Rotational state distributions of NO molecules after interaction with germanium surfaces
J. Chem. Phys. 83, 4800 (1985); doi:10.1063/1.449006
Issue Date: 1 November 1985
You are logged in to this journal.
The rotational state distributions of NO molecules scattered at clean and oxidized Ge surfaces were determined by means of laser induced fluorescence (LIF). For low incident kinetic energies (Ekin
200 meV) scattering is dominated by trapping/desorption and the molecules coming off the surface are translationally accommodated to the surface temperature. The rotational state populations can in this case be approximated by a Boltzmann distribution. The rotational temperature Trot equals the surface temperature Ts, however only up to about 250 K. Further increase of Ts leads to a leveling off of Trot until a limiting value Trot,lim
400 K is reached. (Rotational cooling in desorption.) At higher kinetic energies direct-inelastic scattering dominates, and for Ekin=820 meV a pronounced non-Boltzmann distribution (rotational rainbow) is observed. The observed effects are qualitatively interpreted in terms of current theoretical models.
The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
200 meV) scattering is dominated by trapping/desorption and the molecules coming off the surface are translationally accommodated to the surface temperature. The rotational state populations can in this case be approximated by a Boltzmann distribution. The rotational temperature Trot equals the surface temperature Ts, however only up to about 250 K. Further increase of Ts leads to a leveling off of Trot until a limiting value Trot,lim
400 K is reached. (Rotational cooling in desorption.) At higher kinetic energies direct-inelastic scattering dominates, and for Ekin=820 meV a pronounced non-Boltzmann distribution (rotational rainbow) is observed. The observed effects are qualitatively interpreted in terms of current theoretical models.
The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 5 June 1985; accepted 15 July 1985 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/83/4800/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
ROTATIONAL STATES,
DISTRIBUTION,
NITRIC OXIDE,
MOLECULAR BEAMS,
GERMANIUM,
MOLECULE COLLISIONS,
COLLISIONS,
SURFACES
- 34.50.Ez
Atomic and molecular collision processes and interactions Inelastic scattering of atoms and molecules Rotational and vibrational energy transfer - 79.20.Rf
Electron and ion emission by liquids and solids; impact phenomena Impact phenomena (including electron spectra and sputtering) Atomic and molecular beam interactions with surfaces - YEAR: 1985
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (31)
-
A recent excellent review on gas-surface scattering dynamics has been published by J. A. Barker and D. J. Auerbach, Surf. Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (1985). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
-
T. Engel, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 373 (1978). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
M. S. Chou, A. M. Dean, and D. Stern, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 5962 (1983). [ISI]
-
J. P. Anderson, in Molecular Beams and Low Density Gas Dynamics, edited by P. P. Wegener (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974), p. 1.
-
H. Zacharias, M. M. T. Loy, P. A. Roland, and A. S. Sudbo, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3148 (1984). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
D. Golomb, R. E. Good, and R. F. Brown, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 1545 (1970). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
W. L. Jolly and W. M. Latimer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 5757 (1952); [ChemPort]
-
N. T. Batkin and R. J. Madix, Surf. Sci. 7, 109 (1967). [ChemPort]
-
(a) C. T. Campbell, G. Ertl, H. Kuipers, and J. Segner, Surf. Sci. 107, 220 (1981);
-
C. E. Brown and D. G. Hall, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 42, 334 (1973). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
-
R. J. Behm and C. R. Brundle, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1040 (1984). [ISI]
-
J. E. Hurst, C. A. Becker, J. P. Cowin, K. C. Janda, L. Wharton, and D. J. Wharton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1175 (1979). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
G. M. McClelland, G. D. Kubiak, H. G. Rennagel, and R. N. Zare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 831 (1981). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
A. W. Kleyn, A. C. Luntz, and D. J. Auerbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1169 (1981). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
G. D. Kubiak, J. E. Hurst, H. G. Rennagel, G. M. McClelland, and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 5163 (1983). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
R. R. Cavanagh and D. S. King, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1829 (1981). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
J. Segner, H. Robota, W. Vielhaber, G. Ertl, F. Frenkel, J. Häger, W. Krieger, and H. Walther, Surf. Sci. 131, 273 (1983). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
M. Asscher, W. L. Guthrie, T. H. Lin, and G. A. Somorjai, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 6992 (1983). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
D. J. Auerbach, A. W. Kleyn, A. C. Luntz, and J. E. Schlaegel (to be published).
-
J. W. Gadzuk, U. Landman, E. J. Kuster, C. L. Cleveland, and R. N. Barnett, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 426 (1982).
-
J. M. Bowman and J. L. Gossage, Chem. Phys. Lett. 96, 481 (1983). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
(a) W. Brenig, Z. Phys. B 48, 127 (1982); [ISI]
-
J. C. Tully and M. Cardillo, Science 223, 445 (1984). [MEDLINE]
-
W. Brenig, H. Kasai, and H. Müller, Surf. Sci. (in press).
-
J. A. Barker, A. W. Kleyn, and D. J. Auerbach, Chem. Phys. Lett. 97, 9 (1983).
-
H. Voges and R. Schinke, Chem. Phys. Lett. 100, 245 (1983); [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
S. Tanaka and S. Sugano, Surf. Sci. 136, 488 (1984). [Inspec]
-
J. E. Hurst, G. D. Kubiak, and R. N. Zare, Chem. Phys. Lett. 93, 235 (1982). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
E. Zamir and R. D. Levine, Chem. Phys. Lett. 104, 143 (1983). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
R. Schinke and R. B. Gerber, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 1567 (1985). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
J. C. Polanyi and R. J. Wolf, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 1555 (1985). [ChemPort]








