Excitation energies from time-dependent density-functional theory beyond the adiabatic approximation
J. Chem. Phys. 121, 28 (2004); doi:10.1063/1.1756865
Issue Date: 1 July 2004
You are not logged in to this journal. Log in
Time-dependent density-functional theory in the adiabatic approximation has been very successful for calculating excitation energies in molecular systems. This paper studies nonadiabatic effects for excitation energies, using the currentdensity functional of Vignale and Kohn [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2037 (1996)]. We derive a general analytic expression for nonadiabatic corrections to excitation energies of finite systems and calculate singlet s
s and s
p excitations of closed-shell atoms. The approach works well for s
s excitations, giving a small improvement over the adiabatic local-density approximation, but tends to overcorrect s
p excitations. We find that the observed problems with the nonadiabatic correction have two main sources: (1) the currents associated with the s
p excitations are highly nonuniform and, in particular, change direction between atomic shells, (2) the so-called exchange-correlation kernels of the homogeneous electron gas, f
and f
, are incompletely known, in particular in the high-density atomic core regions. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
s and s
p excitations of closed-shell atoms. The approach works well for s
s excitations, giving a small improvement over the adiabatic local-density approximation, but tends to overcorrect s
p excitations. We find that the observed problems with the nonadiabatic correction have two main sources: (1) the currents associated with the s
p excitations are highly nonuniform and, in particular, change direction between atomic shells, (2) the so-called exchange-correlation kernels of the homogeneous electron gas, f| History: | Received 8 March 2004; accepted 8 April 2004 |
| Permalink: |
http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/121/28/1 |
REFERENCES (32)
For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
- E. Runge and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984).
- E. K. U. Gross, J. F. Dobson, and M. Petersilka, in Density Functional Theory II, Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 181 (Springer, Berlin, 1996), p. 81.
- M. E. Casida, in Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods, edited by D. P. Chong (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 155.
- M. Petersilka, U. J. Gossmann, and E. K. U. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1212 (1996).
- H. Appel, E. K. U. Gross, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 043005 (2003).
- F. Furche and R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 7433 (2002).
- H. M. Vaswani, C. P. Hsu, M. Head-Gordon, and G. R. Fleming,
J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 7940 (2003) . - M. A. L. Marques, X. Lopez, D. Varsano, A. Castro, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 258101 (2003).
- N. T. Maitra, K. Burke, H. Appel, E. K. U. Gross, and R. van Leeuwen, in Reviews in Modern Quantum Chemistry: A Celebration of the Contributions of R. G. Parr, edited by K. D. Sen, (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).
- A. Zangwill and P. Soven, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1561 (1980).
- E. K. U. Gross and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2850 (1985).
- J. F. Dobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2244 (1994).
- G. Vignale and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2037 (1996).
- G. Vignale, C. A. Ullrich, and S. Conti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4878 (1997).
- C. A. Ullrich and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 65, 245102 (2002).
- C. A. Ullrich and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 58, 15756 (1998).
- C. A. Ullrich and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037402 (2001).
- I. D'Amico and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 59, 7876 (1999).
- M. van Faassen, P. L. de Boeij, R. van Leeuwen, J. A. Berger, and J. G. Snijders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 186401 (2002).
- M. van Faassen, P. L. de Boeij, R. van Leeuwen, J. A. Berger, and J. G. Snijders, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 1044 (2003).
- O. V. Gritsenko, S. J. A. van Gisbergen, A. Görling, and E. J. Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8478 (2000).
- R. Nifosi, S. Conti, and M. P. Tosi, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12758 (1998).
- Z. Qian and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 65, 235121 (2002).
- A generalization to degenerate KS orbitals is formally straightforward but unnecessary for s
p excitations in closed-shell atoms: due to symmetry, one obtains the same results from the nondegenerate formalism with any one of the p orbitals. - L. D. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Mechanics of Fluids, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 6 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1987).
- J. F. Dobson, G. H. Harris, and A. J. O'Connor,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 6461 (1990) . - S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair,
Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980) . - S. Conti and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B 60, 7966 (1999).
- C. E. Moore, Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. (U.S., Natl. Bur. Stand.) 35, Vol. IIII (1971).
- S. Bashkin and J. D. Stoner, Atomic Energy Levels and Grotrian Diagrams (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).
- M. van Faassen and P. L. de Boeij, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 8353 (2004).
- I. Vasiliev, S. Ö
üt, and J. R. Chelikowsly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1919 (1999).








