Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Interaction induced phenomena in Raman spectra of mesogens
We present the results of experimental studies of light scattering in the isotropic phase of two mesogens, p-n-pentyl-p-cyanobiphenyl (5CB) and p-n-pentyl-(p-cyanophenyl)-cyclohexane (5PCH) and in the...
Next Article
Self-interaction-corrected band structure calculations for intracavity electrons in electro-sodalite
The zeolite sodalite is a crystalline compound consisting of cages. The windows connecting the cages are large enough to allow small molecules to be absorbed. The material studied here, called sodium ...

Surface kinetics of a nonlinear oxygen-induced (1 × 5) --> (1 × 1) phase transition on Ir{100}

J. Chem. Phys. 109, 9967 (1998); doi:10.1063/1.477663

Issue Date: 8 December 1998

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

T. Ali, B. Klötzer, A. V. Walker, Q. Ge, and D. A. King
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom
The interaction of oxygen with the stable Ir{100}-(1 × 5) and the metastable (1 × 1) surfaces has been studied using supersonic molecular beams in the surface temperature range 200–1080 K. Starting from the clean (1 × 5) substrate, the adsorption kinetics are dominated by the adsorbate-induced lifting of the reconstruction. The formation of (1 × 1) islands occurs between two limiting oxygen surface coverages, as confirmed by helium scattering and low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) measurements. Two distinct temperature regimes are observed in the sticking probability measurements; between 350 and 600 K the local oxygen coverage on the (1 × 1) phase is about 0.28 monolayers (ML) during the prevailing phase transformation, whereas it is 0.20 ML in the temperature range 700–900 K. This "biphasic" behavior is explained by the enhancement of surface diffusion of adsorbed oxygen atoms at sample temperatures above 650 K and has been investigated further using thermal energy atom scattering (TEAS). In contrast to the (1 × 5) phase, TEAS measurements show that random adsorption of O2 takes place on the clean metastable (1 × 1) surface. At 1080 K a pronounced flux dependence of the sticking probability is observed due to a nonlinear growth law for the formation of (1 × 1) islands, r = c(theta<sub>O</sub><sup>1 x 5</sup>)4.5. Thermal desorption measurements accompanied by LEED show that the desorption rate is strongly influenced by the (1 × 1) to (1 × 5) surface phase transition; repulsive lateral interactions exist between adsorbed oxygen atoms on the (1 × 1) substrate. We present a mathematical model which takes these effects into account in reproducing the salient features of the temperature programmed desorption (TPD) spectra. Sticking probability, TEAS, and TPD data are all consistent with a defect concentration of 0.03 ML on the clean (1 × 5) surface annealed at 1400 K. ©1998 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 23 March 1998; accepted 3 September 1998
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/109/9967/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download PDF (346 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 68.35.Rh
    Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) Solid surfaces and solidsolid interfaces Phase transitions and critical phenomena
  • 68.45.Da
    Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) Solidfluid interfaces Adsorption and desorption kinetics; evaporation and condensation
  • 82.65.My
    Physical chemistry Surface and interface chemistry Chemisorption
  • 79.20.Rf
    Electron and ion emission by liquids and solids; impact phenomena Impact phenomena (including electron spectra and sputtering) Atomic, molecular, and ion beam impact and interactions with surfaces
  • 68.35.Bs
    Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) Solid surfaces and solidsolid interfaces Surface structure and topography
  • 68.35.Fx
    Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) Solid surfaces and solidsolid interfaces Diffusion; interface formation
  • YEAR: 1998

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (32)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. A. Ignatiev, A. V. Jones, and T. N. Rhodin, Surf. Sci. 30, 573 (1972).
  2. K. Heinz, G. Schmidt, L. Hammer, and K. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 32, 6214 (1985).
  3. N. Bickel and K. Heinz, Surf. Sci. 163, 435 (1985).
  4. J. Küppers and H. Michel, Appl. Surf. Sci. 3, 179 (1979).
  5. M. A. van Hove, R. J. Koestner, P. C. Stair, J. P. Biberian, L. L. Kesmodel, I. Bartos, and G. A. Somorjai, Surf. Sci. 103, 189 (1981).
  6. T. N. Rhodin and G. Broden, Surf. Sci. 60, 466 (1976).
  7. Q. Ge, D. A. King, N. Marzari, and M. Payne, Surf. Sci. (submitted).
  8. G. Kisters, J. G. Chen, S. Lehwald, and H. Ibach, Surf. Sci. 245, 65 (1991).
  9. G. Boisvert, L. J. Lewis, M. J. Puska, and R. M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9078 (1995).
  10. T. Ali, B. Klötzer, A. V. Walker, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. (submitted).
  11. J. T. Grant, Surf. Sci. 18, 228 (1969).
  12. J. U. Mack, E. Bertel, F. P. Netzer, and D. R. Lloyd, Z. Phys. B 63, 97 (1986).
  13. C. B. Mullins, Y. Wang, and W. H. Weinberg, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7, 2125 (1989).
  14. S. Titmuss, A. Wander, and D. A. King, Chem. Rev. 96, 1291 (1996).
  15. A. Hopkinson, X. C. Guo, J. M. Bradley, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8262 (1993).
  16. A. T. Pasteur, St. J. Dixon-Warren, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 2251 (1995).
  17. M. Gruyters, T. Ali, and D. A. King, Chem. Phys. Lett. 232, 1 (1995).
  18. M. Gruyters, A. T. Pasteur, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 2941 (1996).
  19. A. V. Walker, M. Gruyters, and D. A. King, Surf. Sci. 384, L791 (1997).
  20. X. C. Guo, J. M. Bradley, A. Hopkinson, and D. A. King, Surf. Sci. 310, 163 (1994).
  21. J. M. Bradley, X. C. Guo, A. Hopkinson, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4283 (1996).
  22. A. Hopkinson, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1993.
  23. P. Gardner, R. Martin, R. Nalezinski, C. L. A. Lamont, M. J. Weaver, and A. M. Bradshaw, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 91, 3575 (1995).
  24. P. R. Norton, P. E. Bindner, and K. Griffiths, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2, 1028 (1984).
  25. D. A. King and M. G. Wells, Surf. Sci. 29, 245 (1972).
  26. J. K. Fremerey, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 1715 (1985).
  27. D. A. King and M. G. Wells, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 339, 245 (1974).
  28. A. Borg, A. M. Hilmen, and E. Bergene, Surf. Sci. 306, 10 (1994).
  29. C. Poelsema and G. Comsa, Scattering of Thermal Energy Atoms (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
  30. J. Ibanez, N. Garcia, and J. M. Rojo, Phys. Rev. B 28, 3164 (1983).
  31. Q. Ge and D. A. King (unpublished).
  32. A. Hopkinson, J. M. Bradley, X. C. Guo, and D. A. King, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1597 (1993).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.