Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Density-induced coupling effects on the dispersivity of a flexible chain particle
A model is introduced to investigate the transport properties of an inhomogeneously dense flexible chain particle. The specific model used is a sedimenting non-neutrally buoyant inhomogenously weighte...
Next Article
Prediction of membrane protein structures by replica-exchange Monte Carlo simulations: Case of two helices
We test our prediction method of membrane protein structures with glycophorin A transmembrane dimer and analyze the predicted structures in detail. Our method consists of two parts. In the first part,...

Orientational and interaction induced dynamics in the isotropic phase of a liquid crystal: Polarization resolved ultrafast optical Kerr effect spectroscopy

J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10828 (2004); doi:10.1063/1.1737293

Issue Date: 8 June 2004

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Neil T. Hunt and Stephen R. Meech
School of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom
The ultrafast dynamics of the isotropic phase of a liquid crystal 4[prime]-pentyl-4-p-biphenylcarbonitrile (5CB) have been investigated using polarization resolved optical Kerr effect spectroscopy. Measurements were made as a function of both temperature and dilution in nonpolar solvents. To separate single molecule and interaction induced components to the relaxation of the induced birefringence, measurements of both the anisotropic and isotropic response were made. The isotropic response was found to be dominated by a damped low-frequency mode of intramolecular origin. There is a minor additional component assigned to an interaction induced contribution. There is at most an extremely weak isotropic signal beyond 1 ps, showing that the picosecond time scale dynamics of 5CB are dominated by orientational relaxation. The isotropic response is independent of temperature in the range studied (0.2–50 K above the nematic to isotropic phase-transition temperature). The anisotropic response exhibits relaxation dynamics on time scales spanning subpicosecond to several hundred picoseconds and beyond. The fastest components are dominated by a librational response, but there are smaller contributions from three low-frequency intramolecular modes, and a contribution from interaction induced effects. The low-frequency spectral density extracted from these data are independent of temperature in the range studied, 0.2–30 K above the phase-transition temperature, but shift to lower frequency on dilution in alkane solvents. In neat 5CB the picosecond time scale orientational dynamics are dominated by temperature-independent reorientation within the pseudonematic domains, while in solution these are disrupted, and the orientational response becomes faster and temperature dependent. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 19 January 2004; accepted 11 March 2004
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/120/10828/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (128 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 61.30.Eb
    Experimental determinations of smectic, nematic, cholesteric, and other structures
  • 61.30.Gd
    Orientational order of liquid crystals in electric and magnetic fields
  • 64.70.Md
    Transitions in liquid crystals
  • 33.55.-b
    Optical activity and dichroism; magnetooptical and electrooptical spectra (molecules)
  • 78.20.Fm
    Birefringence (bulk materials/thin films)
  • 78.47.+p
    Time-resolved optical spectroscopies and other ultrafast optical measurements in condensed matter
  • YEAR: 2004

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (55)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. D. Kivelson and P. A. Madden, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31, 523 (1980).
  2. P. J. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamic Light Scattering (Wiley, New York, 1976).
  3. N. A. Smith and S. R. Meech, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 21, 75 (2002).
  4. S. Kinoshita, Y. Kai, T. Ariyoshi, and Y. Shimada, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10, 1229 (1996).
  5. W. T. Lotshaw, D. McMorrow, N. Thantu, J. S. Melinger, and R. Kitchenham, J. Raman Spectrosc. 26, 571 (1995).
  6. S. Kinoshita, Y. Kai, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(1), 148 (1995).
  7. P. Cong, J. D. Simon, and C. Y. She, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 962 (1996).
  8. M. Khalil, O. Golonzka, N. Demirdoven, C. J. Fecko, and A. Tokmakoff, Chem. Phys. Lett. 321, 231 (2000).
  9. C. J. Fecko, J. D. Eaves, and A. Tokmakoff, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 1139 (2002).
  10. J. D. Eaves, C. J. Fecko, A. L. Stevens, P. Peng, and A. Tokmakoff, Chem. Phys. Lett. 376, 20 (2003).
  11. G. Giraud, J. Karolin, and K. Wynne, Biophys. J. 85, 1903 (2003).
  12. H. Shirota and E. W. Castner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 12877 (2001).
  13. N. T. Hunt, A. A. Jaye, A. Hellman, and S. R. Meech, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 100 (2004).
  14. N. T. Hunt, A. A. Jaye, and S. R. Meech, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 3405 (2003).
  15. N. T. Hunt, A. A. Jaye, and S. R. Meech, Chem. Phys. Lett. 371, 304 (2003).
  16. H. Cang, H. Li, and M. D. Fayer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 366, 82 (2002).
  17. H. Cang, J. Li, V. N. Novikov, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 10421 (2003).
  18. S. D. Gottke, H. Cang, B. Bagchi, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6339 (2002).
  19. S. D. Gottke, D. D. Brace, H. Cang, B. Bagchi, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 360 (2002).
  20. J. J. Stankus, R. Torre, C. D. Marshall, S. R. Greenfield, A. Sengupta, A. Tokmakoff, and M. D. Fayer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 194, 213 (1992).
  21. J. J. Stankus, R. Torre, and M. D. Fayer, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 9478 (1993).
  22. B. R. Hyun and E. L. Quitevis, Chem. Phys. Lett. 373, 526 (2003).
  23. B. R. Hyun and E. L. Quitevis, Chem. Phys. Lett. 370, 725 (2003).
  24. D. D. Brace, S. D. Gottke, H. Cang, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1598 (2002).
  25. H. Cang, V. N. Novikov, and M. D. Fayer, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 2800 (2003).
  26. P. G. de Gennes, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon, Oxford, 1974).
  27. K. Kiyohara, K. Ohta, and Y. Shimizu, Mol. Phys. 100, 2423 (2002).
  28. S. Y. Yakovenko, A. A. Muravski, F. Eikelshulte, and A. J. Geiger, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10766 (1996).
  29. S. Y. Yakovenko and J. J. Pelzl, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 9950 (1998).
  30. M. P. Allen and M. A. Warren, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1291 (1997).
  31. S. Mukamel, Principles of Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).
  32. R. W. Hellwarth, Prog. Quantum Electron. 5, 1 (1977).
  33. H. Stassen and W. A. Steele, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4408 (1995).
  34. D. Frenkel and J. P. McTague, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 2801 (1980).
  35. B. M. Ladanyi and Y. Q. Liang, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 6325 (1995).
  36. M. D. Levenson and S. Kano, Introduction to Nonlinear Laser Spectroscopy (Academic, New York, 1988).
  37. A. Tokmakoff, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 1 (1996).
  38. M. Matsuo and T. Tahara, Chem. Phys. Lett. 264, 636 (1997).
  39. Y. J. Chang and E. W. Castner, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 7289 (1993).
  40. Y. J. Chang and E. W. Castner, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3330 (1996).
  41. N. A. Smith and S. R. Meech, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 4223 (2000).
  42. M. Neelakandan, D. Pant, and E. L. Quitevis, J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 2936 (1997).
  43. K. Kamada, M. Ueda, K. Ohta, Y. Wang, K. Ushida, and Y. Tominaga, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10948 (1998).
  44. J. A. Bucaro and T. A. Litovitz, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 3846 (1971).
  45. T. I. C. Jansen, M. Swart, L. Jensen, P. T. van Duijnen, J. G. Snijders, and K. Duppen, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 3277 (2002).
  46. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
  47. G. Giraud, C. M. Gordon, I. R. Dunkin, and K. Wynne, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 464 (2003).
  48. D. McMorrow, N. Thantu, J. S. Melinger, S. K. Kim, and W. T. Lotshaw, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 10389 (1996).
  49. Y. J. Chang and E. W. Castner, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 113 (1993).
  50. D. McMorrow, N. Thantu, V. Kleiman, J. S. Melinger, and W. T. Lotshaw, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 7960 (2001).
  51. T. Steffen, J. T. Fourkas, and K. Duppen, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 7364 (1996).
  52. K. Krebs, S. Sandroni, and G. Zerbi, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 3502 (1964).
  53. T. I. C. Jansen, A. Pugzlys, G. D. Cringus, J. G. Snijders, and K. Duppen, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9383 (2002).
  54. R. M. Barrett and D. Steele, J. Mol. Struct. 11, 105 (1972);
  55. M. B. Johnson, L. M. Hertz, A. L. T. Khan, A. Kohler, A. G. Davies, and E. H. Linfield, Chem. Phys. Lett. 377, 256 (2003).
  56. K. Kiyohara, K. Ohta, and Y. Shimizu, Mol. Phys. 100(15), 2423 (2002).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.