Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Monte Carlo description of Af homopolymerization: Diffusional effects
We have developed a new algorithm that simulates the structure buildup process during homopolymerization of Af monomers. The algorithm is an off lattice percolation solution on a cube with periodic bo...
Next Article
Interchain dispersion and second hyperpolarizability of conjugated polymers
-electron dispersion forces between parallel conjugated strands are shown to alter (3) coefficients, even in the limit of nonoverlapping strands, through dipole processes involving virtual excitation ...

Kinetic oscillations in the NO + CO reaction on Pt(100): Experiments and mathematical modeling

J. Chem. Phys. 95, 2109 (1991); doi:10.1063/1.461010

Issue Date: 1 August 1991

You are logged in to this journal.

Th. Fink, J.-P. Dath, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl
Fritz Haber Institut der Max Planck Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, D 1000 Berlin 33, Germany
The reaction of NO and CO on Pt(100) exhibits two branches of steady state production of N2 and CO2 and the occurrence of kinetic oscillations. This system was studied under steady flow conditions in the 10−6 mbar total pressure range using low-energy electron diffraction-(LEED), work function measurement, and mass spectrometry for determination of the reaction rate. These studies revealed that kinetic oscillations can only be initiated from one of the two stable reaction branches. Two separate existence regions were detected in which the oscillations are always damped. Oscillations can be very reproducibly excited by slight decreases in temperature. The 1×1[large-closed-square]hex phase transition of the surface structure was observed to take place only in one of the two regions of reaction rate oscillations. Its influence seems to be of minor relevance to the mechanism of oscillations as oscillations in one region occur on the surface that maintains a 1×1 structure. The experiments were modeled by a set of coupled differential equations based on knowledge about the elementary reaction steps. The model calculations reproduced the steady states of the reaction as well as the occurrence of kinetic oscillations in different ranges in excellent agreement with experimental observation. In the model, the phase transition also has no relevance for the oscillation mechanism. The occurrence of oscillations can be rationalized in terms of a periodic sequence of autocatalytic ``surface explosions'' and the restoration of an adsorbate-covered surface. The damping, experimentally observed, is attributed to insufficient spatial coupling between different regions of the surface. The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 26 November 1990; accepted 15 April 1991
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/95/2109/1
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download PDF (2346 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.65.Jv
    Physical chemistry Surface and interface chemistry Heterogeneous catalysis at surfaces
  • 82.20.Hf
    Physical chemistry Chemical kinetics Mechanisms and product distribution
  • YEAR: 1990-91

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (39)

  1. P. Hugo, Ber. Bunsenges Phys. Chem. 74, 121 (1970).
  2. H. Beusch, P. Fieguth, and E. Wicke, Chem. Ing. Tech. 44, 445 (1972). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  3. R. Imbihl, in Springer Series in Synergetics, edited by P. J. Plath (Springer, Berlin, 1989), Vol. 44, pp. 26–64.
  4. G. Ertl, Adv. Catal. 37, 213 (1990). [ChemPort]
  5. S. P. Singh-Boparai and D. A. King, in: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Surface Science (ECOSS-3), Cannes, 1980.
  6. S. B. Schwartz and L. D. Schmidt, Surf. Sci. 183, L269 (1987). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  7. S. B. Schwartz and L. D. Schmidt, Surf. Sci. 206, 169 (1988). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  8. W. Adlhoch, H.-G. Lintz, and T. Weisker, Surf. Sci. 103, 576 (1981). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  9. H. Bolten, T. Hahn, J. Le Roux, and H. G. Lintz, Surf. Sci. 160, L529 (1985). [ISI]
  10. F. Schöth and E. Wicke, Ber. Bunsenges Phys. Chem. 93, 191 (1989); [ChemPort]
  11. 93, 491 (1989).
  12. R. Imbihl, M. P. Cox, G. Ertl, H. Möller, and W. Brenig, J. Chem. Phys. 83, 1578 (1985).
  13. R. Imbihl, M. P. Cox, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3519 (1986). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  14. W. F. Banholzer and R. I. Masel, Surf. Sci. 137, 339 (1984).
  15. M. W. Lesley and L. D. Schmidt, Surf. Sci. 155, 215 (1985). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  16. Th. Fink, J.-P. Dath, M. R. Bassett, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Vacuum 41, 301 (1990).
  17. Th. Fink, J.-P. Dath, M. R. Bassett, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 245, 96 (1991). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  18. K. Besocke and S. Berger, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 47, 840 (1976). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  19. R. J. Behm, P. A. Thiel, P. R. Norton, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 7437 (1983); [ChemPort]
  20. 78, 7448 (1983). [ChemPort]
  21. M. Eiswirth, R. Schwankner, and G. Ertl, Z. Phys. Chem. N. F. 144, 59 (1985).
  22. J.-P. Dath,Th.Fink,R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. (submitted).
  23. H. P. Bonzel, G. Brodén, and G. Pirug, J. Catal. 53, 96 (1978).
  24. J. L. Gland, Surf. Sci. 71, 327 (1978). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  25. R. L. Klein, S. Schwartz, and L. D. Schmidt, J. Phys. Chem. 89, 4908 (1985). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  26. W. Adlhoch and H.-G. Lintz, Surf. Sci. 78, 58 (1978). [Inspec]
  27. A. E. Morgan and G. A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 12, 405 (1968). [Inspec]
  28. Y. O. Park, W. F. Banholzer, and R. I. Masel, Surf. Sci. 155, 341 (1985). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  29. K. Heinz, E. Lang, K. Strauss, and K. Müller, Appl. Surf. Sci. 11/12, 611 (1982).
  30. P. R. Norton, J. A. Davies, D. K. Creber, C. W. Sitter, and T. E. Jackman, Surf. Sci. 108, 205 (1981). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  31. K. Griffiths, T. E. Jackman, J. A. Davies, and P. R. Norton, Surf. Sci. 138, 113 (1984). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  32. P. Gardner, M. Tiishaus, R. Martin, and A. M. Bradshaw, Surf. Sci. 240, 112 (1990).
  33. R. J. Gorte, L. D. Schmidt, and J. L. Gland, Surf. Sci. 109, 367 (1981). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  34. C. T. Campbell, G. Ertl, H. Kuipers, and J. Segner, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 5862 (1980).
  35. G. Pirug and H. P. Bonzel, J. Catal. 50, 64 (1977). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  36. R. J. Gorte and L. D. Schmidt, Surf. Sci. 111, 260 (1981). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  37. M. Eiswirth, P. Möller, K. Wetzl, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 510 (1989). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  38. Th. Fink, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 5002 (1989). [ChemPort]
  39. W. F. Banholzer, Y. O. Park, K. M. Mak, and R. I. Masel, Surf. Sci. 128, 176 (1983). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  40. Y. O. Park, W. F. Banholzer, and R. I. Masel, Appl. Surf. Sci. 19, 145 (1984 (ScienceDirect)). [Inspec]
  41. H. Miki, T. Nagase, T. Kioka, S. Sugai, and K. Kawasaki, Surf. Sci. 225, 1 (1990). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]