A molecular beam study of nonlinearity in the CO-induced surface restructuring of Ir{100}
J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10996 (1998); doi:10.1063/1.477738
Issue Date: 22 December 1998
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
The kinetics of CO chemisorption on both the (1 × 5) and (1 × 1) surfaces of Ir{100}, including the CO-induced surface restructuring process, have been studied by measuring the sticking probability as a function of the surface temperature and beam flux. Due to competition between desorption from the (1 × 5) phase and growth of (1 × 1) islands, the sticking probability on the initial (1 × 5) surface is strongly flux-dependent at surface temperatures Ts in the range 480
Ts
510 K. It is shown that this is due to a strongly nonlinear dependence of the (1 × 1) growth rate on the local CO coverage on the (1 × 5) substrate, with an apparent reaction order of around 5. Desorption energies and pre-exponentials of desorption for CO from both the (1 × 1) and (1 × 5) surfaces have been determined by means of a modified lifetime measurement technique. Equilibrium coverages as well as isothermal desorption rates of CO were determined for both surface phases. The zero coverage desorption energy of CO from the (1 × 1) substrate is 196 ± 5 kJ/mol and from the (1 × 5) surface it is around 150 kJ/mol. This difference in adsorption energies is the driving force for the CO-induced (1 × 5) to (1 × 1) phase transition. TEAS data show that the local CO coverage on the growing (1 × 1) islands during the phase transformation is 0.5 ML. ©1998 American Institute of Physics.
Ts
510 K. It is shown that this is due to a strongly nonlinear dependence of the (1 × 1) growth rate on the local CO coverage on the (1 × 5) substrate, with an apparent reaction order of around 5. Desorption energies and pre-exponentials of desorption for CO from both the (1 × 1) and (1 × 5) surfaces have been determined by means of a modified lifetime measurement technique. Equilibrium coverages as well as isothermal desorption rates of CO were determined for both surface phases. The zero coverage desorption energy of CO from the (1 × 1) substrate is 196 ± 5 kJ/mol and from the (1 × 5) surface it is around 150 kJ/mol. This difference in adsorption energies is the driving force for the CO-induced (1 × 5) to (1 × 1) phase transition. TEAS data show that the local CO coverage on the growing (1 × 1) islands during the phase transformation is 0.5 ML. ©1998 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 10 August 1998; accepted 18 September 1998 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/109/10996/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
iridium,
chemisorption,
desorption,
surface structure,
surface phase transformations,
carbon compounds,
molecule-surface impact
- 68.45.Da
Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) Solid
fluid interfaces
Adsorption and desorption kinetics; evaporation and condensation
- 82.65.My
Physical chemistry Surface and interface chemistry Chemisorption - 68.35.Rh
Surfaces and interfaces; thin films and whiskers (structure and nonelectronic properties) Solid surfaces and solid
solid interfaces
Phase transitions and critical phenomena
- 79.20.Rf
Electron and ion emission by liquids and solids; impact phenomena Impact phenomena (including electron spectra and sputtering) Atomic, molecular, and ion beam impact and interactions with surfaces - YEAR: 1998
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (30)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- A. Ignatiev, A. V. Jones, and T. N. Rhodin,
Surf. Sci. 30, 573 (1972) . - K. Heinz, G. Schmidt, L. Hammer, and K. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 32, 6214 (1985).
- N. Bickel and K. Heinz,
Surf. Sci. 163, 435 (1985) . - J. Küppers and H. Michel,
Appl. Surf. Sci. 3, 179 (1979) . - M. A. van Hove, R. J. Koestner, P. C. Stair, J. P. Biberian, L. L. Kesmodel, I. Bartos, and G. A. Somorjai,
Surf. Sci. 103, 189 (1981) . - T. N. Rhodin and G. Broden,
Surf. Sci. 60, 466 (1976) . - G. Kisters, J. G. Chen, S. Lehwald, and H. Ibach,
Surf. Sci. 245, 65 (1991) . - J. T. Grant,
Surf. Sci. 18, 228 (1969) . - P. Gardner, R. Martin, R. Nalezinski, C. L. A. Lamont, M. J. Weaver, and A. M. Bradshaw,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 91, 3575 (1995) . - G. Boisvert, L. J. Lewis, M. J. Puska, and R. M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9078 (1995).
- A. Hopkinson, J. M. Bradley, X. C. Guo, and D. A. King, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1597 (1993).
- A. Hopkinson, X. C. Guo, J. M. Bradley, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8262 (1993).
- A. T. Pasteur, St. J. Dixon-Warren, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 2251 (1995).
- A. Hopkinson and D. A. King,
Chem. Phys. 177, 433 (1993) . - A. Hopkinson and D. A. King,
Faraday Discuss. 6, 255 (1993) . - M. Gruyters, T. Ali, and D. A. King,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 232, 1 (1995) . - M. Gruyters, T. Ali, and D. A. King,
J. Phys. Chem. 100, 14417 (1996) . - M. Gruyters, A. T. Pasteur, and D. A. King,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 2941 (1996) . - A. V. Walker, M. Gruyters, and D. A. King,
Surf. Sci. 384, L791 (1997) . - M. Gruyters and D. A. King,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 93, 2947 (1997) . - X. C. Guo, J. M. Bradley, A. Hopkinson, and D. A. King,
Surf. Sci. 310, 163 (1994) . - D. A. King and M. G. Wells,
Surf. Sci. 29, 245 (1972) . - J. K. Fremerey,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 3, 1715 (1985) . - Q. Ge, N. Marzouri, M. C. Payne, and D. A. King, Surf. Sci. (in press).
- Y. Y. Yeo, C. E. Wartnaby, and D. A. King,
Science 268, 1731 (1995) . - W. A. Brown, R. Kose, and D. A. King,
Chem. Rev. 98, 797 (1998) . - X. C. Guo and D. A. King,
Surf. Sci. 302, L251 (1994) . - C. Poelsema and G. Comsa, Scattering of Thermal Energy Atoms (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
- A. T. Pasteur, X. C. Guo, T. Ali, M. Gruyters, and D. A. King, J. Chem. Phys. 366, 564 (1996).
- G. Ertl,
Science 254, 1750 (1991) .








