Theory of sub-Doppler AutlerTownes splitting in molecules: Alignment and orientation of the angular momentum in nonpolar molecules
J. Chem. Phys. 114, 276 (2001); doi:10.1063/1.1328381
Issue Date: 1 January 2001
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Within a density matrix framework, an analytical expression for the opticaloptical double resonance (OODR) line shape for a molecule in the presence of a strong coupling laser is derived. The coupling laser is tuned to a transition between the upper level in the OODR sequence and another excited level which is not part of the OODR sequence. The pump and probe lasers are treated perturbatively, while the coupling laser is treated exactly. The line shape reveals sub-Doppler AutlerTownes (AT) splitting of the states |J,m
within the highest excited level. The splitting depends on |m|(m) for linearly (circularly) polarized coupling fields. m-state selectivity and therefore alignment and orientation of the angular momentum can be achieved by tuning the probe laser in the presence of a coupling field which is sufficiently strong to resolve the m-dependent AT splittings. m selectivity is analyzed for e and f parity 1
g levels in diatomic molecules. A method to orient nonpolar diatomics using circularly polarized lasers is proposed. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
within the highest excited level. The splitting depends on |m|(m) for linearly (circularly) polarized coupling fields. m-state selectivity and therefore alignment and orientation of the angular momentum can be achieved by tuning the probe laser in the presence of a coupling field which is sufficiently strong to resolve the m-dependent AT splittings. m selectivity is analyzed for e and f parity 1
g levels in diatomic molecules. A method to orient nonpolar diatomics using circularly polarized lasers is proposed. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 31 July 2000; accepted 4 October 2000 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/114/276/1 |
KEYWORDS and PACS
Stark effect,
angular momentum,
molecular orientation,
optical double resonance,
spectral line breadth
- 33.55.Be
Molecular properties and interactions with photons Optical activity and dichroism; magnetooptical and electrooptical spectra Zeeman and Stark effects - 33.40.+f
Molecular properties and interactions with photons Multiple resonances (including double and higher-order resonance processes, such as double nuclear magnetic resonance, electron double resonance, and microwave optical double resonance) - 33.70.Jg
Molecular properties and interactions with photons Intensities and shapes of molecular spectral lines and bands Line and band widths, shapes, and shifts - YEAR: 2001
RELATED DATABASES
PUBLICATION DATA
0021-9606 (print)
1089-7690 (online)
REFERENCES (30)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- R. D. Levine and R. B. Bernstein, Molecular Reaction Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1974).
- S. Stolte, in Atomic and Molecular Beam Methods, edited by G. Scoles (Oxford University Press, New York, 1988), Vol. 1, p. 631.
- H. J. Loesch and J. Remscheid, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 4779 (1990);
- M. Wu, R. J. Bemish, and R. E. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9447 (1994).
- V. A. Cho and R. B. Berstein,
J. Phys. Chem. 95, 8129 (1991) . - W. Kim and P. M. Felker, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1147 (1996);
- J. Sakai, C. P. Safvan, J. J. Larsen, K. M. Hilligsoe, K. Hald, and H. Stapelfeldt, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 10235 (1999).
- B. Friedrich and D. R. Herschbach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4623 (1994).
- For a review of state selection by optical methods, see K. Bergman, in Ref. 2, p. 293.
- A. F. Linskens, N. Dam, J. Reuss, and B. Sartakov, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9384 (1994).
- R. Neuhauser and H. J. Neusser, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 5362 (1995).
- S. H. Autler and C. H. Townes,
Phys. Rev. 100, 703 (1955) . - B. Girard, N. Billy, J. Vigue, and J. C. Lehmann,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 102, 168 (1983) . - B. Girard, G. O. Sitz, R. N. Zare, N. Billy, and J. Vigue, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 26 (1992).
- M. A. Quesada, A. M. F. Lau, D. H. Parker, and D. W. Chandler, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4107 (1987).
- S. Xu, G. Sha, B. Jiang, W. Sun, X. Chen, and C. Zhang, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 6122 (1994).
- W. M. Huo, K. P. Gross, and R. L. McKenzie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1012 (1985).
- A. D. Rudert, J. Martin, H. Zacharias, and J. B. Halpern,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 294, 381 (1998) . - J. Qi, G. Lazarov, X. Wang, L. Li, L. M. Narducci, A. M. Lyyra, and F. C. Spano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 288 (1999).
- A. M. Lyyra, H. Wang, T. J. Whang, and W. C. Stwalley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2724 (1991).
- M. J. O'Callaghan and A. Gallagher, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6190 (1989).
- S. Stenholm, Foundations of Laser Spectroscopy (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1984).
- In the experiment in paper I, |k2| and |k3| differ from |k1| by 17% and 11%, respectively. Full numerical integration of Eq. (13a) reveals that these differences lead to comparable changes in the linewidths as compared to the linewidth calculated using wave vectors of uniform magnitude.
- M. J. O'Callaghan and J. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6206 (1989).
- R. N. Zare, Angular Momentrum: Understanding Spatial Aspects in Chemistry and Physics (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1988).
- H. W. Kroto, Molecular Rotation Spectra (Dover, New York, 1992).
- U. Gaubatz, P. Rudecki, S. Schiemann, and K. Bergmann, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5363 (1990).
- Y. B. Band and P. S. Julienne, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3339 (1992).
- J. Martin, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Phys. Rev. A 54, 1556 (1996).
- Even for arbitrary coupling laser powers the second large terms in Eqs. (B1) and (B2) contribute little to the overall signal. In all of our calculations, these terms accounted for less than 5% to the entire signal.




6,p = n,n1)



