Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
The infrared spectrum of He–HCO+
The vibrational predissociation spectrum of the He–HCO+ proton bound complex has been recorded in the 3 µm (C–H stretch) region by monitoring the HCO+ photofragment current. A rotati...
Next Article
Unified derivation of the dipolar field and relaxation terms in the Bloch-Redfield equations of liquid NMR
The standard theory of NMR relaxation in liquids (with molecular motion described as a classical Brownian motion, and including intermolecular spin–spin couplings) is re-examined, taking great c...

Spectroscopy of the fluoromethylene radicals HCF and DCF by 2+1 resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization spectroscopy and by ab initio calculation

J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1303 (1995); doi:10.1063/1.469807

Issue Date: 22 July 1995

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Karl K. Irikura, Jeffrey W. Hudgens, and Russell D. Johnson III
Chemical Kinetics and Thermodynamics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Spectra of fluoromethylene radicals, HCF and DCF, have been observed between 304 and 325 nm using mass-resolved, resonance enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI). Singlet HCF is generated by sequential reactions of atomic fluorine in either methane or methyl fluoride. The spectra arise from two-photon resonances between the ground state X-tilde 1A[prime] and the previously unobserved E-tilde 1A[prime] (3p) Rydberg state. The band origins lie at T0=62154±2 cm−1 (321.69±0.01 nm) and T0=62175±2 cm−1 (321.58±0.01 nm) (2sigma) above the ground states for HCF and DCF, respectively. Vibrational resolution and partial rotational resolution are obtained, with nu<sub>2</sub><sup>[prime]</sup>=1128±4 cm−1 and nu<sub>3</sub><sup>[prime]</sup>=1614±4 cm−1 for HCF and nu<sub>1</sub><sup>[prime]</sup>=2095±5 cm−1, nu<sub>2</sub><sup>[prime]</sup>=872±3 cm−1, and nu<sub>3</sub><sup>[prime]</sup>=1582±4 cm−1 for DCF (2sigma). Under typical experimental conditions, the strongest peak for HCF is due to the 2<sup>1</sup><sub>0</sub>3<sup>1</sup><sub>0</sub> resonance at 308.23±0.04 nm and the strongest peak for DCF is due to the 2<sup>2</sup><sub>0</sub> resonance at 312.85±0.01 nm. The results of vibrational and rotational analyses are consistent with predictions from ab initio calculations, which also yield the adiabatic ionization potential IPa=10.06±0.05 eV (2sigma). The Journal of Chemical Physics is copyrighted by The American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 21 March 1995; accepted 17 April 1995
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/103/1303/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (222 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 33.20.-t
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Molecular spectra
  • 31.15.Ar
    Electronic structure of atoms, molecules and their ions: theory Calculations and mathematical techniques in atomic and molecular physics (excluding electron correlation calculations) Ab initio calculations
  • 33.80.Rv
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Photon interactions with molecules Multiphoton ionization and excitation to highly excited states (e.g., Rydberg states)
  • YEAR: 1995

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (37)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. A. J. Merer and D. N. Travis, Can. J. Phys. 44, 1541 (1966).
  2. M. Kakimoto, S. Saito, and E. Hirota, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 88, 300 (1981).
  3. R. I. Patel, G. W. Stewart, K. Casleton, J. L. Gole, and J. R. Lombardi, Chem. Phys. 52, 461 (1980).
  4. C. Moore, M. Erickson, and M. Kaufman, Combust. Flame 87, 136 (1991).
  5. M. N. R. Ashfold, F. Castaño, G. Hancock, and G. W. Ketley, Chem. Phys. Lett. 73, 421 (1980).
  6. K. Hakuta, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 106, 56 (1984).
  7. Y. Qiu, S. Zhou, and J. Shi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 136, 93 (1987).
  8. K. K. Irikura and J. W. Hudgens, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 518 (1992).
  9. K. K. Irikura, R. D. Johnson III, and J. W. Hudgens, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 6131 (1992).
  10. M. K. Gilles, K. M. Ervin, J. Ho, and W. C. Lineberger, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 1130 (1992).
  11. S. G. Lias, Z. Karpas, and J. F. Liebman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 6089 (1985).
  12. Certain commercial materials and equipment are identified in this paper in order to specify procedures completely. In no case does such identification imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply that the material or equipment identified is necessarily the best available for the purpose.
  13. R. D. Johnson III, B. P. Tsai, and J. W. Hudgens, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4558 (1988).
  14. C. E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels (U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C., 1971).
  15. Gaussian 92, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, M. Head-Gordon, P. M. W. Gill, M. W. Wong, J. B. Foresman, B. G. Johnson, H. B. Schlegel, M. A. Robb, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, J. L. Andres, K. Raghavachari, J. S. Binkley, C. Gonzalez, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. J. P. Stewart, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1992.
  16. Gaussian 92/DFT, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. W. Wong, J. B. Foresman, M. A. Robb, M. Head- Gordon, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, J. L. Andres, K. Raghavachari, J. S. Binkley, C. Gonzalez, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. J. P. Stewart, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1993.
  17. M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, M. S. Gordon, K. A. Nguyen, T. L. Windus, and S. T. Elbert, QCPE Bull. 10, 52 (1990).
  18. M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. J. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, and J. A. Montgomery, J. Comput. Chem. 14, 1347 (1993).
  19. L. A. Curtiss, K. Raghavachari, G. W. Trucks, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 7221 (1991).
  20. C. W. Bauschlicher, Jr. and I. Shavitt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 739 (1978).
  21. S.-J. Kim, T. P. Hamilton, and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2063 (1991).
  22. R. J. Bartlett and J. F. Stanton, Applications of Post-Hartree-Fock Methods: A Tutorial, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, edited by K. B. Lipkowitz (VCH, New York, 1994), Vol. 5, pp. 65–169.
  23. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Clarendon, Oxford, 1973).
  24. L. Andrews and F. T. Prochaska, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 4714 (1979).
  25. L. Andrews, J. M. Dyke, N. Jonathan, N. Keddar, A. Morris, and A. Ridha, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 2364 (1984).
  26. W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. v. R. Schleyer, and J. A. Pople, Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory (Wiley, New York, 1986).
  27. T. Suzuki, S. Saito, and E. Hirota, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 90, 447 (1981).
  28. R. C. Weast, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC, Cleveland, 1976).
  29. J. W. Hudgens, C. S. Dulcey, G. R. Long, and D. J. Bogan, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 4546 (1987).
  30. R. D. Johnson III, G. R. Long, and J. W. Hudgens, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 1977 (1987).
  31. J. W. Hudgens, T. G. DiGiuseppe, and M. C. Lin, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 571 (1983).
  32. N. Russo, E. Sicilia, and M. Toscano, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 5031 (1992).
  33. G. E. Scuseria, M. Durán, R. G. A. R. Maclagan, and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 3248 (1986).
  34. C. W. Bauschlicher, Jr., H. F. Schaefer III, and P. S. Bagus, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 7106 (1977).
  35. A. C. Hopkinson and M. H. Lien, Can. J. Chem. 63, 3582 (1985).
  36. T. Suzuki and E. Hirota, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 6778 (1988).
  37. M. E. Jacox and D. E. Milligan, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 3252 (1969).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics