Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Angular and vibrational effects in the sticking and scattering of H2
The results of quantum mechanical simulations of H2 dissociation on metal surfaces are presented using an extension of the familiar two-dimensional ``elbow'' potential. By including corrugation parall...
Next Article
Molecular dynamics study of the coverage dependence of Xe desorption from Pt(111)
Molecular dynamics simulations with periodic boundary conditions are used to calculate temperature-programmed desorption spectra of Xe/Pt(111). The activation barrier is overcome using the compensatin...

Kinetic oscillations in catalytic CO oxidation on a cylindrical Pt single crystal surface

J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5193 (1992); doi:10.1063/1.463818

Issue Date: 1 October 1992

You are logged in to this journal.

M. Sander, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl
Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max Planck Gesellschaft, Faradayweg 4-6, W 1000 Berlin 33, Germany
A Pt single crystal of cylindrical shape (axis II [001]) whose surface exhibits all orientations of the [001] zone has been used to study coupling effects between orientations which exhibit kinetic oscillations in catalytic CO oxidation. On the clean surface, one can distinguish between an orientational range in between (110) and (320) which exhibits a 1×2 reconstruction, a nonreconstructed surface range around (210) and a hex reconstructed surface range around (100). Structural transitions proceed continuously via atomic steps between (110) and (210), while the orientational range extending from (210) to (100) is faceted. With a rotatable Kelvin probe, the orientational dependence of the work function could be followed. The results revealed that the variation of the oxygen sticking coefficient sO2 displays a mirror-like behavior with respect to the work function variation of the clean surface such that the orientation with the lowest work function (210) exhibits the highest sO2. Kinetic oscillations were studied in the 10−5 and 10−4 Torr range. By means of two Kelvin probes, the Deltaphi oscillations could be followed simultaneously at two different orientations, while the integral behavior of the cylinder surface was monitored via the CO2 production rate. A strong broadening of the oscillatory region in parameter space, as compared to a flat surface, was detected for the oscillatory range around (100). In the vicinity of this orientation, spatial coupling is provided via reaction fronts which propagate from (210) toward (110). Gas-phase coupling is only observed with the (110) orientations. Prolonged oscillation experiments cause faceting resulting in an increase of catalytic activity around (100), while the orientations around (210) lose catalytic activity by faceting. The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 20 April 1992; accepted 24 June 1992
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/97/5193/1
FULL TEXT OPTIONS   (FREE)
Download PDF (1586 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.65.Pa
    Physical chemistry Surface and interface chemistry Surface-enhanced molecular states and other gassurface interactions
  • 64.70.Kb
    Equations of state, phase equilibria, and phase transitions Phase equilibria, phase transitions, and critical points of specific substances Solidsolid transitions
  • YEAR: 1992

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (37)

  1. R. Imbihl, M. P. Cox, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3519 (1986). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  2. M. Eiswirth, P. Möller, K. Wetzl, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 510 (1989). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  3. S. Ladas, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 198, 42 (1988). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  4. M. Sander, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 6162 (1991).
  5. P. Heilmann, K. Heinz, and K. Müller, Surf. Sci. 83, 487 (1979). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  6. M. A. Van Hove, R. J. Koestner, P. C. Stair, J. P. Bibérian, L. L. Kesmodel, K. I. Bartos, and G. A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 103, 189 (1981). [Inspec]
  7. P. R. Norton, J. A. Davies, D. K. Creber, C. W. Sitter, and T. E. Jackman, Surf. Sci. 108, 205 (1981). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  8. R. J. Behm, W. Hösler, E. Ritter, and G. Binning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 228 (1986). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  9. H. Niehus, Surf. Sci. 145, 407 (1984). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  10. T. E. Jackman, J. A. Davies, D. P. Jackson, W. N. Unertl, and P. R. Norton, Surf. Sci. 120, 389 (1982). [Inspec]
  11. T. Gritsch, D. Coulman, R. J. Behm, and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1086 (1989). [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
  12. P. Fery, W. Moritz, and D. Wolf, Phys. Rev. B 38, 7275 (1988). [ISI] [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
  13. X.-G. Zhang, M. A. Van Hove, G. A. Somorjai, P. J. Rous, D. Tobin, A. Gonis, J. M. MacLaren, K. Heinz, M. Michl, H. Lindner, K. Müller, M. Ehsasi, and J. H. Block, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1298 (1991). [ISI] [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
  14. T. Gritsch, D. Coulman, R. J. Behm, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 257, 297 (1991). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  15. R. Smoluchowski, Phys. Rev. 60, 661 (1941).
  16. K. Griffiths, T. E. Jackman, J. A. Davies, and P. R. Norton, Surf. Sci. 138, 113 (1984). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  17. N. Freyer, M. Kiskinova, G. Pirug, and H. P. Bonzel, Surf. Sci. 166, 206 (1986). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  18. M. Ehsasi, M. Matloch, O. Frank, J. H. Block, K. Christmann, F. S. Rys, and W. Hirschwald, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4949 (1989). [ChemPort]
  19. S. Ladas, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 197, 153 (1988). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  20. J. Falta, R. Imbihl, and M. Henzler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1409 (1990). [ISI] [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
  21. M. Sander and R. Imbihl, Surf. Sci. 255, 61 (1991). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  22. M. Sander, R. Imbihl, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 251/252, 921 (1991).
  23. M. Eiswirth, R. J. Schwankner, and G. Ertl, Z. Phys. Chem. N. F. 144, 59 (1985).
  24. M. Ehsasi, S. Rezaie-Serej, J. H. Block, and K. Christmann, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 7596 (1990). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  25. M. P. Cox, G. Ertl, and R. Imbihl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1725 (1985). [ISI] [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
  26. H. H. Rotermund, S. Jakubith, A. von Oertzen, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4942 (1989). [ChemPort]
  27. M. Sander, G. Veser, and R. Imbihl, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 2495 (1992). [ISI] [ChemPort]
  28. S. Jakubith, H. H. Rotermund, W. Engel, A. von Oertzen, and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3013 (1990). [MEDLINE]
  29. R. Imbihl, S. Ladas, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 215, L307 (1989).
  30. M. Eiswirth and G. Ertl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1526 (1988). [MEDLINE] [ChemPort]
  31. M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos and L. D. Schmidt, Prog. Surf. Sci. 9, 83 (1979). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]
  32. D. W. Blakely and G. A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 65, 419 (1977). [Inspec] [ChemPort]
  33. H. Hopster, H. Ibach, and G. Comsa, J. Catal. 46, 37 (1977). [ISI]
  34. S. Daiser and K. Wandelt, Surf. Sci. 128, L213 (1983).
  35. R. J. Behm, P. A. Thiel, P. R. Norton, and G. Ertl, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 7437 (1983). [ChemPort]
  36. L. Vishnevski and V. I. Savchenko, Kinet. Katal. 28, 1516 (1987). [ChemPort]
  37. R. Imbihl, M. Sander, and G. Ertl, Surf. Sci. 204, L701 (1988). [Inspec] [ISI] [ChemPort]