Journal of Chemical Physics
Feedback | Help | Exit
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
A semi-empirical scheme for generalized valence bond calculations on water complexes
A method is introduced for carrying out semi-empirical energy calculations using a localized valence-bond wavefunction. Chemical bonds are described by correlated electron pairs, with interactions bet...
Next Article
Calculation of ionization energies, electron affinities, electronegativities, and hardnesses using density functional methods
The performance of two exact exchange methods is tested in the calculation of ionization energies, electron affinities, electronegativities, and hardnesses using Dunning's correlation consistent basis...

Theoretical study of the valence ionization energies and electron affinities of linear C2n+1 (n=1–6) clusters

J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3258 (1997); doi:10.1063/1.473064

Issue Date: 22 February 1997

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

M. Ohno
Center for Atomic, Molecular, and Surface Physics, School of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia 6150, Australia

V. G. Zakrzewski and J. V. Ortiz
Department of Chemistry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131

W. von Niessen
Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, D-38106 Braunschweig, Federal Republic of Germany
The valence level hole spectral functions of linear C2n+1 (n=1–6) clusters are calculated by the ab initio third order algebraic diagrammatic construction [ADC(3)] Green function method and the outer-valence Green function (OVGF) method using an extended basis set. The vertical electron affinities of linear C2n+1 (n=1–6) clusters are also evaluated by the same methods. With an increase of the number of carbon atoms, the KT energy levels become more closely spaced and start to form quasi-continua. The original spectral strength of the main line becomes distributed over several lines of comparable intensity. With an increase of the number of carbon atoms, the one-electron (or even quasi-particle) picture of the ionization breaks down because of the interaction between the initial single hole level and the final two-hole-one-particle levels. The spectral intensity of the first four ionization levels remains fairly constant independent of the number of carbon atoms. The agreement of the affinities of C2n+1 (n=1–6) with experiment is in general very good. Two anionic states are found to be bound for C9,  C11 and C13. ©1997 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 20 August 1996; accepted 14 November 1996
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/106/3258/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download PDF (206 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 31.15.Ar
    Electronic structure of atoms, molecules and their ions: theory Calculations and mathematical techniques in atomic and molecular physics (excluding electron correlation calculations) Ab initio calculations
  • 36.40.-c
    Studies of special atoms, molecules, and their ions; clusters Atomic and molecular clusters
  • 33.15.Ry
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Properties of molecules and molecular ions Ionization potentials, electron affinities, molecular core binding energy
  • 02.30.-f
    Mathematical methods in physics Function theory, analysis
  • YEAR: 1996-97

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (28)
View in Separate Window/Tab
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. S. Yang, K. J. Taylor, M. J. Craycraft, J. Conceicao, C. L. Pettiette, O. Cheshnovsky, and R. E. Smalley, Chem. Phys. Lett. 144, 431 (1988).
  2. S. H. Yang, C. L. Pettiette, J. Conceicao, O. Cheshnovsky, and R. E. Smalley, Chem. Phys. Lett. 139, 233 (1987).
  3. D. W. Arnold, S. E. Bradforth, T. N. Kitsopoulous, and D. M. Neumark, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 8753 (1991).
  4. M. Algranati, H. Feldman, D. Kella, E. Miklazky, R. Naaman, Z. Vager, and J. Zajfman, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 4617 (1989).
  5. Z. Vager, H. Feldman, D. Kella, E. Malkin, E. Miklazky, J. Zajfman, and R. Naaman, Z. Phys. D 19, 413 (1991).
  6. K. S. Pitzer and E. Clementi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 4477 (1959).
  7. R. S. Whiteside, R. Krishnan, D. J. DeFrees, J. A. Pople, and P. v. R. Schleyer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 78, 538 (1981);
    8. D. H. Magers, R. J. Harrison, and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3284 (1986);
    B. K. Rao, S. N. Khanna, and P. Jena, Solid State Commun. 58, 53 (1986).
  8. K. Raghavachari, R. A. Whiteside, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6623 (1986).
  9. V. Parasuk and J. Almlöf, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 1137 (1989).
  10. V. Pless, H. U. Sulter, and B. Engels, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4042 (1994).
  11. J. Hütter and H. P. Lüthi, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 2213 (1994).
  12. J. D. Watts and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 3445 (1992).
  13. J. D. Watts and R. J. Bartlett, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 409 (1994).
  14. A. J. Heeger, S. Kivelson, J. R. Schrieffer, and W.-P. Su, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 782 (1988).
  15. J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 7531 (1992).
  16. J. D. Watts and R. J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 27, 51 (1993).
  17. J. V. Ortiz and V. G. Zakrzewski, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6614 (1994).
  18. V. G. Zakrzewski and J. V. Ortiz, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 294 (1995).
  19. J. Schirmer, L. S. Cederbaum, and O. Walter, Phys. Rev. A 28, 1237 (1983).
  20. W. von Niessen, J. Schirmer, and L. S. Cederbaum, Comput. Phys. Rep. 1, 57 (1984).
  21. L. S. Cederbaum, W. Domcke, J. Schirmer, and W. von Niessen, Adv. Chem. Phys. 65, 115 (1986).
  22. P. O. Widmark, P.-Â. Malmqvist, and B. O. Roos, Theor. Chim. Acta 79, 290 (1990).
  23. K. Andersson, M. R. A. Blomberg, M. P. Fülscher, V. Kellö, R. Lindh, P.-Â. Malmqvist, J. Noga, J. Olsen, B. O. Roos, A. L. Sadlej, P. E. M. Siegbahn, M. Urban, and P.-O. Widmark, MOLCAS, Version 2, University of Lund, Sweden, 1991.
  24. E. R. Davidson, J. Comput. Phys. 17, 87 (1975);
    25. B. Liu (unpublished);
    F. Tarantelli (unpublished).
  25. E. A. Rohlfing, D. M. Cox, and A. Kaldor, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3322 (1984).
  26. J. Drowat, R. P. Burns, G. De Maria, and M. G. Inghram, J. Chem. Phys. 31, 1131 (1959).
  27. J. M. Oakes and G. B. Ellison, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3322 (1984).
  28. T. N. Kitsopoulous, C. J. Chick, Y. Zhao, and D. M. Neumark, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 5479 (1991).

CITING ARTICLES
For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.


Copyright © American Institute of Physics