Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Exploring the spin–orbit reactivity in the simplest chlorine atom reaction
The reaction of Cl(2P) + H2 " align="bottom"/>HCl + H serves as a benchmark for understanding the abstraction mechanism and has been the subject of numerous experimental and theoretical studies. Despi...
Next Article
Ultrafast internal conversion and photodissociation of molecules excited by femtosecond 155 nm laser pulses
The dynamics of several prototypical molecular systems after excitation with femtosecond laser pulses at 155 nm has been studied in pump–probe experiments. The vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) pump pulse...

Mass spectroscopic studies of laser ablated carbon clusters as studied by photoionization with 10.5 eV photons under high vacuum

J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6260 (1999); doi:10.1063/1.479931

Issue Date: 8 October 1999

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Tomonari Wakabayashi, Takamasa Momose, and Tadamasa Shida
Division of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Neutral carbon clusters Cn (n = 1–30) produced along with ionic clusters in laser vaporized graphite are studied under high vacuum by combined use of time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectroscopy and one photon ionization with a photon energy of 10.5 eV. The TOF mass distribution pattern shows intensification of the C4n + 2 (n >= 2) clusters more clearly than the previous work by Kaizu et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9954 (1997)] who employed the same 10.5 eV photon but photoionized the neutral clusters generated by laser vaporization of graphite in helium buffer gas. The intensification is attributed to the intrinsic stability of the C4n + 2 (n >= 2) neutral clusters, probably due to the monocyclicity. Two different line shapes of the mass spectral peak are observed for one and the same cluster size. The line shape with a tailing toward longer flight times is associated with the neutral clusters produced by relatively slow fragmentation of larger clusters (n >> 30) followed by autoionization of the fragmented clusters. The other sharp line shape is associated with prompt ionization by the 10.5 eV photon. It is concluded that only the electronically excited neutral clusters are ionized for n <= 5 whereas the clusters with n > 5 are ionized irrespective of their electronic state. ©1999 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 30 April 1999; accepted 15 July 1999
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/111/6260/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (50 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 36.40.Cg
    Studies of special atoms, molecules, and their ions; clusters Atomic and molecular clusters Electronic and magnetic properties of clusters
  • 36.40.Mr
    Studies of special atoms, molecules, and their ions; clusters Atomic and molecular clusters Spectroscopy and geometrical structure of clusters
  • 33.80.Eh
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Photon interactions with molecules Autoionization, photoionization, and photodetachment
  • 33.15.Ta
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Properties of molecules and molecular ions Mass spectra
  • 33.70.Jg
    Molecular properties and interactions with photons Intensities and shapes of molecular spectral lines and bands Line and band widths, shapes, and shifts
  • YEAR: 1999

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (26)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. A. Van Orden and R. J. Saykally, Chem. Rev. 98, 2313 (1998).
  2. W. Weltner, Jr. and R. J. Van Zee, Chem. Rev. 89, 1713 (1989).
  3. L. A. Bloomfield, M. E. Geusic, R. R. Freeman, and W. L. Brown, Chem. Phys. Lett. 121, 33 (1985).
  4. P. Pradel, P. Monchicourt, J. J. Laucagne, M. Perdrix, and G. Watel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 158, 412 (1989).
  5. T. Wakabayashi, T. Momose, T. Shida, H. Shiromaru, M. Ohara, and Y. Achiba, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 1152 (1997).
  6. E. A. Rohlfing, D. M. Cox, and A. Kaldor, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3322 (1984).
  7. K. Kaizu, M. Kohno, S. Suzuki, H. Shiromaru, T. Moriwaki, and Y. Achiba, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 9954 (1997).
  8. S. C. O'Brien, J. R. Heath, R. F. Curl, and R. E. Smalley, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 220 (1988).
  9. P. P. Radi, T. L. Bunn, P. R. Kemper, M. E. Molchan, and M. T. Bowers, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2809 (1988).
  10. E. A. Rohlfing, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 6103 (1988).
  11. R. Mitzner and E. E. B. Campbell, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 2445 (1995).
  12. P. Wutz and K. R. Lykke, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 10129 (1992).
  13. S. B. H. Bach and J. R. Eyler, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 358 (1990).
  14. R. Ramanathan, J. A. Zimmerman, and J. R. Eyler, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7838 (1993).
  15. M. Ohno, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, and W. von Niessen, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 3258 (1997).
  16. O. G. Landsverk, Phys. Rev. 56, 769 (1939).
  17. K.-W. Chang and W. R. M. Graham, J. Chem. Phys. 77, 4300 (1982).
  18. P. Freivogel, M. Grutter, D. Forney, and J. P. Maier, Chem. Phys. Lett. 249, 191 (1996).
  19. D. Forney, P. Freivogel, M. Grutter, and J. P. Maier, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 4954 (1996).
  20. J. Szczepanski and M. Vala, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 2792 (1991).
  21. K. Raghavachari and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 2191 (1987).
  22. K. S. Pitzer and E. Clementi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 81, 4477 (1959).
  23. C. Liang and H. F. Schaefer III, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 8844 (1990).
  24. J. Hutter, H. P. Lüthi, and F. Diederich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 750 (1994).
  25. J. M. L. Martin, J. El-Yazal, and J.-P. François, Chem. Phys. Lett. 242, 570 (1995).
  26. R. O. Jones, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5189 (1999).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.