
  30. T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and E. H. Lieb, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 856 (1964).
  31. R. L. Park, in The Structure and Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, edited by G. A. Somorjai (Wiley, New York, 1969), p. 28-1.
  32. M. Domke, G. Jähnig, and M. Drechsler, Surf. Sci. 42, 389 (1974). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  33. T. L. Einstein and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. B 7, 3629 (1973).
  34. T. B. Grimley and M. Torrini, J. Phys. C 6, 868 (1973). [ISI]
  35. R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 17 (1969).
  36. See, for example: G. Wannier, Statistical Physics (Wiley, New York, 1966).
  37. (a) P. W. Tamm and L. D. Schmidt, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 5352 (1969). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  38. (b) K. Christmann, O. Schober, G. Ertl, and M. Neumann, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 4528 (1974). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  39. D. A. King, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 10, 272 (1973). [ISI]
  40. T. Toya, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 9, 936 (1972). [ISI]
  41. A. E. Ferdinand and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 185, 832 (1969).
  42. D. P. Landau and R. Alben, Am. J. Phys. 41, 394 (1973). [ISI]
  43. E. Stoll, K. Binder, and T. Schneider, Phys. Rev. B 8, 3266 (1973). [Inspec]
  44. C. P. Yang, Appl. Math. 15, 351 (1963).
  45. M. Bretz and J. G. Dash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 647 (1971). [ISI]
  46. J. Hijmans and J. de Boer, Physica 21, 471, 485, 499 (1955).
  47. J. M. Honig, in The Solid-Gas Interface, edited by E. A. Flood (Dekker, New York, 1967), p. 371.
  48. L. Guttman, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 1024 (1961). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  49. J. E. Houston and R. L. Park, Surf. Sci. 21, 209 (1970). [Inspec]
  50. L. Guttman, Solid State Phys. 3, 145 (1956) (ScienceDirect). [ChemPort]