Journal of Chemical Physics
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Search:
   
 
 
 
Previous Article
Molecular origin of demixing, prior to crystallization, of atactic polypropylene/isotactic polypropylene blends upon cooling from the melt
An amorphous 50/50 atactic polypropylene (aPP)/isotactic polypropylene (iPP) mixture at 125 °C was simulated using a second nearest neighbor diamond lattice and a three states rotational isometric...
Next Article
On the behavior of the volume viscosity of atom-molecule mixtures
The behavior of the volume viscosity in atom-molecule gas mixtures is investigated in the framework of the first-order Enskog–Chapman expansion when the internal-energy relaxation cross section f...

Effect of branching and confinement on star-branched polymeric systems

J. Chem. Phys. 121, 8652 (2004); doi:10.1063/1.1793150

Issue Date: 1 November 2004

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Johnny R. Maury-Evertsz and L. Antonio Estévez
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, P.O. Box 9046, Puerto Rico 00681-9046

Gustavo E. López
Department of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, P.O. Box 9019, Puerto Rico 00681-9019
The effect of confinement, number of branches (functionality), and size of the molecules on various properties as a function of temperature of star-branched polymers confined between two walls was studied using Monte Carlo simulations with the parallel tempering technique. The coil-to-globule transition and the liquidlike to solidlike transition, similar to those observed for linear chains, were characterized in all systems by changes in the heat capacity, internal energy, and radius of gyration. The transitions were also characterized by the most probable isomeric structure at a given temperature. The radius of gyration of the star polymers was smaller than the values of linear chains when the number of arms f increased. For star chains with more than f = 5 arms the values of the radius of gyration, and therefore the size of the molecules, were similar for every condition of confinement studied, especially at higher temperatures. As confinement was increased, the difference in the radius of gyration of linear chains and star polymers became even larger. The coil-to-globule transition temperatures shifted to higher temperatures as the size of the chains and the number of arms in a molecule were increased. Effects of confinement were higher on the properties of the system at the smallest separations (less than twice the monomer diameter), where the coil-to-globule transition shifted to lower temperatures. The liquidlike to solidlike transition was present at almost the same temperature for different conditions of confinement, chain size, and number of arms. The behavior of the systems for separations between the walls greater than five bead diameters was similar to the behavior in the unconfined case. Hence, no considerable effect of confinement was found above this separation. ©2004 American Institute of Physics.
History: Received 18 June 2004; accepted 22 July 2004
Permalink: http://link.aip.org/link/?JCPSA6/121/8652/1
BUY THIS ARTICLE   (US$24)
Download HTML Download Sectioned HTML Download PDF (144 kB) View Cart

KEYWORDS and PACS

Keywords
PACS
  • 64.70.Dv
    Solid–liquid transitions
  • 64.70.Fx
    Liquid–vapor transitions
  • 61.41.+e
    Structure of polymers, elastomers, and plastics
  • 65.40.Ba
    Heat capacity of crystalline solids
  • YEAR: 2004

RELATED DATABASES


To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.
To view database links for this article,
you need to log in.

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:
0021-9606 (print)   1089-7690 (online)
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef AIP

REFERENCES (12)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in. For access to fully linked references, you need to Log in.
  1. J. J. Freire, Adv. Polym. Sci. 143, 35 (1999).
  2. N. Peppas, A. Argade, and S. Bhargava, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 87, 322 (2003).
  3. S. Brown and G. Szamel, Macromol. Theory Simul. 9, 14 (2000).
  4. A. M. Rubio and J. J. Freire, Comput. Theor. Polym. Sci. 10, 89 (2000).
  5. G. Zifferer, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 4668 (1999).
  6. P. Romiszowski and A. Sikorski, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 2912 (1998).
  7. T. Pakula, D. Vlassopoulos, G. Fytas, and J. Roovers, Macromolecules 31, 8931 (1998).
  8. C. N. Likos, H. Lowen, A. Poppe, L. Willner, J. Roovers, B. Cubitt, and D. Richter, Phys. Rev. E 58, 6299 (1998).
  9. P. Romiszowski and A. Sikorski, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1731 (2002).
  10. J. R. Maury-Evertsz, L. A. Estévez, and G. E. López, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 9925 (2003).
  11. Y. Sheng, A. Panagiotopoulos, S. Kumar, and I. Szleifer, Macromolecules 27, 400 (1997).
  12. M. Falcioni and M. W. Deem, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 1754 (1999).

CITING ARTICLES

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.