Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Ultrahigh-vacuum multitechnique study of AuCN monolayers on Au(111) formed by electrochemical deposition
The two kinds of monolayers of AuCN electrodeposited on Au(111), indexed (1.15×3R–30°) and (1.41×23R–30°), have been subjected to x-ray and ultraviolet photoelectron spec...
Next Article
Characterizing nanoparticle interactions: Linking models to experiments
Self-assembly of nanoparticles involves manipulating particle interactions such that attractions are on the order of the average thermal energy in the system. If the self-assembly is to result in an o...

Hindered diffusion of colloidal particles very near to a wall: Revisited

J. Chem. Phys. 113, 1228 (2000); doi:10.1063/1.481900

Issue Date: 15 July 2000

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Michael A. Bevan and Dennis C. Prieve
Colloids, Polymers and Surfaces Program and Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Total internal reflection microscopy is a technique for monitoring changes in the distance between a single microscopic sphere and a flat plate by measuring the intensity of light scattered by the sphere when illuminated by an evanescent wave. A histogram of scattering intensities can be used to construct the potential energy profile as a function of distance relative to the most probable distance. Thus potential energies can be measured to within a fraction of kT while changes in distance can be measured to within 1 nm. An autocorrelation of the scattering intensities can be used to deduce an average diffusion coefficient of the sphere, which is found to be only a few percent of the Stokes–Einstein value, owing to the close proximity of the plate. The analysis of the intensity-autocorrelation function presented here can be used to deduce an absolute value for the most probable separation distance, without a priori knowledge of the functional form of the PE profile and in the presence of a constant background scattering intensity. This "hydrodynamic" separation distance is found to be within a few percent of the "optical" separation distance found independently by comparing the intensity at the most probable distance with the intensity of the same particle in contact with the plate. Since the particle does not need to be brought into contact with the plate, the hydrodynamic method is well suited for determining the absolute separation distance with deformable particles like liquid droplets, vesicles or biological cells. Moreover, the hydrodynamic separation can be immediately calculated without any additional experiments. However, accurate determination of the hydrodynamic separation requires an accurate value for the particle size, which must be determined independently. ©2000 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 31 January 2000; accepted 17 April 2000
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/113/1228/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (129 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.70.Dd
    Physical chemistry Disperse systems Colloids
  • 66.10.Cb
    Transport properties of condensed matter (nonelectronic) Diffusion and ionic conduction in liquids Diffusion and thermal diffusion
  • 42.25.Gy
    Optics Wave optics Edge and boundary effects; reflection and refraction
  • 07.60.Pb
    Instruments, apparatus, components, and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Optical instruments, equipment, and techniques Conventional optical microscopes
  • YEAR: 2000

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (9)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. D. C. Prieve, F. Luo, and F. Lanni, Faraday Discuss. 83, 297 (1987).
  2. D. C. Prieve, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 82, 93 (1999).
  3. N. A. Frej and D. C. Prieve, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7552 (1993).
  4. D. C. Prieve and J. Y. Walz, Appl. Opt. 32, 1629 (1993).
  5. E. S. Pagac, R. D. Tilton, and D. C. Prieve, Chem. Eng. Commun. 148, 105 (1996).
  6. A. J. Goldman, R. G. Cox, and H. Brenner, Chem. Eng. Sci. 22, 637 (1967).
  7. E. P. Honig, G. J. Roebersen, and P. H. Wiersema, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 36, 97 (1971).
  8. H. Brenner, Chem. Eng. Sci. 16, 242 (1961).
  9. M. A. Bevan, Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, 1999.

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.