Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Continuous transition between Brillouin–Wigner and Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory, generalized Bloch equation, and Hilbert space multireference coupled cluster
A continuous transition between the Rayleigh–Schrödinger and Brillouin–Wigner perturbation theories is constructed and the Bloch equation for the corresponding wave operator is derived....
Next Article
Electronic structures, vibrational spectra, and revised assignment of aniline and its radical cation: Theoretical study
Comprehensive studies of the molecular and electronic structures, vibrational frequencies, and infrared and Raman intensities of the aniline radical cation, C6H5NH2+" align="middle"/> have been perfor...

Near-infrared spectroscopy of H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup> above the barrier to linearity

J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10890 (2003); doi:10.1063/1.1575737

Issue Date: 22 June 2003

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Jennifer L. Gottfried, Benjamin J. McCall, and Takeshi Oka
Department of Chemistry, Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, the Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
The first H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup> transitions above the barrier to linearity have been observed in absorption in the near infrared using a highly sensitive dual-beam, double-modulation technique with bidirectional optical multipassing. A total of 22 rovibrational transitions of H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup> have been detected and assigned to the fourth and fifth overtone and combination bands (5nu<sub>2</sub><sup>1</sup>, 5nu<sub>2</sub><sup>5</sup>, 2nu1 + 2nu<sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup>, 3nu1 + nu<sub>2</sub><sup>1</sup>, nu1 + 4nu<sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup>, 2nu1 + 3nu<sub>2</sub><sup>1</sup>, and 6nu<sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup>). These transitions, which are more than 4600 times weaker than the fundamental band, probe energy levels above 10 000 cm–1, the regime in which H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup> has enough energy to sample linear configurations. Experimentally determined energy levels above the barrier to linearity provide a critical test of ab initio calculations in this challenging regime. The comparison between experimental energy levels and theoretical energy levels from ab initio calculations in which the adiabatic and relativistic corrections are incorporated reveals the extent of higher-order effects such as nonadiabatic and radiative corrections. We compare our results with several recent theoretical calculations.©2003 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 19 March 2003; accepted 28 March 2003
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/118/10890/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (462 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 33.20.Ea
    Infrared molecular spectra
  • 33.20.Vq
    Vibration-rotation analysis (molecular spectra)
  • 31.15.Ar
    Ab initio calculations (atoms and molecules)
  • YEAR: 2003

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (80)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. T. Oka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 531 (1980).
  2. L. Trafton, D. F. Lester, and K. L. Thompson, Astrophys. J. Lett. 343, L73 (1989).
  3. P. Drossart, J. P. Maillard, J. Caldwell et al., Nature (London) 340, 539 (1989).
  4. T. R. Geballe and T. Oka, Nature (London) 384, 334 (1996).
  5. B. J. McCall, T. R. Geballe, K. H. Hinkle, and T. Oka, Science 279, 1910 (1998).
  6. T. Oka, in Molecular Ions: Spectroscopy, Structure, and Chemistry, edited by T. A. Miller and V. E. Bondybey (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983), p. 73.
  7. T. Oka, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64, 1141 (1992).
  8. S. Miller and J. Tennyson, Chem. Soc. Rev. 21, 281 (1992).
  9. J. Tennyson and S. Miller, Contemp. Phys. 35, 105 (1994).
  10. A. Dalgarno, Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 32, 57 (1994).
  11. I. R. McNab, Adv. Chem. Phys. 89, 1 (1995).
  12. J. Tennyson, Rep. Prog. Phys. 57, 421 (1995).
  13. B. J. McCall, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 358, 2385 (2000).
  14. C. M. Lindsay and B. J. McCall, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 210, 60 (2001).
  15. J. Tennyson and S. Miller, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 57, 661 (2001).
  16. B. J. McCall, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, 2001, available online at http://fermi.uchicago.edu/publications/archive/mccallthesis.pdf
  17. C. S. Gudeman, M. H. Begemann, J. Pfaff, and R. J. Saykally, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 727 (1983).
  18. G. C. Bjorklund, Opt. Lett. 5, 15 (1980).
  19. J. P. Maillard and E. Lellouch (private communication).
  20. T. Oka, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 48, 503 (1973).
  21. J. T. Hougen, J. Chem. Phys. 37, 1433 (1962).
  22. J. B. Anderson, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 3702 (1992).
  23. C. A. Coulson, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 31, 244 (1935).
  24. G. D. Carney and R. N. Porter, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 4251 (1974).
  25. G. D. Carney and R. N. Porter, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 3547 (1976).
  26. W. Meyer, P. Botschwina, and P. Burton, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 891 (1986).
  27. S. Miller and J. Tennyson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 126, 183 (1987).
  28. S. Miller and J. Tennyson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 128, 530 (1988).
  29. S. Miller and J. Tennyson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 136, 223 (1989).
  30. B. T. Sutcliffe and J. Tennyson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 83, 1663 (1987).
  31. M. G. Bawendi, B. D. Rehfuss, and T. Oka, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 6200 (1990).
  32. W. A. Majewski, P. A. Feldman, J. K. G. Watson, S. Miller, and J. Tennyson, Astrophys. J. Lett. 347, L51 (1989).
  33. L.-W. Xu, M. Rösslein, C. M. Gabrys, and T. Oka, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 153, 726 (1992).
  34. B. M. Dinelli, S. Miller, and J. Tennyson, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 163, 71 (1994).
  35. G. C. Lie and D. Frye, J. Chem. Phys. 96, 6784 (1992).
  36. J. K. G. Watson, Can. J. Phys. 72, 702 (1994).
  37. J. K. G. Watson, Chem. Phys. 190, 291 (1995).
  38. J. K. G. Watson (private communication).
  39. R. Röhse, W. Kutzelnigg, R. Jaquet, and W. Klopper, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 2231 (1994).
  40. B. M. Dinelli, O. L. Polyansky, and J. Tennyson, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10433 (1995).
  41. L. Neale, S. Miller, and J. Tennyson, Astrophys. J. 464, 516 (1996).
  42. B. M. Dinelli, C. R. Le Sueur, J. Tennyson, and R. D. Amos, Chem. Phys. Lett. 232, 295 (1995).
  43. W. Cencek, J. Rychlewski, R. Jaquet, and W. Kutzelnigg, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2831 (1998).
  44. R. Jaquet, W. Cencek, W. Kutzelnigg, and J. Rychlewski, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2837 (1998).
  45. O. L. Polyansky and J. Tennyson, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 5056 (1999).
  46. R. Jaquet, Chem. Phys. Lett. 302, 27 (1999).
  47. R. Jaquet, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 58, 691 (2002).
  48. P. Schiffels, A. Alijah, and J. Hinze, Mol. Phys. 101, 175 (2003).
  49. P. Schiffels, A. Alijah, and J. Hinze, Mol. Phys. 101, 189 (2003).
  50. A. Aguado, O. Roncero, C. Tablero, C. Sanz, and M. Paniagua, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 1240 (2000).
  51. M. A. Kostin, O. L. Polyansky, and J. Tennyson, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7564 (2002).
  52. R. M. Whitnell and J. C. Light, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1774 (1989).
  53. B. R. Johnson, J. Chem. Phys. 79, 1916 (1983).
  54. F. T. Smith, J. Math. Phys. 3, 735 (1962).
  55. R. C. Whitten and F. T. Smith, J. Math. Phys. 9, 1103 (1968).
  56. P. Bartlett and B. J. Howard, Mol. Phys. 70, 1001 (1990).
  57. S. Carter and W. Meyer, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 8902 (1990).
  58. S. Carter and W. Meyer, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 2104 (1994).
  59. L. Wolniewicz and J. Hinze, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 9817 (1994).
  60. A. Alijah, J. Hinze, and L. Wolniewicz, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 99, 251 (1995).
  61. B. J. McCall and T. Oka, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 3104 (2000).
  62. R. Wang, Y. Chen, P. Cai, J. Lu, Z. Bi, X. Yang, and L. Ma, Chem. Phys. Lett. 307, 339 (1999).
  63. M. Luo, Z. Bi, P. Cai, R. Wang, X. Yang, Y. Chen, and L. Ma, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 2691 (2001).
  64. C. M. Lindsay, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, 2002, available online at http://fermi.uchicago.edu/publications/archive/lindsaythesis.pdf
  65. M. Gehrtz, G. C. Bjorklund, and E. A. Whittaker, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1510 (1985).
  66. G. C. Bjorklund, M. D. Levenson, W. Lenth, and C. Ortiz, Appl. Phys. B: Photophys. Laser Chem. 32, 145 (1983).
  67. N. C. Wong and J. L. Hall, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 1527 (1985).
  68. J. A. Silver and A. C. Stanton, Appl. Opt. 27, 1914 (1988).
  69. E. A. Whittaker, C. M. Shum, H. Grebel, and H. Lotem, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 1253 (1988).
  70. J. L. Hall, L. Hollberg, T. Baer, and H. G. Robinson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 680 (1981).
  71. W. E. Sinclair, D. Pfluger, H. Linnartz, and J. P. Maier, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 296 (1999).
  72. A. Alijah (private communication).
  73. J. K. G. Watson (private communication).
  74. T. Oka and Y. Morino, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 6, 472 (1961).
  75. J. Oddershede and J. R. Sabin, Chem. Phys. 122, 291 (1988).
  76. P. R. Bunker and R. E. Moss, Mol. Phys. 33, 417 (1977).
  77. P. R. Bunker and R. E. Moss, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 80, 217 (1980).
  78. D. W. Schwenke, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2352 (2001).
  79. J. Tennyson, M. A. Kostin, H. Y. Mussa, O. L. Polyansky, and R. Prosmiti, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 358, 2419 (2000).
  80. A. Carrington, J. Buttenshaw, and R. Kennedy, Mol. Phys. 45, 753 (1982).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.