Mechanisms of spatial self-organization in isothermal kinetic oscillations during the catalytic CO oxidation on Pt single crystal surfaces
J. Chem. Phys. 90, 510 (1989); doi:10.1063/1.456501
Issue Date: 1 January 1989
You are logged in to this journal.
The rate of catalytic CO oxidation on Pt(100) and (110) surfaces at low pressures (
10−4 Torr) and under isothermal conditions may exhibit sustained temporal oscillations which are coupled with periodic transformations of the surface structures between reconstructed and nonreconstructed phases, the latter exhibiting higher oxygen sticking coefficients and hence higher reactivity. With Pt(100) the two surface phases exhibit a much larger difference in reactivity (=oxygen sticking coefficient) than with Pt(110), which effect accounts for the qualitative differences in the oscillatory behavior: if two of the control parameters (say pO2, T) are kept fixed, the third (pCO) may be varied with Pt(100) over a fairly wide range without leaving the oscillatory region. Minor (<1%) fluctuations of the partial pressures associated with the varying reaction rate are hence without any noticeable effect. Coupling between surface reaction and diffusion causes wave propagation of the surface phase transformations and therefore spatial self-organization, as demonstrated by scanning LEED experiments. With Pt(110), on the other hand, the oscillatory region is very narrow. In this case mass transport through the gas phase as caused by the small pressure variations associated with the reaction lead to synchronization between different parts of the surface. Computer simulations with the cellular automaton technique confirm qualitatively the experimental findings and support the conclusions reached.
The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
10−4 Torr) and under isothermal conditions may exhibit sustained temporal oscillations which are coupled with periodic transformations of the surface structures between reconstructed and nonreconstructed phases, the latter exhibiting higher oxygen sticking coefficients and hence higher reactivity. With Pt(100) the two surface phases exhibit a much larger difference in reactivity (=oxygen sticking coefficient) than with Pt(110), which effect accounts for the qualitative differences in the oscillatory behavior: if two of the control parameters (say pO2, T) are kept fixed, the third (pCO) may be varied with Pt(100) over a fairly wide range without leaving the oscillatory region. Minor (<1%) fluctuations of the partial pressures associated with the varying reaction rate are hence without any noticeable effect. Coupling between surface reaction and diffusion causes wave propagation of the surface phase transformations and therefore spatial self-organization, as demonstrated by scanning LEED experiments. With Pt(110), on the other hand, the oscillatory region is very narrow. In this case mass transport through the gas phase as caused by the small pressure variations associated with the reaction lead to synchronization between different parts of the surface. Computer simulations with the cellular automaton technique confirm qualitatively the experimental findings and support the conclusions reached.
The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 14 June 1988; accepted 22 September 1988 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/90/510/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
CARBON MONOXIDE,
OXIDATION,
SURFACE REACTIONS,
PLATINUM,
CATALYSIS,
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION,
NONEQUILIBRIUM,
OSCILLATIONS,
CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS
- 82.65.Jv
Physical chemistry Surface and interface chemistry Heterogeneous catalysis at surfaces - 82.20.Mj
Physical chemistry Chemical kinetics Nonequilibrium kinetics - 82.20.Wt
Physical chemistry Chemical kinetics Computational modeling; simulation - 82.20.Hf
Physical chemistry Chemical kinetics Mechanisms and product distribution - YEAR: 1988-89
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (37)
-
(a) P. Hugo, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 74, 121 (1970);
-
L. F. Razón and R. A. Schmitz, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 28, 89 (1986). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
H. U. Onken and E. Wicke, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 90, 976 (1986).
-
L. F. Razón, S.-M. Chang, and R. A. Schmitz, Chem. Eng. Sci. 41, 1561 (1986).
-
G. Ertl, P. R. Norton, and J. Rüstig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 177 (1982).
-
M. P. Cox, G. Ertl, R. Imbihl, and J. Rüstig, Surf. Sci. 134, L517 (1983). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
M. P. Cox, G. Ertl, and R. Imbihl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1725 (1985). [ISI] [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
-
R. Imbihl, M. P. Cox, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3519 (1986). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
M. Eiswirth and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 177, 90 (1986). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
S. B. Schwartz and L. D. Schmidt, Surf. Sci. 183, L269 (1987). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
S. Ladas, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 198, 42 (1988). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
P. R. Norton, P. E. Bindner, K. Griffiths, T. E. Jackman, J. A. Davies, and J. Rüstig, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3859 (1984). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
R. C. Yeates, J. E. Turner, A. J. Gellman and G. A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 149, 175 (1985). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
M. Ehsasi, J. H. Block, K. Christmann, and W. Hirschwald, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 5, 821 (1987).
-
R. Imbihl, M. P. Cox, G. Ertl, H. Müller, and W. Brenig, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1578 (1985).
-
P. Möller, K. Wetzl, M. Eiswirth, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 5328 (1986). [ISI]
-
S. Ladas, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 197, 153 (1988). [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
M. Eiswirth, R. Schwankner, and G. Ertl, Z. Phys. Chem. N. F. 144, 59 (1985).
-
See, for example, R. P. H. Gasser, An Introduction of Chemisorption and Catalysis by Metals (Clarendon, Oxford, 1985).
-
M. Eiswirth, K. Krischer, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 202, 565 (1988). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
S. Ladas, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl (in preparation).
-
R. J. Schwankner, M. Eiswirth, P. Möller, K. Wetzl, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 742 (1987). [ISI]
-
M. Eiswirth, Thesis, University of Munich, 1987.
-
M. Eiswirth and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1526 (1988). [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
-
M. Wilf and P. T. Dawson, Surf. Sci. 65, 399 (1977). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
R. Ducros and R. P. Merrill, Surf. Sci. 55, 227 (1976). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
V. S. Sundaram and P. H. Dawson, Surf. Sci. 146, L593 (1984). [Inspec]
-
N. Freyer, M. Kiskinova, G. Pirug, and H. P. Bonzel, Surf. Sci. 166, 206 (1986). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
See Refs. 15 and 16 for a compilation of the relevant literature.
-
P. Möller, Thesis, University of Munich, 1987.
-
K. Heinz, A. Barthel, L. Hammer, and K. Müller, Surf. Sci. 191, 174 (1987). [Inspec]
-
(a) R. Dagonnier, M. Dumont, and J. Nuyts, J. Catal. 66, 130 (1980);
-
R. J. Behm, P. A. Thiel, P. R. Norton, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 7437, 7448 (1983). [ChemPort]
-
(a) J. Fair and R. I. Madix, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 3480 (1980); [ISI] [ChemPort]
-
(a) G. Padberg and E. Wicke, Chem. Eng. Sci. 22, 1035 (1967); [ChemPort]
-
See, for example, Oscillations and Travelling Waves in Chemical Systems, edited by R. J. Field and M. Berger (Wiley, New York, 1985).
-
P. K. Tsai, M. B. Maple, and R. K. Herz, J. Catal. (to be published).
(c) M. Ehsasi, Thesis, FU Berlin, 1988 (in preparation).
(c) T. E. Jackman, J. A. Davies, D. P. Jackson, W. N. Unertl, and P. R. Norton, Surf. Sci. 120, 389 (1982). [Inspec]
(c) J. R. Brown, G. A. D'Netto, and R. A. Schmitz, in Temporal Order, edited by L. Rensing and N. I. Jaeger (Springer, Heidelberg, 1985) p. 86;
(d) D. J. Kaul and E. E. Wolf, J. Catal. 91, 216 (1985); [ISI] [ChemPort]
93, 321 (1985); [ChemPort]
(e) R. Sant and E. E. Wolf (to be published);
(f) H. U. Onken, Thesis, University of Münster, 1987;
H. U. Onken and E. Wicke (to be published);
(g) J. P. Dath and J. P. Dauchot, J. Catal. (tobe published).








