Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Dielectric relaxation in the lead–iron oxide glass system
The dielectric properties of the PbO–Fe2O3 glassy system are reported in the frequency range 102–106 Hz and in the temperature range 300–500 K. The experimental data have been analyz...
Next Article
A collaborative theoretical and experimental study of the structure and electronic excitation spectrum of the Bar and Bar2 complexes
We report the investigation of the 3s2p transition in the Bar2 cluster. In a supersonic expansion of B atoms entrained in Ar, at high beam source backing pressures we observe several features in the f...

Incorporation of angular momentum anisotropy into the analysis of resonant four-wave mixing spectroscopy

J. Chem. Phys. 106, 6314 (1997); doi:10.1063/1.473620

Issue Date: 15 April 1997

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Thierry A. W. Wasserman and Patrick H. Vaccaro
Department of Chemistry, Yale University, 225 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8107

Bruce R. Johnson
Department of Chemistry and Rice Quantum Institute, Rice University, MS102, Houston, Texas 77251-1892
A state-multipole expansion of the zero-order density operator has been used to derive analytical signal expressions for near-resonant degenerate four-wave mixing spectroscopy performed on systems that possess angular momentum anisotropy. The predictions of this formalism are found to be in good agreement with experimental optical–optical double resonance measurements involving aligned intermediate states. ©1997 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 11 December 1996; accepted 15 January 1997
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/106/6314/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (164 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 42.65.Hw
    Optics Nonlinear optics Phase conjugation, optical mixing, and photorefractive effect
  • YEAR: 1996-97

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (38)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
  2. R. L. Farrow and D. J. Rakestraw, Science 257, 1894 (1992).
  3. P. H. Vaccaro, in Nonlinear Spectroscopy for Molecular Structure Determination, edited by E. Hirota, R. W. Field, J. P. Maier, and S. Tsuchiya (Blackwell Scientific, London, 1997).
  4. M. A. Buntine, D. W. Chandler, and C. C. Hayden, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 707 (1992);
  5. 102, 2718 (1995).
  6. T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5460 (1993).
  7. J. R. Dunlop and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 856 (1993).
  8. V. Sick, M. N. Bui-Pham, and R. L. Farrow, Opt. Lett. 20, 2036 (1995).
  9. T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5469 (1993).
  10. T. A. W. Wasserman, A. A. Arias, S. A. Kandel, D. Hsu, and P. H. Vaccaro, SPIE 2548, 220 (1995);
  11. T. A. W. Wasserman, A. A. Arias, T. Müller, and P. H. Vaccaro, Chem. Phys. Lett. 262, 329 (1996).
  12. Q. Zhang, S. A. Kandel, T. A. W. Wasserman, and P. H. Vaccaro, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 1640 (1992);
  13. S. A. Kandel, T. A. W. Wasserman, Q. Zhang, H. Wang, A. A. Arias, and P. H. Vaccaro, SPIE 1858, 126 (1993).
  14. T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1595 (1992);
  15. J. D. Tobiason, J. R. Dunlop, and E. A. Rohlfing, ibid. 103, 1448 (1995).
  16. P. H. Vaccaro, in Molecular Dynamics and Spectroscopy by Stimulated Emission Pumping, edited by H. L. Dai and R. W. Field (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 1.
  17. M. Ducloy and D. Bloch, J. Physique 42, 711 (1981).
  18. R. L. Abrams, J. F. Lam, R. C. Lind, D. G. Steel, and P. F. Liao, in Optical Phase Conjugation, edited by R. A. Fisher (Academic, San Diego, 1983), p. 211.
  19. B. Attal-Trétout, P. Monot, and K. Müller-Dethlefs, Mol. Phys. 73, 1257 (1991).
  20. I. Aben, W. Ubachs, G. van der Zwan, and W. Hogervorst, Mol. Phys. 76, 591 (1992).
  21. H. Bervas, S. Le Boiteux, L. Labrunie, and B. Attal-Trétout, Mol. Phys. 79, 911 (1993).
  22. S. Williams, R. N. Zare, and L. A. Rahn, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1072, 1093 (1994);
  23. 104, 3947 (1996).
  24. S. Williams, J. D. Tobiason, J. R. Dunlop, and E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 8342 (1995);
  25. S. Williams, E. A. Rohlfing, L. A. Rahn, and R. N. Zare, ibid. 106, 3090 (1997).
  26. P. N. Butcher and D. Cotter, The Elements of Nonlinear Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).
  27. For studies performed in nonstationary media, P<sub>s</sub><sup>(3)</sup> must be averaged over the normalized distribution of target velocities, f(v). The moving molecules will experience velocity-dependent offsets in the frequencies of impinging electromagnetic waves (i.e., omegad = omegakd·v, thereby resulting in a preferential sensitivity for individual velocity groups which manifests itself as a sub-Doppler spectral response.
  28. T. K. Yee and T. K. Gustafson, Phys. Rev. A 18, 1597 (1978);
  29. Y. Prior, IEEE J. Quantum Electron QE-20, 37 (1984).
  30. These susceptibility terms differ from the more conventional equilibrium expressions since the DFWM interaction begins with a zero-order density operator of the form |g>gammagg[double-prime](etagJg)<g[double-prime]| thereby taking into account the possibility of both nonuniform magnetic sublevel populations [gammagg(etagJg)[not-equal]gammag[double-prime]g[double-prime](etagJg)] and Zeeman coherences [gammagg[double-prime](etagJg)[not-equal]0;]. For a thermalized (i. e., incoherent and isotropic) ensemble of target molecules, it is more appropriate to set gammagg[double-prime](etagJg) = deltagg[double-prime]/(2Jg+1).
  31. S. Stenholm, Foundations of Laser Spectroscopy (Wiley, New York, 1984).
  32. P. R. Berman, Phys. Rev. A 5, 927 (1972).
  33. K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications (Plenum, New York, 1996).
  34. Although it is often assumed that Palpha = 1, the summation over magnetic sublevels alone does not represent a complete resolution of the identity operator. For example, operators such as µ will couple angular momentum states that are not explicitly included in the two-level model.
  35. C. H. Greene and R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 119 (1982);
  36. J. Chem. Phys. 78, 6741 (1983).
  37. R. N. Zare, Angular Momentum: Understanding Spatial Aspects in Chemistry and Physics (Wiley, New York, 1988).
  38. A. J. Orr-Ewing and R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 315 (1994).
  39. The double summations over K and Q have been collapsed by exploiting the relationship: tr[T<sub>Q</sub><sup>(K)</sup>(etagJg)A<sub>Q[sup [prime]]</sub><sup>(K[sup [prime]])</sup>] = (−1)Q(2K+1)−1/2deltaK[prime],KdeltaQ[prime],−Q<etagJg||A(K)||etagJg>, where A<sub>Q[sup [prime]]</sub><sup>(K[sup [prime]])</sup> is any irreducible spherical tensor operator having matrix elements in the |alpha< = |etaalphaJalphaMalpha> basis. While the summations involving k1 and k2 are still performed over the range 0–2, the index K is now constrained to be less than or equal to the minimum value of either 2Jg or 4.
  40. R. C. Hilborn, Am. J. Phys. 50, 982 (1982).
  41. W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 169 (1972).
  42. A. Omont, Prog. Quantum Electron. 5, 69 (1977).
  43. C. Jungen, D. N. Malm, and A. J. Merer, Can. J. Phys. 51, 1471 (1973);
  44. K. Nishizawa, S. Kubo, A. Doi, and H. Kato, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3394 (1994);
    A. Habib, R. Gorgen, G. Brasen, R. Lange, and W. Demtröder, ibid. 101, 2752 (1994).
  45. This optical pumping expression excludes both saturation and relaxation processes and assumes rho(etagJg)[proportional]( epsilon ·µ)rho(etaiJi)( epsilon *·µ) where the initial state density operator, rho(etaiJi), corresponds to that of a thermalized system.
  46. E. J. Friedman-Hill, L. A. Rahn, and R. L. Farrow, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 4065 (1994).
  47. T. A. W. Wasserman, B. R. Johnson, and P. H. Vaccaro (work in progress).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.