Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
The dynamics of conformational isomerization in flexible biomolecules. I. Hole-filling spectroscopy of N-acetyl tryptophan methyl amide and N-acetyl tryptophan amide
The conformational isomerization dynamics of N-acetyl tryptophan methyl amide (NATMA) and N-acetyl tryptophan amide (NATA) have been studied using the methods of IR-UV hole-filling spectroscopy (HFS) ...
Next Article
Combined electronic and nuclear dynamics in a simple model system. II. Spectroscopic transitions
We investigate the correlated electronic and nuclear motion in a model system as proposed by Shin and Metiu [J. Chem. Phys. 102, 9285 (1995)]. The quantum dynamics is studied during laser induced elec...

The dynamics of conformational isomerization in flexible biomolecules. II. Simulating isomerizations in a supersonic free jet with master equation dynamics

J. Chem. Phys. 120, 148 (2004); doi:10.1063/1.1626541

Issue Date: 1 January 2004

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

David A. Evans and David J. Wales
University Chemical Laboratories, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom

Brian C. Dian and Timothy S. Zwier
Department of Chemistry, 560 Oval Drive, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2084
Infrared-induced conformational isomerization of N-acetyl-tryptophan methyl amide is studied theoretically using a microcanonical Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus description of the rates on potential energy surfaces calculated using the AMBER and OPLS-AA force fields. The results are compared with the experimental data from Dian et al. in the preceding paper [J. Chem. Phys. 120, 133 (2004)]. An exhaustive search of the potential energy surfaces locates all minima and transition states on these surfaces. A simple model is proposed for the vibrational cooling, and an appropriate cooling rate is chosen as the standard conditions for the master equation simulations by comparison with experiment. The two potential energy surfaces differ in the relative energies of minima and the heights of key transition states, leading to differences in the dominant pathways and rates of conformational isomerization. The predicted quantum yields depend sensitively on the cooling rate, varying from the slow cooling limit in which equilibrium populations are achieved to the fast quenching limit in which conformational isomerization is shut off. The excitation energy is varied from 5 to 20 kcal mol–1. At the lowest energies, isomerization is completely quenched, while at the highest energies, equilibrium conditions are achieved. In between these extremes, the quantum yields are sensitive to the excitation energy, and can be used to locate the rate-limiting barriers to isomerization. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 7 August 2003; accepted 26 September 2003
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/120/148/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$28)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (280 kB) View Cart

EDITORIALLY RELATED

  1. The dynamics of conformational isomerization in flexible biomolecules. I. Hole-filling spectroscopy of N-acetyl tryptophan methyl amide and N-acetyl tryptophan amide
    Brian C. Dian et al.
    J. Chem. Phys. 120, 133 (2004)

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 82.30.Qt
    Isomerization and rearrangement in chemical reactions
  • 87.15.He
    Biomolecular dynamics and conformational changes
  • 82.20.Kh
    Potential energy surfaces for chemical reactions
  • YEAR: 2004

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (22)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. B. C. Dian, A. Longarte, P. R. Winter, and T. S. Zwier, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 133 (2004), preceding paper.
  2. J. N. Murrell and K. J. Laidler, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.64, 371 (1968).
  3. D. J. Wales, J. P. K. Doye, M. A. Miller, P. N. Mortenson, and T. R. Walsh, Adv. Chem. Phys. 115, 1 (2000).
  4. D. J. Wales, Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003).
  5. T. Baer and W. L. Hase, Unimolecular Reaction Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1996).
  6. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. W. Merz, Jr., D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5179 (1995).
  7. P. Kollman, R. Dixon, W. Cornell, T. Fox, C. Chipot, and A. Pohorille, Comput. Sim. Biomol. Syst.3, 83 (1997).
  8. W. L. Jorgensen, D. S. Maxwell, and J. Tirado-Rives, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11225 (1996).
  9. M. A. Miller, J. P. K. Doye, and D. J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 328 (1999).
  10. P. N. Mortenson and D. J. Wales, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6443 (2001).
  11. C. J. Cerjan and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 75, 2800 (1981).
  12. D. J. Wales and T. R. Walsh, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 6957 (1996).
  13. O. M. Becker and M. Karplus, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 1495 (1997).
  14. B. C. Dian, A. Longarte, and T. S. Zwier, Science 296, 2369 (2002).
  15. B. C. Dian, A. Longarte, S. Mercier, D. A. Evans, D. J. Wales, and T. S. Zwier, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 10688 (2002).
  16. T. Beyer and D. Swinehart, Commun. ACM 16, 379 (1973).
  17. R. Bulirsch and J. Stoer, Introduction to Numerical Analysis (Springer, New York, 1991).
  18. J. R. Barker, J. Phys. Chem. 88, 11 (1984).
  19. M. Damm, F. Deckert, and J. Troe, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 2005 (1991).
  20. D. M. Lubman, C. T. Rettner, and R. N. Zare, J. Phys. Chem. 86, 1129 (1982).
  21. H. Ashkenas and F. S. Sherman, in Rarefield Gas Dynamics, 4th Symposium, edited by J. H. de Leeuw (Academic, New York, 1966), Vol. II.
  22. X. Yu and D. M. Leitner, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 1698 (2003).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.