Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Femtosecond time-resolved studies of coherent vibrational Raman scattering in large gas-phase molecules
Results are presented from femtosecond time-resolved coherent Raman experiments in which we excite and monitor vibrational coherence in gas-phase samples of benzene and 1,3,5-hexatriene. Different phy...
Next Article
Diffraction mechanisms in gas-phase laser induced grating spectroscopy of vibrational overtone transitions
We have investigated the grating formation mechanism in laser-induced grating spectroscopy by preparing transient gratings via excitation of O–H vibrational overtones in water vapor. In principl...

Vibrational wave packets in the C 1Piu state of Cs2: Two color pump–probe experiments

J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10473 (1995); doi:10.1063/1.469897

Issue Date: 22 December 1995

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

G. Rodriguez, P. C. John, and J. G. Eden
Everitt Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Two color, pump–probe laser experiments on the ~100 fs time scale have been applied to examining the dynamics of vibrational wave packets in the C 1Piu state of Cs2. Wave packets consisting of more than 20 C state vibrational levels are produced with an initial pulse having a central wavelength between ~620 and 680 nm. The temporal history of the wave packet is inferred from the time and energy-integrated photoelectron signal produced when the excited state is photoionized by a time-delayed pulse centered at 605, 610, 615, 617, or 620 nm. Because of the difference in equilibrium internuclear separations for the Cs2(C) and Cs<sup> + </sup><sub>2</sub>(X) states (DeltaRe[approximately-equal-to]0.75 Å), wave packets are readily observed (signal-to-noise ratio >~10) without the need to resort to mass selection techniques. Frequency analysis of the wave packet data shows a dominant (fundamental) component that decreases from 29 to ~28.3 cm−1 as the pump wavelength is tuned from 627 to 641 nm. Other spectral modes at ~23.5 and ~34 cm−1 and a weaker term at twice the fundamental frequency are also observed and quantum mechanical calculations of the wavepacket motion are in accord with the experimental results. ©1995 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 10 August 1995; accepted 11 September 1995
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/103/10473/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (374 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 33.20.Tp
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Molecular spectra Vibrational analysis
  • 33.60.Cv
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Photoelectron spectra Ultraviolet and vacuum ultraviolet photoelectron spectra
  • 39.30.+w
    Instrumentation and techniques for atomic and molecular physics Spectroscopic techniques
  • YEAR: 1995

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (49)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. M. Dantus, M. J. Rosker, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2395 (1987).
  2. T. S. Rose, M. J. Rosker, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 6672 (1988).
  3. M. J. Rosker, M. Dantus, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6113 (1988).
  4. T. S. Rose, M. J. Rosker, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 7415 (1989).
  5. J. Misewich, J. H. Glownia, J. E. Rothenberg, and P. P. Sorokin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 150, 374 (1988).
  6. M. Dantus, R. M. Bowman, M. Gruebele, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 7437 (1989).
  7. R. M. Bowman, M. Dantus, and A. H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett. 161, 297 (1989).
  8. J. Misewich, J. H. Glownia, and P. P. Sorokin, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 3335 (1990).
  9. M. Gruebele, G. Roberts, R. M. Bowman, and A. H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett. 166, 459 (1990).
  10. L. R. Khundkar and A. H. Zewail, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 41, 15 (1990).
  11. T. Baumert, B. Bühler, R. Thalweiser, and G. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 733 (1990).
  12. M. Gruebele, G. Roberts, and A. H. Zewail, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 332, 35 (1990).
  13. M. Dantus, M. H. M. Janssen, and A. H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett. 181, 281 (1991).
  14. M. Gruebele, I. R. Sims, E. D. Potter, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 7763 (1991).
  15. M. Dantus, M. J. Rosker, and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6128 (1988).
  16. M. H. M. Janssen, R. M. Bowman, and A. H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett. 172, 99 (1990).
  17. T. Baumert, M. Grosser, R. Thalweiser, and G. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3753 (1991).
  18. G. Rodriguez and J. G. Eden, Chem. Phys. Lett. 205, 371 (1993).
  19. F. W. Loomis and P. Kusch, Phys. Rev. 46, 292 (1934).
  20. R. P. Benedict, D. L. Drummond, and L. A. Schlie, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 4600 (1977).
  21. R. Gupta, W. Happer, J. Wagner, and E. Wennmyr, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 799 (1978).
  22. P. Kusch and M. M. Hessel, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 25, 205 (1968).
  23. P. Kusch and M. M. Hessel, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 32, 181 (1969).
  24. M. Raab, G. Hönig, W. Demtröder, and C. R. Vidal, J. Chem. Phys. 76, 4370 (1982).
  25. C. Amiot, W. Demtröder, and C. R. Vidal, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5265 (1988).
  26. C. B. Collins, F. W. Lee, J. A. Anderson, P. A. Vicharelli, D. Popescu, and I. Popescu, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 1067 (1981).
  27. H. Weickenmeier, U. Diemer, M. Wahl, M. Raab, W. Demtröder, and W. Müller, J. Chem. Phys. 82, 5354 (1985).
  28. This state is occasionally labeled b 3Sigma<sub>u</sub><sup>+</sup> or (2)3Sigma<sub>u</sub><sup>+</sup> in the literature.
  29. E. K. Kraulinya, S. M. Papernov, and M. L. Janson, Chem. Phys. Lett. 63, 531 (1979).
  30. H. Katô, K. Yokoyama, M. Baba, N. Tamai, I. Yamazaki, and S. Nagakura, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 1987 (1987).
  31. M. Baba, T. Nakahori, T. Iida, and H. Katô, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 4637 (1990).
  32. R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 247 (1960).
  33. K. Yokoyama, M. Baba, and H. Katô, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 1209 (1988).
  34. H. Katô, T. Kobayashi, M. Chosa, T. Nakahori, T. Iida, S. Kasahara, and M. Baba, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2600 (1991).
  35. T. Kobayashi, T. Usui, T. Kamauchi, M. Baba, K. Ishikawa, and H. Katô, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 2670 (1993).
  36. R. L. Fork, C. V. Shank, and R. T. Yen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 41, 223 (1982).
  37. H. Suemitsu, H. Kitaura, and K. Seki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62, 3425 (1993), and references cited therein.
  38. M. Lapp and L. P. Harris, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Trans. 6, 169 (1966).
  39. M. Gruebele and A. H. Zewail, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 883 (1993).
  40. T. Baumert, B. Bühler, M. Grosser, R. Thalweiser, V. Weiss, E. Wiedenmann, and G. Gerber, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 8103 (1991).
  41. T. Baumert, V. Engel, C. Röttgermann, W. T. Strunz, and G. Gerber, Chem. Phys. Lett. 191, 639 (1992).
  42. V. Engel, H. Metiu, R. Almeida, R. A. Marcus, and A. H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett. 152, 1 (1988).
  43. V. Engel and H. Metiu, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 6116 (1989);
    44. 91, 1596 (1989).
  44. H. Metiu and V. Engel, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5693 (1990).
  45. M. D. Feit and J. A. Fleck, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 301 (1983).
  46. M. D. Feit and J. A. Fleck, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2078 (1984).
  47. L. Von Szentpaly, P. Fuentealba, H. Preuss, and H. Stoll, Chem. Phys. Lett. 93, 555 (1982).
  48. M. Krauss and W. J. Stevens, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 4236 (1990).
  49. A. Wetmore, F. K. Men, M. Kimura, and R. E. Olson (unpublished).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics