Beadbead interaction parameters in dissipative particle dynamics: Relation to bead-size, solubility parameter, and surface tension
J. Chem. Phys. 120, 1594 (2004); doi:10.1063/1.1630294
Issue Date: 15 January 2004
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) is a mesoscale modeling method for simulating equilibrium and dynamical properties of polymers in solution. The basic idea has been around for several decades in the form of bead-spring models. A few years ago, Groot and Warren [J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4423 (1997)] established an important link between DPD and the FloryHuggins
-parameter theory for polymer solutions. We revisit the GrootWarren theory and investigate the DPD interaction parameters as a function of bead size. In particular, we show a consistent scheme of computing the interfacial tension in a segregated binary mixture. Results for three systems chosen for illustration are in excellent agreement with experimental results. This opens the door for determining DPD interactions using interfacial tension as a fitting parameter. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
-parameter theory for polymer solutions. We revisit the GrootWarren theory and investigate the DPD interaction parameters as a function of bead size. In particular, we show a consistent scheme of computing the interfacial tension in a segregated binary mixture. Results for three systems chosen for illustration are in excellent agreement with experimental results. This opens the door for determining DPD interactions using interfacial tension as a fitting parameter. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
| History: | Received 28 July 2003; accepted 7 October 2003 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/120/1594/1 |
REFERENCES (33)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- P. J. Hoogerbruge and J. M. V. A. Koelman,
Europhys. Lett. 19, 155 (1992) ; - J. M. V. A. Koelman and P. J. Hoogerbruge,
ibid. 21, 363 (1993) . - Y. Kong, C. W. Manke, W. G. Madden, and A. G. Schlijper,
Int. J. Thermophys. 15, 1093 (1994) ; - A. G. Schlijper, P. J. Hoogerbruge, and C. W. Manke,
J. Rheol. 39, 567 (1995) . - P. Espa
ol and P. Warren,
Europhys. Lett. 30, 191 (1995) . - R. D. Groot and P. B. Warren, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4423 (1997).
- P. J. Flory, Principles of Polymer Chemistry (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1953).
- J. H. Hildebrand and R. L. Scott, The Solubility of Non-Electrolytes (Reinhold, New York, 1949).
- F. Case and J. D. Honeycutt,
Trends Polym. Sci. 2, 259 (1994) . - M. Doi, Introduction to Polymer Physics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1996), Chap. 2.
- J. M. Haile, Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Elementary Methods (Wiley, New York, 1992), Appendix B.
- It should be noted that for small
(
1) the value of
is not a constant (as can be guessed from Table V itself), and in fact is strongly -dependent. Therefore, the present theory does not apply to gases.
- If this is violated, e.g., if pA>pB, then A will compress B until the pressures become equal. But that would imply that at equilibrium
A<
B, which is a contradiction.
- This result can be generalized to mixing species A and B by hypothesizing a third species C, which does not mix with either A or B. By previous arguments, that would imply
AA =
CC and
BB =
CC, which implies
AA =
BB.
-
critical is the value of
at the critical point separating homogeneous and segregated mixtures, and is given by4
critical = 1/2(1/+ 1/
)2 for a binary mixture of polymers with chain lengths NA and NB, respectively. In particular, for a monomer-monomer mixture,
critical = 2. - C. M. Wijmans, B. Smit, and R. D. Groot, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 7644 (2001).
- Groot and Rabone16 considered the possibility of linear scaling of
AA as a function of bead-size. However, that leads to an increasing surface tension as a function of bead-size, as shown in Sec. IV of the text.
- R. D. Groot and K. L. Rabone,
Biophys. J. 81, 725 (2001) . - Amorphous cell is a module in the Materials Studio Modeling software package from Accelrys Inc. See, http://www.accelrys.com/mstudio/ms_modeling/amorphous.html
- H. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 7338 (1998).
- Discover is a module in the Materials Studio Modeling software package from Accelrys Inc. See, http://www.accelrys.com/mstudio/ms_modeling/discover.html
- J. E. Mark, editor, Physical Properties of Polymer Handbook (AIP, New York, 1996).
- A. F. M. Barton, editor, Handbook of Solubility Parameters (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1983).
- C. F. Fan, B. D. Olafson, M. Blanco, and S. L. Hsu,
Macromolecules 25, 3667 (1992) . - S. J. Mumby and P. Sher,
Macromolecules 27, 689 (1994) . - D. Rigby and R. J. Roe, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 5280 (1988).
- B. E. Eichinger, D. Rigby, and J. Stein,
Polymer 43, 599 (2002) . - We assume the same WSG fit for
AA = 50 and
AA = 75 as for
AA = 25. See Fig. 3 of Ref. 14.
- See Accelrys page: http://www.accelrys.com/mstudio/ms_modeling/dpd.html
- For DPD simulations with polymers, an extra "spring-interaction" term is added between connected beads. A form proportional to the bead-bead separation was used in our simulations of Table V4 with a spring-constant of 4.0.
- W. Kuhn,
Kolloid-Z. 76, 258 (1936) . - G. Strobl, The Physics of Polymers, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1997).
- P. J. Flory,
Macromolecules 7, 381 (1974) . - For larger values of
, one needs to use smaller time-steps of integration in order to avoid numerical instability. Thus for
= 25, one can safely use a time-step of 0.05, while for
= 300 one needs to reduce the time-step to ~0.02 (in DPD units).
- The values of (
+ /2
![[partial-derivative]](http://scitation.aip.org/stockgif2/part.gif)
/![[partial-derivative]](http://scitation.aip.org/stockgif2/part.gif)
) were estimated by fitting the following functional form:
() =
1 +
2eat
= 25.




-amyloid



