Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
High pressure Raman study of the CO stretching mode in liquid N,N-dimethylacetamide
The Raman 4 symmetric C=O stretching mode of N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) is reported as a function of pressure from 1 to 4000 bar within the temperature range 40 to 100 °C. As in acetone, the isot...
Next Article
Dynamic elements of mixed-mode oscillations and chaos in a peroxidase–oxidase model network
Three dynamic elements, DE-1, DE-2, and DE-3, are identified for the four-species Olsen model of the peroxidase–oxidase reaction. DE-1 is the damped Lotka oscillator which tends to generate smal...

High precision dipole moments in A-tilde 1A2 formaldehyde determined via Stark quantum beat spectroscopy

J. Chem. Phys. 90, 4150 (1989); doi:10.1063/1.455773

Issue Date: 15 April 1989

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

P. H. Vaccaro, A. Zabludoff, M. E. Carrera-Patiño, J. L. Kinsey, and R. W. Field
Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
The high resolution technique of Stark quantum beat spectroscopy is used to examine the electric dipole moment function for the first excited singlet state (A-tilde 1A2) of formaldehyde-h2 and formaldehyde-d2. The high precision of these measurements (i.e., better than 5 parts in 104) enables detailed determination of a-axis dipole moment components (µa ) for individual J=2 rovibronic levels in the nu4 out-of-plane bending mode. In the case of 21,1 rotational levels, we find µa (40)=1.4784(7) D and µa (41)=1.4678(4) D for H2CO. For D2CO the measured 21,1 dipole moments are µa (40)=1.4698(6) D, µa (41)=1.4693(3) D, and µa (43) =1.4786(7) D. The state-specific variations in µa revealed by this study reflect the structural influences exerted by the pervasive S1~S0 nonadiabatic interactions and the pyramidally distorted equilibrium configuration which characterize the A-tilde state of formaldehyde. The origin and experimental manifestation of the out-of-plane dipole moment component (µc ) in nonrigid A-tilde 1A2 formaldehyde is also discussed. The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 21 November 1988; accepted 28 December 1988
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/90/4150/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (2508 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 35.20.My
    Experimentally derived information on atoms and molecules; instrumentation and techniques Molecules Electric and magnetic moments (and derivatives), polarizability, and magnetic susceptibility
  • 33.55.Be
    Molecular spectra and interactions of molecules with photons Optical activity and dichroism; magnetooptical and electrooptical spectra Zeeman and Stark effects
  • 35.80.+s
    Experimentally derived information on atoms and molecules; instrumentation and techniques Atomic and molecular measurement and techniques
  • YEAR: 1988-89

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (82)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. W. Gordy and R. L. Cook, Techniques of Chemistry, Volume XVIII: Microwave Molecular Spectra (Wiley, New York, 1984).
  2. P. Debye, Polar Molecules (Chemical Catalog Company, New York, 1929);
  3. R. J. W. Le Févre, Dipole Moments: Their Measurement and Application in Chemistry (Wiley, New York, 1953);
  4. O. Exner, Dipole Moments in Organic Chemistry (Thieme, Stuttgart, 1975).
  5. A. D. Buckingham, in Advances in Chemical Physics, edited by J. O. Hirschfelder (Academic, New York, 1967), Vol. 12, p. 107.
  6. T. Oka, in Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, edited by D. R. Bates and I. Estermann (Academic, New York, 1973), Vol. 9, p. 127.
  7. A. D. Buckingham, in Medical Technical Publishing Company International Review of Science: Physical Chemistry, Series 1, edited by D. A. Ramsay (Butterworth, London, 1972), Vol. 3, p. 73.
  8. A. D. Buckingham, in Physical Chemistry: An Advanced Treatise, edited by H. Eyring, D. Henderson, and W. Jost (Academic, New York, 1970), Vol. 4, p. 349;
  9. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 80, 183 (1976).
  10. B. Fabricant, D. Krieger, and J. S. Muenter, J. Chem. Phys. 67, 1576 (1977).
  11. K. Tanaka, A. Inayoshi, K. Kijima, and T. Tanaka, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 95, 182 (1982).
  12. K. Tanaka, H. Ito, K. Harada, and T. Tanaka, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5893 (1984);
  13. T. Suzuki, S. Saito, and E. Hirota, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 111, 54 (1985).
  14. J. W. C. Johns and A. R. W. McKellar, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 48, 354 (1973);
  15. J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1682 (1975);
    M. Allegrini, J. W. C. Johns, and A. R. W. McKellar, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 66, 69 (1977).
  16. P. H. Vaccaro, J. L. Kinsey, R. W. Field, and H.-L. Dai, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 3659 (1988).
  17. D. E. Freeman and W. Klemperer, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 604 (1964);
  18. 45, 52 (1966).
  19. J. C. D. Brand, J. Chem. Soc. 1956, 858;
  20. G. W. Robinson, Can. J. Phys. 34, 699 (1956);
    V. T. Jones and J. B. Coon, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 31, 137 (1969).
  21. V. A. Job, V. Sethuraman, and K. K. Innes, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 30, 365 (1969).
  22. R. J. Garrison and H. F. SchaeferIII, J. Chem. Phys. 61, 3039 (1974).
  23. S. Bell and J. S. Crighton, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2 81, 1813 (1985).
  24. A. D. Walsh, J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2306.
  25. K. K. Innes, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 99, 294 (1983).
  26. C. B. Moore and J. C. Weisshaar, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34, 525 (1983).
  27. J. C. Weisshaar and C. B. Moore, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 5415, 2875 (1980).
  28. H.-L. Dai, R. W. Field, and J. L. Kinsey, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2161 (1985).
  29. D. R. Guyer, W. F. Polik, and C. B. Moore, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 6519 (1986).
  30. W. M. Gelbart, M. L. Elert, and D. F. Heller, Chem. Rev. 80, 403 (1980);
  31. S. H. Lin, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 352, 57 (1976);
    J. M. F. van Dijk, M. J. H. Kemper, J. H. M. Kerp, and H. M. Buck, J. Chem. Phys. 69, 2462 (1978);
    J. M. F. van Dijk, Ph.D. thesis, Technische Hogeschool Eindhoven, 1977.
  32. W. E. Henke, H. L. Selzle, T. R. Hays, E. W. Schlag, and S. H. Lin, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 1327 (1982).
  33. Wolfgang Demtröder, Laser Spectroscopy: Basic Concepts and Instrumentation), Springer, Berlin, 1981).
  34. J. N. Dodd and G. W. Series, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 263, 353 (1961).
  35. J. N. Dodd and G. W. Series, in Progress in Atomic Spectroscopy, edited by W. Hanle and H. Kleinpoppen (Plenum, New York, 1979), Vol. 2, p. 253.
  36. S. Haroche, in High Resolution Laser Spectroscopy, edited by K. Shimoda (Springer, Berlin, 1976), p. 253.
  37. R. Luypaert and J. van Craen, J. Phys. B 10, 3627 (1977);
  38. J. Mühlbach, M. Dubs, H. Bitto, and J. R. Huber, Chem. Phys. Lett. 111, 288 (1984);
    M. Dubs, P. Schmidt, and J. R. Huber, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6335 (1986).
  39. M. Brieger, A. Hese, A. Renn, and A. Sodeik, Chem. Phys. Lett. 76, 465 (1980);
  40. A. Hese, A. Renn, and H. S. Schweda, Opt. Comm. 20, 385 (1977);
    H. S. Schweda, A. Renn, H. Busener, and A. Hese, Chem. Phys. 98, 157 (1985).
  41. R. Wallenstein, J. A. Paisner, and A. L. Schawlow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 1333 (1974);
  42. P. J. Brucat and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 100 (1983);
    H. Watanabe and S. Tsuchiya, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 906 (1983);
    M. Dubs, J. Mühlbach, and J. R. Huber, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1288 (1986).
  43. K. Lendi, Chem. Phys. 46, 179 (1980);
  44. J. Chaiken, M. Gurnick, and J. D. McDonald, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 117 (1981);
    W. Rhodes, J. Phys. Chem. 87, 30 (1983);
    H. Saigusa and E. C. Lim, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 91 (1983);
    H. Bitto, H. Stafast, P. Russeger, and J. R. Huber, Chem. Phys. 84, 249 (1984).
  45. P. Schmidt, H. Bitto, and J. R. Huber, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 696 (1988);
  46. Z. Phys. D 7, 77 (1987).
  47. P. H. Vaccaro, J. L. Kinsey, and R. W. Field (in preparation).
  48. Richard N. Zare, Angular Momentum: Understanding Spatial Aspects in Chemistry and Physics (Wiley, New York, 1988).
  49. In Ref. 7, Fabricant et al. have suggested that a typical polarization anisotropy of 1 Å3 could, at most, contribute ~2×10−4 D to observed dipole moments in the formaldehyde system. The magnitude of this effect is slightly below the limits placed upon the precision of the present Stark measurements.
  50. P. H. Vaccaro, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
  51. R. L. Cook and F. C. De Lucia, Am. J. Phys. 39, 1433 (1971).
  52. P. Thaddeus, L. C. Krisher, and J. H. N. Loubser, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 257 (1964).
  53. P. R. Bunker, Molecular Symmetry and Spectroscopy (Academic, New York, 1979).
  54. R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 1997 (1955).
  55. D. C. Moule and A. D. Walsh, Chem. Rev. 75, 67 (1975).
  56. E. B. Aleksandrov, Opt. Spektrosk. 17, 957 (1964);
  57. J. N. Dodd, R. D. Kaul, and D. M. Warrington, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 84, 176 (1964),
    J. N. Dodd, W. J. Sande, and D. Zissermann, ibid. 92, 497 (1967).
  58. S. Gerstenkorn, J. Verges, and J. Chevillard, Atlas du Spectre d'Absorption de la Molecule d'lode 11.000–14.000 (Laboratoire Aime-Cotton C.N.R.S. II, Orsay, France, 1982).
  59. Instruction Manual for Fluke 335A Voltage Standard (Fluke, Seattle, Washington, 1979).
  60. Instruction Manual for Fluke 410B D.C. Power Supply (Fluke, Everett, Washington, 1965).
  61. F. W. Birss and D. A. Ramsay, Comp. Phys. Comm. 38, 83 (1984).
  62. T. Nakagawa and Y. Morino, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 38, 84 (1971);
  63. D. Coffey, Jr., C. Yamada and E. Hirota, ibid. 64, 98 (1977);
    M. Allegrini, J. W. C. Johns, and A. R. W. McKellar, ibid. 67, 476 (1977);
    D. Dangoisse, E. Willemot, and J. Bellet, ibid. 71, 414 (1978).
  64. V. Sethuraman, V. A. Job, and K. K. Innes, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 33, 189 (1970).
  65. B. J. Orr, Spectrochim. Acta A 30, 1275 (1973).
  66. D. J. Clouthier and D. A. Ramsay, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 34, 31 (1983).
  67. P. H. Vaccaro, F. Temps, S. Halle, J. L. Kinsey, and R. W. Field, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4819 (1988);
  68. P. H. Vaccaro, R. L. Redington, J. Schmidt, J. L. Kinsey, and R. W. Field, ibid. 82, 5755 (1985).
  69. R. Luypaert and J. van Craen, J. Phys. B 12, 2613 (1979);
  70. B. J. Dalton, ibid. 12, 2625 (1979).
  71. J. Bosse and H. Gabriel, Z. Phys. 266, 283 (1974);
  72. H. J. Andrä, in Annals of the Israel Physical Society: Proceedings of the Haifa International Workshop on Atomic Physics in Nuclear Experiments, edited by B. Rosner and R. Kalish (Adam Hilger, Bristol, England, 1976), Vol. 1, p. 374;
    K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications (Plenum, New York, 1981).
  73. D. W. Marquardt, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431 (1962).
  74. S. R. Jeges, A. J. McCaffery, and M. D. Rowe, Mol. Phys. 36, 845 (1978).
  75. D. A. Ramsay and S. M. Till, Can. J. Phys. 57, 1224 (1979);
  76. M. Barnett, D. A. Ramsay, and S. M. Till, Chem. Phys. Lett. 65, 440 (1979);
    C. M. L. Kerr, D. C. Moule, and D. A. Ramsay, Can. J. Phys. 61, 6 (1983).
  77. W. H. Eberhardt and H. Renner, J. Mol. Spectres. 6, 483 (1961);
  78. J. C. D. Brand and C. G. Stevens, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 3331 (1973);
    J. C. D. Brand and D. S. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. 78, 2270 (1974);
    F. W. Briss, D. A. Ramsay, and S. M. Till, Chem. Phys. Lett. 53, 14 (1978).
  79. S. A. Bagaev, I. N. Evtushenko, and V. B. Smirnov, Opt. Spectrosc. (USSR) 48, 8 (1980);
  80. A. A. Villaeys, J. Phys. B 16, 3775 (1983).
  81. T. Oka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 15, 2274 (1960);
  82. K. Takagi and T. Oka, ibid. 18, 1174 (1963).
  83. J. L. Duncan, Mol. Phys. 28, 1177 (1974).
  84. P. Jensen and P. R. Bunker, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 94, 114 (1982).
  85. I. Baraldi and M. C. Bruni, Gazz. Chim. Ital. 109, 595 (1979).
  86. I. Baraldi, J. Mol. Struct. 87, 345 (1982).
  87. N. J. Bridge, D. A. Haner, and D. A. Dows, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 4196 (1968).
  88. H. F. Schaefer III, The Electronic Structure of Atoms and Molecules: A Survey of Rigorous Quantum Mechanical Results (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1972);
  89. S. Green, in Advances in Chemical Physics, edited by I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (Academic, New York, 1974), Vol. 25, p. 179.
  90. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Course of Theoretical Physics Volume 3: Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon, New York, 1977).
  91. P. L. Goodfriend, F. W. Birss, and A. B. F. Duncan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 307 (1960);
  92. J. M. Foster and S. F. Boys, ibid. 32, 303 (1960);
    T. H. Dunning, Jr., N. W. Winter, and V. McKoy, J. Chem. Phys. 49, 4128 (1968).
  93. S. D. Peyerimhoff, R. J. Buenker, W. E. Kammer, and H. Hsu, Chem. Phys. Lett. 8, 129 (1971);
  94. P. G. Burton, S. D. Peyerimhoff, and R. J. Buenker, Chem. Phys. 73, 83 (1982).
  95. R. N. Dixon and M. R. Gunson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 101, 369 (1983).
  96. I. C. Hisatsune and D. F. Eggers, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 23, 487 (1955).
  97. R. E. Bruns and W. B. Person, J. Chem. Phys. 58, 2585 (1973).
  98. J. K. G. Watson, M. Takami, and T. Oka, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 5376 (1979).
  99. S. Golden and E. B. Wilson, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 16, 669 (1948).
  100. J. S. Muenter, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 5409 (1972);
  101. K. M. Mack and J. S. Muenter, ibid. 66, 5278 (1977).
  102. As can be readily demonstrated through the use of perturbation theory (Ref. 74), the Stark effect in a near prolate asymmetric rotor (e.g., formaldehyde) arises primarily as a result of interactions between the two levels comprising an asymmetry doublet. Since these eigenstates are initially of opposite parity, the field-induced partitioning of rovibronic character between them provides a means of producing the mixed parity states required for the manifestation of an electric dipole moment in a rotating molecular system (Refs. 5 and 37). Consequently, to lowest order, the Stark effects exhibited by the components of an asymmetry doublet should correspond to a single value for the dipole moment. This approximation breaks down, however, when higher order interactions involving adjacent rovibronic levels are taken into account.
  103. J. C. Weisshaar and C. B. Moore, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 5135 (1979).
  104. In Refs. 17(c) and 17(d), ab initio calculations performed by van Dijk and co-workers have indicated that the S1~S0 coupling elements for D2CO are an order of magnitude smaller than those in H2CO. Furthermore, at the Ã1A2 rovibronic energies examined in the present study, the isoenergetic X-tilde1A1 states are coupled to the H2 + CO dissociative continuum through a barrier (Ref. 19). The smaller tunnelling rates expected for the heavier deuterated species will therefore translate into narrower effective linewidths for the highly excited, lifetime-broadened S0 states. Since the strength of interaction between individual S1 and S0 rovibronic eigenstates are dominated by their effective separation in energy (Ref. 17), the reduced tunnelling propensity for D2CO (i.e., narrower S0 linewidths) suggest a smaller probability for S1~S0 mixing.
  105. M. P. Silverman, S. Haroche, and M. Gross, Phys. Rev. A 18, 1507, 1517 (1978).
  106. P. R. Bunker and B. M. Landsberg, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 67, 374 (1977).
  107. C. H. Townes and A. L. Schawlow, Microwave Spectroscopy (Dover, New York, 1975);
  108. M. Takami, H. Jones, and T. Oka, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 3557 (1970).
  109. H. C. Allen, Jr., and P. C. Cross, Molecular Vib-Rotors: The Theory and Interpretation of High Resolution Infrared Spectra (Wiley, New York, 1963).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.