The heat capacity of the restricted primitive model electrolyte
J. Chem. Phys. 114, 5468 (2001); doi:10.1063/1.1359769
Issue Date: 1 April 2001
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
The constant-volume heat capacity, CV(T,
), of the restricted primitive model (RPM) electrolyte is considered in the vicinity of its critical point. It is demonstrated that, despite claims, recent simulations for finite systems do not convincingly indicate the absence of a divergence in CV(T,
)which would point to non-Ising-type criticality. The strong qualitative difference between CV for the RPM and for a Lennard-Jones fluid is shown to result from the low critical density of the former. If one considers the theoretically preferable configurational heat-capacity density, CV/V, the finite-size results for the two systems display qualitatively similar behavior on near-critical isotherms. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
), of the restricted primitive model (RPM) electrolyte is considered in the vicinity of its critical point. It is demonstrated that, despite claims, recent simulations for finite systems do not convincingly indicate the absence of a divergence in CV(T,
)which would point to non-Ising-type criticality. The strong qualitative difference between CV for the RPM and for a Lennard-Jones fluid is shown to result from the low critical density of the former. If one considers the theoretically preferable configurational heat-capacity density, CV/V, the finite-size results for the two systems display qualitatively similar behavior on near-critical isotherms. ©2001 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 13 November 2000; accepted 8 February 2001 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/114/5468/1 |
REFERENCES (19)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- M. E. Fisher,
J. Stat. Phys. 75, 1 (1994) ; - G. Stell,
78, 197 (1995) , and references therein. - M. E. Fisher,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 9103 (1996) , and references therein. - J. S. Høye and G. Stell,
J. Mol. Liq. 73-4, 453 (1997) . - M. E. Fisher and Y. Levin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3826 (1993);
- A. G. Moreira, M. M. Telo da Gama, and M. E. Fisher, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 10058 (1999), and references therein;
- J. M. Caillol, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2161 (1994).
- G. Orkoulas and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 1452 (1994);
- J. C. Shelley and G. N. Patey, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8299 (1993).
- J. M. Caillol, D. Levesque, and J. J. Weis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4039 (1996).
- J. Valleau and G. Torrie, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 5169 (1998).
- Q. Yan and J. J. de Pablo, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 9509 (1999).
- N. B. Wilding and A. D. Bruce,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 4, 3087 (1992) . - R. J. Baxter, Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Academic, London, 1982).
- E. Luijten, Interaction Range, Universality and the Upper Critical Dimension (Delft University Press, Delft, 1997).
- G. Orkoulas, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. E 61, 5930 (2000).
- A. Z. Panagiotopoulos and S. K. Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2981 (1999).
- E. Luijten, M. E. Fisher, and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos (unpublished).
- M. E. Fisher,
Phys. Rev. 136, A1599 (1964) . - See, e.g., M. E. Fisher,
Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 597 (1974) ;
70, 653 (1998).








