Is coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) more computationally intensive than quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD)?
J. Chem. Phys. 90, 3700 (1989); doi:10.1063/1.455827
Issue Date: 1 April 1989
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
It is shown that the recently proposed QCI method including all single and double substitutions has essentially the same computational requirements as the more complete CCSD approach. If properly formulated, the CCSD equations contain at most quadratic terms in the excitation amplitudes.
The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 21 October 1988; accepted 12 December 1988 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/90/3700/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE,
CONFIGURATION INTERACTION,
COMPUTER CALCULATIONS,
AB INITIO CALCULATIONS,
SCF CALCULATIONS,
POLYATOMIC MOLECULES
- 31.20.Tz
Electronic structure of atoms and molecules: theory Specific calculations and results Electron correlation and CI calculations - YEAR: 1988-89
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (17)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- J. A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, and K. Raghavachari, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5968 (1987)^
- J. Paldus, J. Čižek, and B. Jeziorski (preprint).
- R. J. Bartlett,
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 32, 359 (1981 ). - J. Paldus, J. Čižek, and I. Shavitt,
Phys. Rev. A 5, 50 (1972 ). - (a) G. D. Purvis and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 1284 (1981);
- G. E. Scuseria, C. L. Janssen, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 7382 (1988).
- G. E. Scuseria, A. C. Scheiner, T. J. Lee, J. E. Rice, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 2881 (1987).
- J. Gauss and D. Cremer,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 150, 280 (1988 ). - A. C. Scheiner, G. E. Scuseria, J. E. Rice, T. J. Lee, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5361 (1987).
- G. E. Scuseria, T. J. Lee, and H. F. Schaefer,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 130, 236 (1986 ). - P. Pulay, S. Saebo, and W. Meyer, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 1901 (1984).
- S. Saebo and P. Pulay, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 914 (1987).
- J. A. Pople, R. Krishnan, H. B. Schlegel, and J. S. Binkley,
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 14, 545 (1978 ). - K. Raghavachari, J. A. Pople, and M. Head-Gordon, (preprint).
- Reference 14, p. 2.
- See, for example, G. Fitzgerald, S. J. Cole, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1701 (1986);
- A. C. Scheiner, G. E. Scuseria, and H. F. Schaefer,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 8160 (1986 );
G. E. Scuseria, A. C. Scheiner, J. E. Rice, T. J. Lee, and H. F. Schaefer, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 21, 495 (1987);
J. F. Stanton, R. J. Bartlett, and W. N. Lipscomb,
M. Rittby and R. J. Bartlett,
D. Magers, E. A. Salter, R. J. Bartlett, C. Salter, B. A. Hess, and L. J. Schaad,
C. Sosa, J. Noga, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5974 (1988).
T. J. Lee, G. E. Scuseria, J. E. Rice, A. C. Scheiner, and H. F. Schaefer,
G. E. Scuseria and H. F. Schaefer,
B. H. Besler, G. E. Scuseria, A. C. Scheiner, and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 360 (1988);
H. Koch, G. E. Scuseria, A. C. Scheiner, and H. F. Schaefer,
G. E. Scuseria and H. F. Schaefer,
W. Thiel, G. E. Scuseria, H. F. Schaefer, and W. D. Allen, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4965 (1988);
R. S. Grev, G. E. Scuseria, A. C. Scheiner, H. F. Schaefer, and M. S. Gordon,
T. J. Lee, J. E. Rice, G. E. Scuseria, and H. F. Schaefer, Theor. Chim. Acta (in press);
G. E. Scuseria and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys. (in press).








